Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242828. eCollection 2020.
Relational aspects, such as involvement of donor's relatives or friends in the decision-making on participation in a research biobank, providing relatives' health data to researchers, or sharing research findings with relatives should be considered when reflecting on ethical aspects of research biobanks. The aim of this paper is to explore what the role of donor's relatives and friends is in the process of becoming and being a biobank donor and which ethical issues arise in this context. We performed qualitative analysis of 40 qualitative semi-structured interviews with biobank donors and researchers. The results show that relatedness to relatives or other types of close relationships played a significant role in the donors' motivation to be involved in a biobank, risk-benefit assessment, and decisions on sharing information on research and its results. Interviewees mentioned ethical issues in the context of sharing relatives' health-related data for research purposes and returning research findings that may affect their relatives. We conclude that the question of what information on family members may be shared with a biobank by research participants without informed consent of those relatives, and when family members become research subjects, lacks a clear answer and detailed guidelines, especially in the context of the introduction of the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation. Researchers in Latvia and EU face ethical questions and dilemmas about returning research results and incidental findings to donors' relatives, and donors need more information on sharing research results with relatives in the informed consent process.
在反思研究生物库的伦理问题时,应考虑到关系方面的问题,例如捐赠者的亲属或朋友参与参与研究生物库的决策、向研究人员提供亲属的健康数据,或与亲属分享研究结果。本文的目的是探讨在成为和成为生物库捐赠者的过程中,捐赠者的亲属和朋友扮演什么角色,以及在这方面出现哪些伦理问题。我们对 40 名生物库捐赠者和研究人员的定性半结构化访谈进行了定性分析。结果表明,与亲属或其他类型的亲密关系的关系在捐赠者参与生物库的动机、风险-效益评估以及关于信息共享及其结果的决策中起着重要作用。受访者提到了在为研究目的共享亲属的健康相关数据以及返回可能影响其亲属的研究结果的背景下的伦理问题。我们的结论是,在没有这些亲属的知情同意的情况下,研究参与者可以向生物库共享哪些关于家庭成员的信息,以及当家庭成员成为研究对象时,缺乏明确的答案和详细的指导方针,特别是在引入欧盟(EU)一般数据保护条例的背景下。拉脱维亚和欧盟的研究人员面临着向捐赠者亲属返还研究结果和偶然发现的伦理问题,而捐赠者在知情同意过程中需要更多关于与亲属分享研究结果的信息。