South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01914-z.
The Australian Transition Care Program (TCP) is a national intermediate care service aiming to optimise functional independence and delay entry to permanent care for older people leaving hospital. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of TCP and identify demographic and clinical factors associated with TCP 'success', to assist with clinical judgements about suitable candidates for the program.
We conducted a descriptive cohort study of all older Australians accessing TCP for the first time between 2007 and 2015. Logistic regression models assessed demographic and clinical factors associated with change in performance on a modified Barthel Index from TCP entry to discharge and on discharge to community. Fine-Gray regression models estimated factors associated with transition to permanent care within 6 months of TCP discharge, with death as a competing event.
Functional independence improved from entry to discharge for 46,712 (38.4%) of 124,301 TCP users. Improvement was more common with younger age, less frailty, shorter hospital stay prior to TCP, and among women, those without a carer, living outside a major city, and without dementia. People who received TCP in a residential setting were far less likely to record improved functional impairment and more likely to be discharged to permanent care than those in a community setting. Discharge to community was more common with younger age and among women and those without dementia. Nearly 12% of community TCP and 63% of residential TCP users had transitioned to permanent care 6 months after discharge. Entry to permanent care was more common with older age, higher levels of frailty, and among those with dementia.
More than half of TCP users are discharged to home and remain at home after 6 months. However, residential-based TCP may have limited efficacy. Age, frailty, carer status, and dementia are key factors to consider when assessing program suitability. Future studies comparing users to a suitably matched control group will be very helpful for confirming whether the TCP program is meeting its aims.
澳大利亚过渡护理计划(TCP)是一项全国性的中级护理服务,旨在优化老年人离开医院后的功能独立性并延迟进入永久性护理。本研究的目的是描述 TCP 的结果,并确定与 TCP“成功”相关的人口统计学和临床因素,以协助对适合该计划的候选人进行临床判断。
我们对 2007 年至 2015 年间首次接受 TCP 的所有澳大利亚老年人进行了描述性队列研究。逻辑回归模型评估了与从 TCP 入院到出院和出院到社区时改良巴氏量表评分变化相关的人口统计学和临床因素。精细灰色回归模型估计了 TCP 出院后 6 个月内过渡到永久性护理的相关因素,将死亡作为竞争事件。
124301 名 TCP 用户中有 46712 名(38.4%)的功能独立性从入院到出院有所改善。年龄较小、身体虚弱程度较低、TCP 前住院时间较短的患者,以及女性、无照顾者、居住在大城市以外、无痴呆症的患者,改善更为常见。在住宅环境中接受 TCP 的患者记录到的功能障碍改善的可能性较小,而更有可能被转移到永久性护理中,而在社区环境中接受 TCP 的患者则较少。较年轻的年龄和女性以及无痴呆症的患者更有可能出院到社区。出院后 6 个月,社区 TCP 的近 12%和住宅 TCP 用户的 63%已过渡到永久性护理。进入永久性护理的可能性与年龄较大、身体虚弱程度较高以及痴呆症有关。
超过一半的 TCP 用户出院到家中,并在 6 个月后仍留在家中。然而,住宅式 TCP 的效果可能有限。在评估计划适用性时,年龄、身体虚弱程度、照顾者状况和痴呆症是需要考虑的关键因素。比较使用者和适当匹配的对照组的未来研究将非常有助于确认 TCP 计划是否达到了其目标。