Duvivier C, Bohadana A B, Peslin R
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1977 Sep-Oct;13(5):669-80.
Two electronic spirometers which use standard pneumotachographs were evaluated for their static and dynamic response, and clinically compared in 20 subjects to a reference flow channel. In the Pneumoscreen the data are digitalized and stored, permitting to play back the flow-volume curves at low or high speed. The instrument provides a direct read-out of forced vital capacity and of five indexes of forced expiration. It was found perfectly adequate with respect to linearity and frequency response. However, due to some systematic error in digital processing, maximum flow at low lung volumes appeared substantially over-estimated. Besides forced vital capacity and a number of indexes of forced expiration, the Medistor type M 010 may be used to measure ventilation, tidal volume, frequency and maximum breathing capacity. The data are processed by an analog computer. The transducer was found poorly linear with inadequate frequency response. However, no systematic bias in the measurements was found, except for peak flow and maximum breathing capacity.
对两台使用标准呼吸流速计的电子肺活量计进行了静态和动态响应评估,并在20名受试者中与参考流量通道进行了临床比较。在Pneumoscreen中,数据被数字化并存储,允许以低速或高速回放流量-容积曲线。该仪器可直接读出用力肺活量和五个用力呼气指标。发现其在线性度和频率响应方面完全足够。然而,由于数字处理中的一些系统误差,低肺容量时的最大流量似乎被大幅高估。除了用力肺活量和一些用力呼气指标外,Medistor M 010型还可用于测量通气量、潮气量、频率和最大呼吸容量。数据由模拟计算机处理。发现该换能器线性较差,频率响应不足。然而,除了峰值流量和最大呼吸容量外,未发现测量中有系统偏差。