Freeman Matthew C, Ellis Anna S, Ogutu Emily Awino, Caruso Bethany A, Linabarger Molly, Micek Katie, Muga Richard, Girard Amy Webb, Wodnik Breanna K, Jacob Arriola Kimberly
Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002806.
Growth shortfalls and diarrhoeal diseases remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low-income settings. Due to the multifaceted causes of undernutrition and the identified limitations of siloed nutrition programmes, improving the delivery of integrated water, sanitation, hygiene (WASH) and nutrition programming could improve child health.
We conducted a cluster randomised trial in western Kenya to assess the impact on household behaviours of a novel, theory-informed and integrated WASH and nutrition intervention delivered through care groups as compared with the standard care group approach. We developed an intervention targeting practices relating to food hygiene, mealtime and feeding, and compound cleanliness, each using various behavioural change techniques to influence the uptake of targeted behaviours. Prespecified behavioural outcomes were verified through direct observation, 24 hours recall, and self-reported picture-based methods.
Compared with control households, a greater proportion of intervention households had a hygienic food preparation area (Risk double difference (RDD) 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.96), had stored food hygienically (RDD 0.76, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.00), had a functional handwashing station (RDD 0.64, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.74), provided a safe space for their child to play (RDD 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96), and who fed their children thickened porridge (RDD 0.56, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.63) at endline. The proportion of children 6-24 months in intervention households consuming a sufficient diversity of foods (RDD 0.81, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.04) was higher than in control households; however, there was a non-significant increase in the percentage of pregnant and lactating women receiving an adequate diversity of foods in their diets (RDD 0.86, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.05) among intervention compared with control households at endline.
Our integrated WASH and nutrition intervention resulted in important changes in behaviours. This theory-informed intervention could be added to existing care group programmes to considerable advantage.
生长发育迟缓与腹泻病仍是低收入地区发病和死亡的主要原因。由于营养不良的成因是多方面的,且孤立的营养项目存在已确认的局限性,因此改善综合的水、环境卫生、个人卫生(WASH)与营养项目的实施情况可能会改善儿童健康状况。
我们在肯尼亚西部进行了一项整群随机试验,以评估与标准护理组方法相比,通过护理组实施的一种新颖的、基于理论的综合WASH与营养干预措施对家庭行为的影响。我们制定了一项干预措施,针对与食品卫生、用餐时间和喂养以及居住环境清洁度相关的行为,每项行为都采用各种行为改变技术来影响目标行为的采用。预先设定的行为结果通过直接观察、24小时回顾和基于图片的自我报告方法进行验证。
与对照家庭相比,干预家庭中更大比例的家庭有卫生的食品制备区域(风险双差(RDD)0.81,95%置信区间0.68至0.96)、食品储存卫生(RDD 0.76,95%置信区间0.58至1.00)、有可用的洗手设施(RDD 0.64,95%置信区间0.56至0.74)、为孩子提供了安全的玩耍空间(RDD 0.73,95%置信区间0.56至0.96),并且在随访结束时给孩子喂了稠粥(RDD 0.56,95%置信区间0.51至0.63)。干预家庭中6至24个月大的儿童摄入足够多样食物的比例(RDD 0.81,95%置信区间0.64至1.04)高于对照家庭;然而,与对照家庭相比,干预家庭中孕期和哺乳期妇女饮食中摄入足够多样食物的百分比增加不显著(RDD 0.86,95%置信区间0.70至1.05)。
我们的综合WASH与营养干预措施导致了行为上的重要改变。这种基于理论的干预措施可以添加到现有的护理组项目中,带来可观的益处。