Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health Sciences, Section of General Practice & Research Unit for General Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Primary Healthcare Research Unit Region Zealand, Sorø, Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Dec;38(4):439-446. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1843826. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
Prostate cancer is a frequently diagnosed cancer and made up 6% of male cancer deaths globally in 2008. Its incidence varies more than 25-fold worldwide, which is primarily attributed to the implementation of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in developed countries. To reduce harm of overdiagnosis, most international guidelines recommend surveillance programmes. However, this approach can entail negative psychosocial consequences from being under surveillance for an (over)diagnosed prostate cancer.
To explore men's feelings and experiences in a surveillance programme.
Qualitative study with Danish men diagnosed with asymptomatic prostate cancer Gleason score ≤ 6, who are in a surveillance programme.
12 semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted and analysed with systematic text condensation and selected theories.
Most informants reported that they were astonished at the time of diagnosis. They were aware of the small likelihood of dying from cancer, but in some cases, the uncertainty created ambivalence between knowing and not knowing. The men expressed their risk awareness in different ways: a realization that life does not last forever, uncertainty towards the future, a feeling of powerlessness, and a need for control.
The men in this study had substantial psychosocial consequences from being labelled with a cancer diagnosis. Bearing these men's high risk of overdiagnosis in mind, it is important to discuss whether the harms of this diagnosis outweigh the benefits. The psychosocial consequences of being in a prostate cancer surveillance programme should be explored further. KEY POINTS Current awareness: The number of men living with an asymptomatic prostate cancer has increased the last 20 years after the implementation of the PSA test. Main Statements: Men living with an asymptomatic, low-risk prostate cancer experience negative psychocosial consequences GPs should consider the possible negative psychosocial consequences in their decision-making of measuring the PSA level.
前列腺癌是一种常见的癌症,2008 年占全球男性癌症死亡人数的 6%。其发病率在全球范围内差异超过 25 倍,这主要归因于发达国家实施了前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测。为了减少过度诊断的危害,大多数国际指南建议进行监测计划。然而,这种方法可能会给被诊断为前列腺癌(过度)的患者带来负面的心理社会后果。
探讨男性在监测计划中的感受和体验。
对丹麦患有无症状前列腺癌 Gleason 评分≤6 的男性进行的定性研究,这些男性正在接受监测计划。
进行了 12 次半结构化的个体访谈,并使用系统文本浓缩和选定的理论进行了分析。
大多数受访者在诊断时感到惊讶。他们知道自己死于癌症的可能性很小,但在某些情况下,这种不确定性导致了对知道和不知道的矛盾心理。男性以不同的方式表达了他们的风险意识:意识到生命不会永远持续下去,对未来的不确定性,无能为力的感觉,以及对控制的需求。
本研究中的男性因被诊断出患有癌症而承受了重大的心理社会后果。考虑到这些男性过度诊断的高风险,重要的是要讨论这种诊断的危害是否大于益处。前列腺癌监测计划中存在的心理社会后果应进一步探讨。
当前认识:在 PSA 检测实施后的 20 年里,患有无症状前列腺癌的男性人数有所增加。
主要发现:患有无症状、低风险前列腺癌的男性会经历负面的心理社会后果。
临床医生应在决定测量 PSA 水平时考虑到可能存在的负面心理社会后果。