Suppr超能文献

比较危重症患者连续与间断肠内营养(COINN):一项随机对照有效性试验的研究方案。

Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill patients (COINN): study protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, VVI CZECRIN, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Nov 23;21(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04866-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition is part of the treatment of critically ill patients. Administration of enteral nutrition may be associated with signs of intolerance, such as high gastric residual volumes, diarrhea, and vomiting. Clinical trials regarding the effects of the mode of administration of enteral nutrition on the occurrence of these complications have yielded conflicting results. This trial aims to investigate whether the mode of administration of enteral nutrition affects the time to reach nutritional targets, intolerance, and complications.

METHODS

COINN is a randomized, monocentric study for critically ill adult patients receiving enteral nutrition. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups receiving (1) continuous or (2) intermittent administration of enteral nutrition. Enhancement of enteral nutrition will depend on signs of tolerance, mainly the gastric residual volume. The primary outcome will be the time to reach the energetic target. Secondary outcomes will be the time to reach the protein target, tolerance, complications, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and 28-day mortality.

DISCUSSION

This trial aims to evaluate whether the mode of application of enteral nutrition affects the time to reach nutritional targets, signs of intolerance, and complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03573453. Registered on 29 June 2018.

摘要

背景

肠内营养是危重症患者治疗的一部分。肠内营养的给予可能与不耐受的迹象相关,如胃残留量高、腹泻和呕吐。关于肠内营养给予方式对这些并发症发生影响的临床试验结果存在矛盾。本试验旨在研究肠内营养给予方式是否影响达到营养目标的时间、不耐受和并发症。

方法

COINN 是一项针对接受肠内营养的成年危重症患者的随机、单中心研究。患者将被随机分配到两组,分别接受(1)连续或(2)间歇性肠内营养给予。肠内营养的增强将取决于耐受的迹象,主要是胃残留量。主要结局将是达到能量目标的时间。次要结局将是达到蛋白质目标的时间、耐受情况、并发症、住院和 ICU 时间以及 28 天死亡率。

讨论

本试验旨在评估肠内营养的应用方式是否影响达到营养目标的时间、不耐受和并发症。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03573453. 注册于 2018 年 6 月 29 日。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit.ESPEN 重症监护病房临床营养指南。
Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
2
Continuous or intermittent feeding: pros and cons.持续喂养与间断喂养:利弊分析。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Aug;24(4):256-261. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000513.
4
Intermittent versus continuous feeding in critically ill adults.间断与持续喂养在危重症成人中的比较。
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018 Mar;21(2):116-120. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000447.
6
Feeding the Critically Ill: More Questions Than Answers!为重症患者提供营养支持:问题多于答案!
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 1;195(5):555-556. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1850ED.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验