Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Cell Tissue Res. 2021 Mar;383(3):1061-1075. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03315-5. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have been used as an alternative to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone tissue engineering. However, the efficacy of ASC in bone regeneration in comparison with BMSC remains debatable, since inconsistent results have been reported. Comparing ASC with BMSC obtained from different individuals might contribute to this inconsistency in results. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human ASC and BMSC seeded onto poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using calvarial bone defects in nude rats. First, donor-matched ASC and BMSC were seeded onto the co-polymer scaffolds to evaluate their in vitro osteogenic differentiation. Seeded scaffolds and scaffolds without cells (control) were then implanted in calvarial defects in nude rats. The expression of osteogenesis-related genes was examined after 4 weeks. Cellular activity was investigated after 4 and 12 weeks. Bone formation was evaluated radiographically and histologically after 4, 12, and 24 weeks. In vitro, ASC and BMSC demonstrated mineralization. However, BMSC showed higher alkaline phosphatase activity than ASC. In vivo, human osteogenesis-related genes Runx2 and collagen type I were expressed in defects with scaffold/cells. Defects with scaffold/BMSC had higher cellular activity than defects with scaffold/ASC. Moreover, bone formation in defects with scaffold/BMSC was greater than in defects with scaffold/ASC, especially at the early time-point. These results suggest that although ASC have the potential to regenerate bone, the rate of bone regeneration with ASC may be slower than with BMSC. Accordingly, BMSC are more suitable for bone regenerative applications.
脂肪来源的干细胞(ASC)已被用作骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSC)的替代品,用于骨组织工程。然而,ASC 在骨再生方面的功效与 BMSC 相比仍存在争议,因为已有报道结果不一致。将 ASC 与来自不同个体的 BMSC 进行比较可能是导致结果不一致的原因之一。因此,本研究旨在使用裸鼠颅骨骨缺损比较供体匹配的人 ASC 和 BMSC 接种到聚(L-丙交酯-co-ε-己内酯)支架上的骨再生能力。首先,将供体匹配的 ASC 和 BMSC 接种到共聚物支架上,以评估其体外成骨分化能力。然后将接种有细胞的支架和没有细胞的支架(对照)植入裸鼠颅骨缺损处。在第 4 周时检测成骨相关基因的表达。在第 4 和 12 周时研究细胞活性。在第 4、12 和 24 周时通过影像学和组织学评估骨形成。体外实验中,ASC 和 BMSC 均表现出矿化。然而,BMSC 的碱性磷酸酶活性高于 ASC。在体内,支架/细胞缺陷处表达了人成骨相关基因 Runx2 和胶原蛋白 I。支架/BMSC 缺陷处的细胞活性高于支架/ASC 缺陷处。此外,支架/BMSC 缺陷处的骨形成大于支架/ASC 缺陷处,尤其是在早期。这些结果表明,尽管 ASC 具有再生骨的潜力,但 ASC 再生骨的速度可能比 BMSC 慢。因此,BMSC 更适合骨再生应用。