Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照、单中心、开放性药代动力学研究,旨在考察电子烟输送尼古丁的各种方法。

A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes.

机构信息

British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited, Research and Development, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.

DoctorProctorScience Ltd, 157 Cavendish Meads, Sunninghill, Ascot, SL5 9TG, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 24;10(1):19980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76610-4.

Abstract

Smokers who switch completely to e-cigarettes may reduce their relative risk of tobacco-related disease. Effective nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes is important in consumer acceptance. We assessed whether protonated nicotine and e-cigarette devices delivering greater aerosol mass increase nicotine delivery and product liking. A randomised controlled non-blinded eight-arm crossover study was used to assess plasma nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking for two e-cigarettes (Vype ePen3 and Vype ePen) with various nicotine e-liquid formulations and a conventional cigarette among 24 healthy dual-users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Product use and puff count were also assessed. Results show that nicotine bioavailability was greater for Vype ePen3 with greater aerosol mass delivery than for Vype ePen (C, p = 0.0073; AUC, p = 0.0102). Protonated nicotine (18 mg/mL, medium protonation) e-liquid yielded higher nicotine bioavailability than unprotonated nicotine (18 mg/mL) e-liquid (C, p = 0.0001; AUC, p = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in T between e-liquids. Nicotine bioavailability did not differ between nicotine benzoate formulation (30 mg/mL nicotine, high protonation) and combustible cigarettes (C, p = 0.79; AUC, p = 0.13). Vype ePen3 with protonated nicotine delivers nicotine more efficiently with the potential to increase product liking relative to earlier devices using unprotonated e-liquid.

摘要

完全改用电子烟的吸烟者可能会降低与烟草相关疾病的相对风险。电子烟有效传递尼古丁对于消费者接受度很重要。我们评估了质子化尼古丁和输送更多气溶胶质量的电子烟设备是否会增加尼古丁输送和产品接受度。一项随机对照非盲八臂交叉研究用于评估两种电子烟(Vype ePen3 和 Vype ePen)与常规香烟之间的血浆尼古丁药代动力学和产品接受度,这两种电子烟具有不同的尼古丁电子烟液配方,供 24 名同时使用香烟和电子烟的健康双重使用者使用。还评估了产品使用情况和吸嘴计数。结果表明,与输送较少气溶胶质量的 Vype ePen 相比,Vype ePen3 的尼古丁生物利用度更高(C,p=0.0073;AUC,p=0.0102)。与未质子化尼古丁(18mg/mL)电子烟液相比,质子化尼古丁(18mg/mL,中等质子化)电子烟液的尼古丁生物利用度更高(C,p=0.0001;AUC,p=0.0026)。两种电子烟液之间的 T 没有显著差异。尼古丁苯甲酸酯配方(30mg/mL 尼古丁,高质子化)与可燃香烟之间的尼古丁生物利用度没有差异(C,p=0.79;AUC,p=0.13)。与早期使用未质子化电子烟液的设备相比,使用质子化尼古丁的 Vype ePen3 更有效地输送尼古丁,有可能增加产品接受度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验