• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将营养融入肿瘤门诊治疗—NutriCare 项目的一项试点试验。

Integrating Nutrition into Outpatient Oncology Care-A Pilot Trial of the NutriCare Program.

机构信息

Department of Health and Nutritional Science, Institute of Technology Sligo, FP1 YW50 Sligo, Ireland.

Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Nov 23;12(11):3590. doi: 10.3390/nu12113590.

DOI:10.3390/nu12113590
PMID:33238490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7700247/
Abstract

Nutrition is an essential part of oncology care; however, nutrition advice and guidance are not always provided. This six-week pilot pretest-posttest intervention was designed to test the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating a nutrition education program (NutriCare) into outpatient oncology care. Twenty breast cancer survivors were recruited through Tufts Medical Centre. Nutrition impact symptoms and demographics were collected at baseline, dietary quality and quality of life measures were collected pre and post-intervention and an evaluation form was completed post-intervention. Forty-four percent of eligible participants were recruited, and 90% of those completed the study. The NutriCare program was well received with participants reporting that goals were feasible (94.4%), the program had a positive impact on their diet (77.8%), and over 80% would recommend the program. There was an interest in continuing with the program (89%) and in receiving additional guidance from the healthcare team (83%). There was a significant improvement ( = 0.04) in physical function over the six weeks; however, no additional significant differences in quality of life or dietary quality were seen. In conclusion, cancer survivors were positive about the NutriCare program and its integration into practice.

摘要

营养是肿瘤学护理的重要组成部分;然而,并非总是提供营养建议和指导。这项为期六周的试点预测试后干预研究旨在测试将营养教育计划(NutriCare)整合到门诊肿瘤护理中的可行性和有效性。通过塔夫茨医疗中心招募了 20 名乳腺癌幸存者。在基线时收集营养影响症状和人口统计学数据,在干预前后收集饮食质量和生活质量测量数据,并在干预后完成评估表。招募了 44%的合格参与者,其中 90%完成了研究。NutriCare 计划受到了参与者的好评,他们报告说目标是可行的(94.4%),该计划对他们的饮食有积极影响(77.8%),超过 80%的人会推荐该计划。参与者表示有兴趣继续参加该计划(89%)并希望从医疗团队获得更多指导(83%)。在六周内,身体功能有显著改善( = 0.04);然而,生活质量或饮食质量没有出现其他显著差异。总之,癌症幸存者对 NutriCare 计划及其在实践中的整合持积极态度。

相似文献

1
Integrating Nutrition into Outpatient Oncology Care-A Pilot Trial of the NutriCare Program.将营养融入肿瘤门诊治疗—NutriCare 项目的一项试点试验。
Nutrients. 2020 Nov 23;12(11):3590. doi: 10.3390/nu12113590.
2
Perceptions of Oncology Providers and Cancer Survivors on the Role of Nutrition in Cancer Care and Their Views on the "NutriCare" Program.肿瘤学医护人员和癌症幸存者对营养在癌症护理中的作用的看法以及他们对“营养护理”项目的观点。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 30;12(5):1277. doi: 10.3390/nu12051277.
3
Cooking for Vitality: Pilot Study of an Innovative Culinary Nutrition Intervention for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors.烹饪焕发活力:癌症幸存者相关疲劳的创新性烹饪营养干预的初步研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 10;12(9):2760. doi: 10.3390/nu12092760.
4
Head and neck cancer survivors' preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention.头颈部癌症幸存者对治疗后饮食干预的偏好和评价。
Nutr J. 2019 Sep 10;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0479-6.
5
Health services research in colorectal cancer: a quasi-experimental interventional pilot study on in- and outpatient oncology.结直肠癌的卫生服务研究:一项关于门诊和住院肿瘤学的准实验性干预性试点研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;147(6):1789-1802. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03454-w. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
An exercise and nutrition intervention for ovarian cancer patients during and after first-line chemotherapy (BENITA study): a randomized controlled pilot trial.一项针对一线化疗期间和之后卵巢癌患者的运动和营养干预(BENITA 研究):一项随机对照初步试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Apr;30(4):541-545. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000585. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Effectiveness of Tailored Dietary Counseling in Treating Malnourished Outpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于个体化饮食指导的慢性阻塞性肺疾病营养不良门诊患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 May;120(5):778-791.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Nutrition Literacy among Cancer Survivors: Feasibility Results from the Healthy Eating and Living Against Breast Cancer (HEAL-BCa) Study: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症幸存者的营养素养:“对抗乳腺癌的健康饮食与生活”(HEAL-BCa)研究的可行性结果:一项试点随机对照试验
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec;33(6):1239-1249. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1238-z.
9
Best Evidence to Best Practice: Implementing an Innovative Model of Nutrition Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improves Outcomes.最佳证据至最佳实践:实施头颈癌患者营养护理创新模式可改善结局。
Nutrients. 2020 May 19;12(5):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu12051465.
10
Nutrition support using the American Dietetic Association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice.与标准做法相比,采用美国饮食协会医学营养治疗方案对肿瘤放疗患者进行营养支持可改善其饮食摄入量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Nutrition for Cancer Survivors.癌症幸存者的营养
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 1;14(19):4093. doi: 10.3390/nu14194093.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of Oncology Providers and Cancer Survivors on the Role of Nutrition in Cancer Care and Their Views on the "NutriCare" Program.肿瘤学医护人员和癌症幸存者对营养在癌症护理中的作用的看法以及他们对“营养护理”项目的观点。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 30;12(5):1277. doi: 10.3390/nu12051277.
2
Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors.成年癌症幸存者的饮食干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 22;2019(11):CD011287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011287.pub2.
3
Development of an Evidence-based Nutritional Intervention Protocol for Adolescent Athletes.
青少年运动员循证营养干预方案的制定
J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2019 Sep 30;23(3):29-38. doi: 10.20463/jenb.2019.0020.
4
Effects of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic-preliminary results.癌症康复诊所的效果——初步结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2381-2388. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05067-7. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
The effectiveness of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition-related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于应用程序的移动干预措施对营养行为和营养相关健康结果的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2019 Oct;20(10):1465-1484. doi: 10.1111/obr.12903. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
6
Factors that contribute to effective online nutrition education interventions: a systematic review.有助于有效在线营养教育干预的因素:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2019 Oct 1;77(10):663-690. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz032.
7
The Alternative Healthy Eating Index and Physical Function Impairment in Men.替代健康饮食指数与男性身体功能障碍。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(5):459-465. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1185-y.
8
Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015.更新后的健康饮食指数:HEI-2015。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021.
9
Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) Scoring System.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)偏好评分系统:基于偏好的总结评分估算。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Aug;38(6):683-698. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18776637. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Cardiovascular Risk in Cancer Survivors.癌症幸存者的心血管风险
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Apr 28;20(6):47. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0645-8.