Henriksen Morten
Ministry of Defence, Karup, Denmark.
AAU Business School, The Faculty of Social Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 6;11:549187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549187. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this paper is to offer a new framework for understanding action, optimization, and choice when applied to economic theory more generally. By drawing upon the concept known as the variational free energy principle, the paper will explore how this principle can be used to temper rational choice theory by re-formulating how agents optimize. The approach will result in agent behavior that encompasses a wide range of so-called cognitive biases, as seen in the scientific literature of behavioral economics, but instead of using these biases as further indications of market inefficiencies or market failures, the paper will likewise attempt to show the limits to which these biases can inform or critique standard economic theory. The paper therefore offers up a "middle of the road" approach, in which the neoclassical agent is not quite as "rational" as rational choice theory assumes, but at the same time, not quite as irrational as behavioral economics would often have us believe.
本文的目的是提供一个新的框架,以便在更广泛地应用于经济理论时理解行动、优化和选择。通过借鉴所谓的变分自由能原理这一概念,本文将探讨如何通过重新构建主体优化的方式,利用该原理来修正理性选择理论。这种方法将导致主体行为包含行为经济学科学文献中所见到的一系列所谓认知偏差,但本文不会将这些偏差用作市场无效率或市场失灵的进一步迹象,而是同样试图展示这些偏差对标准经济理论进行阐释或批判的限度。因此,本文提出了一种“中间路线”方法,在这种方法中,新古典主体并不像理性选择理论所假设的那样“理性”,但同时,也不像行为经济学常常让我们认为的那样不理性。