• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Best Evidence to Best Practice: Implementing an Innovative Model of Nutrition Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improves Outcomes.最佳证据至最佳实践:实施头颈癌患者营养护理创新模式可改善结局。
Nutrients. 2020 May 19;12(5):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu12051465.
2
Translating Evidence-Based Guidelines into Practice-Are We Getting It Right? A Multi-Centre Prospective International Audit of Nutrition Care in Patients with Foregut Tumors (INFORM).将循证指南转化为实践——我们做对了吗?一项针对前肠肿瘤患者营养护理的多中心前瞻性国际审计(INFORM)。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 11;12(12):3808. doi: 10.3390/nu12123808.
3
"Completely and utterly flummoxed and out of my depth": patient and caregiver experiences during and after treatment for head and neck cancer-a qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to best-practice nutrition care.“完全困惑和不知所措”:头颈部癌症治疗期间和治疗后的患者和护理人员的体验——对最佳实践营养护理的障碍和促进因素的定性评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):5771-5780. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05386-0. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
"There's a lot of talent in the room but it's only really the medical talent that gets heard": a qualitative exploration of multidisciplinary clinicians' perspectives of optimal nutrition care of patients with head and neck cancer.“房间里有很多人才,但只有真正的医学人才才能被听到”:一项定性研究探讨了多学科临床医生对头颈部癌症患者最佳营养护理的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6399-6409. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06162-4. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Nutritional management in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.头颈癌的营养管理:英国国家多学科指南
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S32-S40. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000402.
6
Nutritional outcomes with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a before and after comparison of 'best practice guidelines' implementation.头颈部癌放疗的营养结局:“最佳实践指南”实施前后的比较
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(5):955-961. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.122017.05.
7
Effectiveness of clinical practice change strategies in improving dietitian care for head and neck cancer patients according to evidence-based clinical guidelines: a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial.基于循证临床指南改善营养师对头颈部癌症患者护理的临床实践改变策略的效果:一项 stepped-wedge、随机对照试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):166-174. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx016.
8
Establishing a Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Clinical Pathway: An Implementation Evaluation and Audit of Dysphagia-Related Services and Outcomes.建立多学科头颈部临床路径:吞咽障碍相关服务和结局的实施评估和审核。
Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):89-104. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9917-4. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Audit of nutritional guidelines for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.对头颈部癌症放疗患者营养指南的审核。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005 Oct;18(5):343-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00632.x.
10
Prevention and Treatment of Malnutrition in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care or the Community: An Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline.老年人长期护理或社区中营养不良的预防和治疗:基于证据的营养实践指南。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 Jul;124(7):896-916.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.03.013. Epub 2024 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.医疗保健中仪表板的开发、实施和评估方法:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Dec 10;12:e59828. doi: 10.2196/59828.
2
A rapid review of nutrition and exercise approaches to managing unintentional weight loss, muscle loss, and malnutrition in cancer.关于管理癌症患者非故意体重减轻、肌肉流失和营养不良的营养与运动方法的快速综述。
Oncologist. 2024 Oct 7. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae261.
3
More patient-centered care, better healthcare: the association between patient-centered care and healthcare outcomes in inpatients.更以患者为中心的护理,更好的医疗保健:以患者为中心的护理与住院患者医疗效果之间的关联。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 19;11:1148277. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1148277. eCollection 2023.
4
The roles of the dietitian in an 18-week telephone and mobile application nutrition intervention for upper gastrointestinal cancer: a qualitative analysis.营养师在为期 18 周的上消化道癌症电话和移动应用营养干预中的作用:定性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 29;31(4):245. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07684-9.
5
A Multi-Site, International Audit of Malnutrition Risk and Energy and Protein Intakes in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Head Neck and Esophageal Cancer: Results from INFORM.多中心、国际头颈部和食管癌患者营养不良风险及能量和蛋白质摄入审计:INFORM 研究结果。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 10;14(24):5272. doi: 10.3390/nu14245272.
6
Implementing a standardised perioperative nutrition care pathway in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a mixed-methods analysis of implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.在上消化道癌症手术中实施标准化围手术期营养护理途径:使用实施综合框架进行实施的混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 25;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07466-9.
7
Clinical practice guidelines on nutrition management in head and neck cancer: a systematic quality appraisal using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation 2nd edition instrument.头颈部癌症营养管理临床实践指南:使用评估指南研究与评估工具(AGREE II)进行系统质量评价。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Jan;137(1):37-43. doi: 10.1017/S002221512200055X. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
Nutritional status and skeletal muscle status in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on outcomes.头颈部癌症患者的营养状况和骨骼肌状况:对结局的影响。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):2187-2198. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12829. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
Preoperative Nutrition Intervention in Patients Undergoing Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: Results from the Multi-Centre NOURISH Point Prevalence Study.术前营养干预在上消化道癌症切除患者中的应用:多中心 NOURISH 点患病率研究结果。
Nutrients. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):3205. doi: 10.3390/nu13093205.
10
Integrating Academic and Community Cancer Care and Research through Multidisciplinary Oncology Pathways for Value-Based Care: A Review and the City of Hope Experience.通过多学科肿瘤学途径整合学术与社区癌症护理及研究以实现基于价值的护理:综述与希望之城的经验
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 7;10(2):188. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020188.

本文引用的文献

1
"Completely and utterly flummoxed and out of my depth": patient and caregiver experiences during and after treatment for head and neck cancer-a qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to best-practice nutrition care.“完全困惑和不知所措”:头颈部癌症治疗期间和治疗后的患者和护理人员的体验——对最佳实践营养护理的障碍和促进因素的定性评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):5771-5780. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05386-0. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Validated screening tools for the assessment of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition: a systematic review.用于评估恶病质、肌肉减少症和营养不良的经过验证的筛选工具:系统评价。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec 1;108(6):1196-1208. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy244.
3
The Impact of Visualization Dashboards on Quality of Care and Clinician Satisfaction: Integrative Literature Review.可视化仪表盘对医疗质量和临床医生满意度的影响:综合文献综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 May 31;5(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9328.
4
Closing the Gap in Nutrition Care at Outpatient Cancer Centers: Ongoing Initiatives of the Oncology Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group.缩小门诊癌症中心营养护理的差距:肿瘤营养饮食实践小组的现行举措。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;118(4):749-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.010.
5
Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes.基于医院的干预措施:对实施过程中员工报告的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 23;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0726-9.
6
Head and neck cancer patient experience of a new dietitian-delivered health behaviour intervention: 'you know you have to eat to survive'.头颈部癌症患者对新营养师提供的健康行为干预的体验:“你知道你必须吃东西才能生存”。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jul;26(7):2167-2175. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4029-5. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
7
Effectiveness of clinical practice change strategies in improving dietitian care for head and neck cancer patients according to evidence-based clinical guidelines: a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial.基于循证临床指南改善营养师对头颈部癌症患者护理的临床实践改变策略的效果:一项 stepped-wedge、随机对照试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):166-174. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx016.
8
ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition.ESPEN 专家组关于癌症相关营养不良问题行动的建议。
Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document.报告实施研究的标准(StaRI):解释和说明文件。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):e013318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318.
10
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement.报告实施研究的标准(StaRI)声明。
BMJ. 2017 Mar 6;356:i6795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6795.

最佳证据至最佳实践:实施头颈癌患者营养护理创新模式可改善结局。

Best Evidence to Best Practice: Implementing an Innovative Model of Nutrition Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improves Outcomes.

机构信息

Cancer Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 May 19;12(5):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu12051465.

DOI:10.3390/nu12051465
PMID:32438607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7284331/
Abstract

Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), impacting outcomes. Despite publication of nutrition care evidence-based guidelines (EBGs), evidence-practice gaps exist. This study aimed to implement and evaluate the integration of a patient-centred, best-practice dietetic model of care into an HNC multidisciplinary team (MDT) to minimise the detrimental sequelae of malnutrition. A mixed-methods, pre-post study design was used to deliver key interventions underpinned by evidence-based implementation strategies to address identified barriers and facilitators to change at individual, team and system levels. A data audit of medical records established baseline adherence to EBGs and clinical parameters prior to implementation in a prospective cohort. Key interventions included a weekly Supportive Care-Led Pre-Treatment Clinic and a Nutrition Care Dashboard highlighting nutrition outcome data integrated into MDT meetings. Focus groups provided team-level evaluation of the new model of care. Economic analysis determined system-level impact. The baseline clinical audit (n = 98) revealed barriers including reactive nutrition care, lack of familiarity with EBGs or awareness of intensive nutrition care needs as well as infrastructure and dietetic resource limitations. Post-implementation data (n = 34) demonstrated improved process and clinical outcomes: pre-treatment dietitian assessment; use of a validated nutrition assessment tool before, during and after treatment. Patients receiving the new model of care were significantly more likely to complete prescribed radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Differences in mean percentage weight change were clinically relevant. At the system level, the new model of care avoided 3.92 unplanned admissions and related costs of $AUD121K per annum. Focus groups confirmed clear support at the multidisciplinary team level for continuing the new model of care. Implementing an evidence-based nutrition model of care in patients with HNC is feasible and can improve outcomes. Benefits of this model of care may be transferrable to other patient groups within cancer settings.

摘要

营养不良在头颈部癌症(HNC)患者中很普遍,影响治疗效果。尽管已经发布了营养护理循证指南(EBG),但仍然存在证据与实践之间的差距。本研究旨在将以患者为中心的最佳实践饮食护理模式整合到 HNC 多学科团队(MDT)中,以最大程度地减少营养不良的不良后果。采用混合方法的前后研究设计,结合基于证据的实施策略,针对个人、团队和系统层面上的障碍和促进因素,实施关键干预措施。在实施前瞻性队列研究之前,对病历进行数据审核,以确定 EBG 和临床参数的基线依从性。关键干预措施包括每周的支持性护理主导的治疗前诊所和营养护理仪表板,突出显示整合到 MDT 会议中的营养结果数据。焦点小组提供了团队层面的新护理模式的评估。经济分析确定了系统层面的影响。基线临床审计(n = 98)揭示了障碍,包括反应性营养护理、对 EBG 的不熟悉或对强化营养护理需求的认识、基础设施和饮食资源限制。实施后的数据(n = 34)显示出了改善的过程和临床结果:治疗前营养师评估;在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后使用经过验证的营养评估工具。接受新模式护理的患者更有可能完成规定的放疗和系统治疗。体重变化百分比的平均差异具有临床意义。在系统层面上,新模式的护理避免了 3.92 例非计划性入院和每年 121,000 澳元的相关费用。焦点小组在多学科团队层面上确认了对继续新模式护理的明确支持。在头颈部癌症患者中实施基于证据的营养护理模式是可行的,并且可以改善治疗效果。这种护理模式的好处可能适用于癌症环境中的其他患者群体。