Suppr超能文献

一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案,旨在探讨危重症患者连续与间断肠内喂养的影响。

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 19;13(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02652-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Enteral nutrition (EN) is the recommended nutritional support in most critically ill populations. When given by feeding tube, EN may be administered either continuously or intermittently. It is unclear which approach is superior in reducing gastrointestinal complications-such as diarrhea-and meeting nutritional targets. The main objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to (1) determine whether continuous or intermittent enteral nutrition is associated with higher incidence of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes, including diarrhea, and (2) determine which feeding modality is associated with reaching nutritional goals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry (ICTRP) search portal for studies comparing continuous EN and intermittent EN in critically ill patients with no date or language restrictions. Studies will be screened, selected, and extracted independently and in duplicate. We will assess the risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool. The primary outcome will include the incidence of diarrhea; secondary outcomes include other adverse GI outcomes (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation), as well as reaching nutritional goals, and length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. We will pool data using a random-effects model and assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this study as no original data will be collected. We will disseminate results through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022330118.

摘要

简介

肠内营养(EN)是大多数危重症患者推荐的营养支持方式。通过喂养管给予 EN 时,可以连续或间歇给予。目前尚不清楚哪种方法在减少胃肠道并发症(如腹泻)和达到营养目标方面更具优势。本系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是:(1)确定连续或间歇肠内营养与不良胃肠道结局(包括腹泻)的发生率更高是否相关;(2)确定哪种喂养方式与达到营养目标相关。方法和分析:本系统评价方案按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)声明进行报告。我们将在 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)搜索门户中,对比较连续 EN 和间歇 EN 在无时间或语言限制的危重症患者中的研究进行检索。研究将独立并重复进行筛选、选择和提取。我们将使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚(RoB)2 工具评估风险偏倚评估。主要结局将包括腹泻的发生率;次要结局包括其他不良胃肠道结局(恶心、呕吐、腹痛和便秘),以及达到营养目标、ICU 和住院时间以及死亡率。我们将使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法学评估每个结局的证据确定性。

伦理和传播

本研究不需要伦理批准,因为不会收集原始数据。我们将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告来传播研究结果。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42022330118。

相似文献

5
Nutritional support for critically ill children.危重症儿童的营养支持
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 27;2016(5):CD005144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005144.pub3.
6
Feeding the critically ill obese patient: a systematic review protocol.为危重症肥胖患者提供营养支持:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):95-109. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2458.

本文引用的文献

1
Diarrhea during critical illness: a multicenter cohort study.危重症期间的腹泻:一项多中心队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 May;48(5):570-579. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06663-8. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Enteral Nutrition in Pediatric Patients.儿科患者的肠内营养
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):12-19. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2018.21.1.12. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验