Suppr超能文献

抗毒素抗体与复发性艰难梭菌感染无关。

Anti-toxin antibody is not associated with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

机构信息

School of Public Health, USA.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, USA.

出版信息

Anaerobe. 2021 Feb;67:102299. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102299. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurs in ∼20% of patients. Prior studies indicated that antibody responses directed against the C. difficile toxins A and B were potentially associated with lower risk of recurrent CDI. Here we tested the hypothesis that circulating anti-toxin IgG antibody levels associate with reduced risk of recurrent CDI. A cohort study with prospective enrollment and retrospective data abstraction examined antibody levels in 275 adult patients at the University of Michigan with CDI. We developed an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay to detect IgG antibodies against toxin A and toxin B in sera obtained at the time of diagnosis. Logistic regression examined the relationship between antibody levels and recurrence, and sensitivity tests evaluated for follow-up and survivor biases, history of CDI, and PCR ribotype. Follow-up data were available for 174 subjects, of whom 36 (20.7%) had recurrence. Comparing antibody levels vs. recurrence and CDI history, anti-toxin A levels were similar, while anti-toxin B levels had a greater range of values. In unadjusted analysis, detection of anti-toxin A antibodies, but not anti-toxin B antibodies, associated with an increased risk of recurrence (OR 2.71 [1.06, 8.37], P = .053). Adjusting for confounders weakened this association. The results were the same in sensitivity analyses. We observed a borderline increased risk of recurrence in patients positive for anti-toxin A antibodies, and sensitivity analyses showed this was not simply a reflection of prior exposure status. Future studies are needed to assess how neutralizing antibody or levels after treatment associate with recurrence.

摘要

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)在约 20%的患者中复发。先前的研究表明,针对艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的抗体反应可能与较低的 CDI 复发风险相关。在这里,我们检验了循环抗毒素 IgG 抗体水平与降低 CDI 复发风险相关的假设。一项前瞻性入组和回顾性数据提取的队列研究,检查了密歇根大学 275 名成人 CDI 患者的抗体水平。我们开发了一种酶联免疫吸附试验来检测诊断时血清中针对毒素 A 和毒素 B 的 IgG 抗体。逻辑回归检验了抗体水平与复发之间的关系,敏感性试验评估了随访和幸存者偏倚、CDI 病史和 PCR 核糖体分型的影响。174 名患者中有随访数据,其中 36 名(20.7%)复发。比较抗体水平与复发和 CDI 病史,抗毒素 A 水平相似,而抗毒素 B 水平的变化范围更大。在未调整的分析中,检测到抗毒素 A 抗体,但不是抗毒素 B 抗体,与复发风险增加相关(OR 2.71 [1.06, 8.37],P = 0.053)。调整混杂因素后,这种关联减弱。敏感性分析结果相同。我们观察到抗毒素 A 抗体阳性患者的复发风险略有增加,敏感性分析表明这不仅仅是先前暴露状态的反映。需要进一步研究评估治疗后中和抗体或水平与复发的关系。

相似文献

1
Anti-toxin antibody is not associated with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.
Anaerobe. 2021 Feb;67:102299. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102299. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
2
The impact of existing total anti-toxin B IgG immunity in outcomes of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.
Anaerobe. 2024 Jun;87:102842. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102842. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Development of a new serological assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections with prognostic value.
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Dec;167:105777. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105777. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
IgG antibody response to toxins A and B in patients with Clostridium difficile infection.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1552-4. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00210-12. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
8
Serum anti-toxin B antibody correlates with protection from recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).
Vaccine. 2010 Jan 22;28(4):965-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.144. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
9
Host Immune Response to Clostridium difficile Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Apr;22(4):853-61. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000696.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Biomarkers, Including PCR Cycle Threshold, for Predicting Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.
Infect Immun. 2023 Apr 18;91(4):e0009223. doi: 10.1128/iai.00092-23. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Antigen-Specific vs. Neutralizing Antibodies Against Conditioned Media of Patients With Infection: A Prospective Exploratory Study.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 24;13:859037. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.859037. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Clostridium difficile infection: review.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;38(7):1211-1221. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03539-6. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
2
Bezlotoxumab.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 1;68(4):699-704. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy577.
3
An Observational Cohort Study of Ribotype 027 and Recurrent Infection.
mSphere. 2018 May 23;3(3). doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00033-18. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
4
Recent Progress for the Effective Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Infection.
Infect Dis (Auckl). 2018 Mar 7;11:1178633718758023. doi: 10.1177/1178633718758023. eCollection 2018.
5
Risk of Subsequent Sepsis Within 90 Days After a Hospital Stay by Type of Antibiotic Exposure.
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):1004-1012. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix947.
6
Prediction of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection Using Comprehensive Electronic Medical Records in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1196-1203. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.176. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Community-acquired infection.
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Feb;63(2):131-132.
8
Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):305-317. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602615.
9
A Comprehensive Study of Costs Associated With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):196-202. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.246. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验