Dept. of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, 2205 Songhu Road, Yangpu, Shanghai, 200438, PR China; Center for Land and Resource Economics Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, PR China.
School of Real Estate and Land Management, Royal Agricultural University, Gloucestershire, GL7 6JS, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111675. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111675. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
Farmer-led agricultural innovation is increasingly viewed as a potential approach to sustainable agriculture especially promoting rural revitalization as well as mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution. However, little research has yet been paid to evaluating the environmental contribution caused by these emerging agricultural innovations. Using data generated in the Qingpu District of Shanghai, this paper focuses on the new agri-business entities and evaluates the impact of agricultural innovation on changes in their use of chemical fertilizers. The findings indicate that different forms of agricultural innovation have radically different outcomes. Innovation of new production technologies and sales tend to have negative impacts on the environment, while both vertical integration with manufacturing-processing-sales activities, and horizontal integration with service activities, are found to make a positive environmental contribution. The paper argues that the different sources of value added generated by innovation provide different incentives for farmers. Those with a narrow concentration on efficiency and market scale tend to intensify their output-maximized production, while those shifting to processing and service activities rely more on the quality and service centered production, which tends to create less damage to the environment.
农民主导的农业创新越来越被视为可持续农业的一种潜在途径,特别是促进农村振兴和减轻农业面源污染。然而,对于评估这些新兴农业创新所带来的环境贡献,研究还很少。本文利用上海青浦区产生的数据,聚焦于新的农业企业实体,并评估农业创新对其化肥使用变化的影响。研究结果表明,不同形式的农业创新有截然不同的结果。新生产技术和销售的创新往往对环境产生负面影响,而与制造加工销售活动的垂直整合,以及与服务活动的水平整合,都被发现对环境有积极贡献。本文认为,创新所产生的不同附加值来源为农民提供了不同的激励。那些狭隘地专注于效率和市场规模的人往往会加强以产量最大化为目标的生产,而那些转向加工和服务活动的人则更多地依赖于以质量和服务为中心的生产,这往往对环境造成的破坏较小。