Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 19;13(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02652-8.
Enteral nutrition (EN) is the recommended nutritional support in most critically ill populations. When given by feeding tube, EN may be administered either continuously or intermittently. It is unclear which approach is superior in reducing gastrointestinal complications-such as diarrhea-and meeting nutritional targets. The main objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to (1) determine whether continuous or intermittent enteral nutrition is associated with higher incidence of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes, including diarrhea, and (2) determine which feeding modality is associated with reaching nutritional goals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry (ICTRP) search portal for studies comparing continuous EN and intermittent EN in critically ill patients with no date or language restrictions. Studies will be screened, selected, and extracted independently and in duplicate. We will assess the risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool. The primary outcome will include the incidence of diarrhea; secondary outcomes include other adverse GI outcomes (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation), as well as reaching nutritional goals, and length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. We will pool data using a random-effects model and assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology.
Ethics approval is not required for this study as no original data will be collected. We will disseminate results through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
PROSPERO CRD42022330118.
肠内营养(EN)是大多数危重症患者推荐的营养支持方式。通过喂养管给予 EN 时,可以连续或间歇给予。目前尚不清楚哪种方法在减少胃肠道并发症(如腹泻)和达到营养目标方面更具优势。本系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是:(1)确定连续或间歇肠内营养与不良胃肠道结局(包括腹泻)的发生率更高是否相关;(2)确定哪种喂养方式与达到营养目标相关。方法和分析:本系统评价方案按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)声明进行报告。我们将在 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)搜索门户中,对比较连续 EN 和间歇 EN 在无时间或语言限制的危重症患者中的研究进行检索。研究将独立并重复进行筛选、选择和提取。我们将使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚(RoB)2 工具评估风险偏倚评估。主要结局将包括腹泻的发生率;次要结局包括其他不良胃肠道结局(恶心、呕吐、腹痛和便秘),以及达到营养目标、ICU 和住院时间以及死亡率。我们将使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法学评估每个结局的证据确定性。
本研究不需要伦理批准,因为不会收集原始数据。我们将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告来传播研究结果。
PROSPERO CRD42022330118。