• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MADDIE 的开发与评估:从电子健康记录中获取分娩日期信息的方法。

Development and evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic health records.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104339. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104339
PMID:33232918
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop an algorithm that infers patient delivery dates (PDDs) and delivery-specific details from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) with high accuracy; enabling pregnancy-level outcome studies in women's health.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained EHR data from 1,060,100 female patients treated at Penn Medicine hospitals or outpatient clinics between 2010-2017. We developed an algorithm called MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records that infers a PDD for distinct deliveries based on EHR encounter dates assigned a delivery code, the frequency of code usage, and the time differential between code assignments. We validated MADDIE's PDDs against a birth log independently maintained by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

RESULTS

MADDIE identified 50,560 patients having 63,334 distinct deliveries. MADDIE was 98.6 % accurate (F-score 92.1 %) when compared to the birth log. The PDD was on average 0.68 days earlier than the true delivery date for patients with only one delivery (± 1.43 days) and 0.52 days earlier for patients with more than one delivery episode (± 1.11 days).

DISCUSSION

MADDIE is the first algorithm to successfully infer PDD information using only structured delivery codes and identify multiple deliveries per patient. MADDIE is also the first to validate the accuracy of the PDD using an external gold standard of known delivery dates as opposed to manual chart review of a sample.

CONCLUSION

MADDIE augments the EHR with delivery-specific details extracted with high accuracy and relies only on structured EHR elements while harnessing temporal information and the frequency of code usage to identify accurate PDDs.

摘要

目的

开发一种算法,从电子健康记录(EHR)中高度准确地推断患者分娩日期(PDD)和分娩具体细节;使妇女健康的妊娠结局研究成为可能。

材料与方法

我们从 2010 年至 2017 年在宾夕法尼亚大学医学院医院或门诊接受治疗的 1,060,100 名女性患者中获得了 EHR 数据。我们开发了一种名为 MADDIE 的算法:从电子健康记录中获取分娩日期信息的方法,该算法根据分配了分娩代码的 EHR 就诊日期、代码使用频率以及代码分配之间的时间差,为每个分娩推断出一个 PDD。我们将 MADDIE 的 PDD 与妇产科独立维护的出生记录进行了验证。

结果

MADDIE 确定了 50,560 名患者的 63,334 个不同分娩。与出生记录相比,MADDIE 的准确率为 98.6%(F 分数为 92.1%)。对于仅有一次分娩的患者,PDD 平均比实际分娩日期早 0.68 天(±1.43 天),对于有多次分娩的患者,PDD 平均早 0.52 天(±1.11 天)。

讨论

MADDIE 是第一个仅使用结构化分娩代码成功推断 PDD 信息并识别每位患者多次分娩的算法。MADDIE 也是第一个使用已知分娩日期的外部黄金标准而非手动审查样本来验证 PDD 准确性的算法。

结论

MADDIE 使用高度准确的方法从 EHR 中提取分娩细节,并仅依赖结构化的 EHR 元素,同时利用时间信息和代码使用频率来识别准确的 PDD。

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic health records.MADDIE 的开发与评估:从电子健康记录中获取分娩日期信息的方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104339. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
Determining diagnosis date of diabetes using structured electronic health record (EHR) data: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study.利用结构化电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据确定糖尿病的诊断日期:青少年糖尿病研究中的 SEARCH 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01394-8.
3
Linking mothers and infants within electronic health records: a comparison of deterministic and probabilistic algorithms.在电子健康记录中关联母婴:确定性算法与概率性算法的比较
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):45-51. doi: 10.1002/pds.3728. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
4
Evaluation of an Algorithm for Identifying Ocular Conditions in Electronic Health Record Data.评估一种在电子健康记录数据中识别眼部疾病的算法。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 May 1;137(5):491-497. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.7051.
5
Optimizing research in symptomatic uterine fibroids with development of a computable phenotype for use with electronic health records.优化有症状的子宫纤维瘤的研究,开发可计算的表型,用于电子健康记录。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):610.e1-610.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
Rule-based and machine learning algorithms identify patients with systemic sclerosis accurately in the electronic health record.基于规则和机器学习算法可在电子健康记录中准确识别系统性硬化症患者。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 30;21(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7.
7
Validating an ontology-based algorithm to identify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in electronic health records.验证一种基于本体的算法,以在电子健康记录中识别2型糖尿病患者。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Oct;83(10):768-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
8
Automated feature selection of predictors in electronic medical records data.电子病历数据中预测指标的自动特征选择
Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):268-277. doi: 10.1111/biom.12987. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
9
Using electronic health records data to identify patients with chronic pain in a primary care setting.利用电子健康记录数据在基层医疗环境中识别慢性疼痛患者。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e275-80. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001856. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
10
Development of algorithms to determine the onset of pregnancy and delivery date using health care administrative data in a university hospital in Japan.利用日本某大学医院的医疗保健管理数据开发确定妊娠开始和分娩日期的算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):751-762. doi: 10.1002/pds.4444. Epub 2018 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy episodes in All of Us: harnessing multi-source data for pregnancy-related research.“我们所有人”研究中的妊娠事件:利用多源数据进行妊娠相关研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2789-2799. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae195.
2
Computational Phenotyping of OMOP CDM Normalized EHR for Prenatal and Postpartum Episodes: An Informatics Framework and Clinical Implementation on All of Us.基于 OMOP CDM 标准化 EHR 的孕期和产后病例计算表型分析:All of Us 中的信息学框架和临床应用
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:1096-1104. eCollection 2023.
3
Who is pregnant? Defining real-world data-based pregnancy episodes in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).
谁怀孕了?在国家新冠队列协作组(N3C)中定义基于真实世界数据的妊娠事件。
JAMIA Open. 2023 Aug 16;6(3):ooad067. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad067. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
A medication-wide association study (MWAS) on repurposed drugs for COVID-19 with Pre-pandemic prescription medication exposure and pregnancy outcomes.一项针对 COVID-19 再利用药物的药物广泛关联研究(MWAS),研究了与大流行前处方药物暴露和妊娠结局相关的药物。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 24;12(1):20314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24218-1.
5
Temporal Events Detector for Pregnancy Care (TED-PC): A rule-based algorithm to infer gestational age and delivery date from electronic health records of pregnant women with and without COVID-19.妊娠期时间事件探测器(TED-PC):一种基于规则的算法,用于从患有和不患有 COVID-19 的孕妇的电子健康记录中推断孕龄和分娩日期。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 31;17(10):e0276923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276923. eCollection 2022.
6
Who is pregnant? defining real-world data-based pregnancy episodes in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).谁怀孕了?在国家新冠队列协作组(N3C)中定义基于真实世界数据的妊娠事件。
medRxiv. 2022 Aug 6:2022.08.04.22278439. doi: 10.1101/2022.08.04.22278439.
7
Medication-Wide Association Study Using Electronic Health Record Data of Prescription Medication Exposure and Multifetal Pregnancies: Retrospective Study.使用电子健康记录数据进行的药物广泛关联研究:关于处方药暴露与多胎妊娠的回顾性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jun 7;10(6):e32229. doi: 10.2196/32229.
8
Neighborhood deprivation increases the risk of Post-induction cesarean delivery.社区剥夺增加了引产剖宫产的风险。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 12;29(2):329-334. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab258.
9
Evaluation of Stillbirth Among Pregnant People With Sickle Cell Trait.评估镰状细胞特征的孕妇中的死产。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34274.