• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Becoming and being a biobank donor: The role of relationships and ethics.成为和成为生物银行捐赠者:关系和伦理的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242828. eCollection 2020.
2
Perception of Polish patients with cancer of the ethical and legal issues related to biobank research.波兰癌症患者对与生物库研究相关的伦理和法律问题的看法。
Oncologist. 2024 Jul 5;29(7):e887-e898. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae078.
3
'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?生物样本库伦理的“镜像”:我们应从同意书分析中学到什么[已修正]?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
4
It is not a big deal: a qualitative study of clinical biobank donation experience and motives.这没什么大不了的:一项关于临床生物库捐赠体验和动机的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 29;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00743-6.
5
Biobanks in the low- and middle-income countries of the Arab Middle East region: challenges, ethical issues, and governance arrangements-a qualitative study involving biobank managers.阿拉伯中东地区中低收入国家的生物库:挑战、伦理问题和治理安排——一项涉及生物库管理者的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 14;23(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00822-8.
6
[Establishing and operating a human biobank. Ethical aspects].[建立和运营人类生物样本库。伦理方面]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Mar;59(3):311-6. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2292-5.
7
Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.生物银行与捐赠者的道德关切:民主审议。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Nov;29(13):1942-1953. doi: 10.1177/1049732318791826. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
Decision making on organ donation: the dilemmas of relatives of potential brain dead donors.器官捐赠的决策:潜在脑死亡捐赠者亲属的困境
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 17;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0057-1.
9
Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.公众对参与生物样本库用于研究的态度:一项意大利调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Nov 26;15:81. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-81.
10
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations.关于向三个种族和少数民族群体的家庭披露基因研究结果的观点。
J Community Genet. 2020 Oct;11(4):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00472-6. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?个体基因组研究结果的返还:法律法规是否跟上步伐?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr;27(4):535-546. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0311-3. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.研究人员应向癌症生物样本库参与者的家庭成员提供研究结果吗?一项关于先证者及其家属偏好的混合方法研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1546241. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
[Not Available].[不可用]。
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci. 2017 Oct 27;28(3):113-117. doi: 10.3917/jib.283.0113.
5
Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.参与者和拒绝参加者对参与全基因组测序临床试验风险的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624078. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
6
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.向研究参与者的亲属反馈基因组结果:分析与建议。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
7
Biosamples as gifts? How participants in biobanking projects talk about donation.生物样本作为礼物?生物样本库项目的参与者如何谈论捐赠。
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):805-16. doi: 10.1111/hex.12376. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
8
Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.家庭决策者对生物样本库研究中基因检测结果反馈的看法。
Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):82-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.38. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
9
The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research.在个人基因组研究中,新兴的以家庭为中心的同意获取倡议的需求。
Genome Med. 2014 Dec 17;6(12):118. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0118-y. eCollection 2014.
10
Does family always matter? Public genomes and their effect on relatives.家庭总是至关重要吗?公开的基因组及其对亲属的影响。
Genome Med. 2013 Dec 17;5(12):107. doi: 10.1186/gm511. eCollection 2013.

成为和成为生物银行捐赠者:关系和伦理的作用。

Becoming and being a biobank donor: The role of relationships and ethics.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242828. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242828
PMID:33227030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7682884/
Abstract

Relational aspects, such as involvement of donor's relatives or friends in the decision-making on participation in a research biobank, providing relatives' health data to researchers, or sharing research findings with relatives should be considered when reflecting on ethical aspects of research biobanks. The aim of this paper is to explore what the role of donor's relatives and friends is in the process of becoming and being a biobank donor and which ethical issues arise in this context. We performed qualitative analysis of 40 qualitative semi-structured interviews with biobank donors and researchers. The results show that relatedness to relatives or other types of close relationships played a significant role in the donors' motivation to be involved in a biobank, risk-benefit assessment, and decisions on sharing information on research and its results. Interviewees mentioned ethical issues in the context of sharing relatives' health-related data for research purposes and returning research findings that may affect their relatives. We conclude that the question of what information on family members may be shared with a biobank by research participants without informed consent of those relatives, and when family members become research subjects, lacks a clear answer and detailed guidelines, especially in the context of the introduction of the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation. Researchers in Latvia and EU face ethical questions and dilemmas about returning research results and incidental findings to donors' relatives, and donors need more information on sharing research results with relatives in the informed consent process.

摘要

在反思研究生物库的伦理问题时,应考虑到关系方面的问题,例如捐赠者的亲属或朋友参与参与研究生物库的决策、向研究人员提供亲属的健康数据,或与亲属分享研究结果。本文的目的是探讨在成为和成为生物库捐赠者的过程中,捐赠者的亲属和朋友扮演什么角色,以及在这方面出现哪些伦理问题。我们对 40 名生物库捐赠者和研究人员的定性半结构化访谈进行了定性分析。结果表明,与亲属或其他类型的亲密关系的关系在捐赠者参与生物库的动机、风险-效益评估以及关于信息共享及其结果的决策中起着重要作用。受访者提到了在为研究目的共享亲属的健康相关数据以及返回可能影响其亲属的研究结果的背景下的伦理问题。我们的结论是,在没有这些亲属的知情同意的情况下,研究参与者可以向生物库共享哪些关于家庭成员的信息,以及当家庭成员成为研究对象时,缺乏明确的答案和详细的指导方针,特别是在引入欧盟(EU)一般数据保护条例的背景下。拉脱维亚和欧盟的研究人员面临着向捐赠者亲属返还研究结果和偶然发现的伦理问题,而捐赠者在知情同意过程中需要更多关于与亲属分享研究结果的信息。