• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响南亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制目标达标率的因素:CARRS 试验分析。

Factors affecting achievement of glycemic targets among type 2 diabetes patients in South Asia: Analysis of the CARRS trial.

机构信息

Aga Khan University, Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.

Public Health Foundation of India, 4th Floor, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon 122 002, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jan;171:108555. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108555. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108555
PMID:33242515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7854496/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictors of achieving and maintaining guideline-recommended glycemic control in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Centre for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia (CARRS) Trial (n = 1146), to identify groups that achieved guideline-recommended glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%) and those that remained persistently poorly controlled (HbA1c > 9%) over a median of 28 months of follow-up. We used generalized estimation equations (GEE) analysis for each outcome i.e. achieving guideline-recommended control and persistently poorly controlled and constructed four regression models (demographics, disease-related, self-care, and other risk factors) separately to identify predictors of HbA1c < 7% and HbA1c > 9% at the end of the trial, adjusting for trial group assignment and site.

RESULTS

In the final multivariate model, adherence to prescribed medications (RR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.95), adherence to diet plans (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.23) and middle-aged: 50-64 years (RR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.02-1.71) were associated with achieving guideline-recommended control (HbA1c < 7%). Presence of microvascular complications (RR: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.92) reduced the probability of achieving guideline-recommended glycemic control (HbA1c 7%). Further, longer duration of diabetes (>15 years), RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72, hyperlipidemia, RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34 and younger age group (35-49 years vs. >64 years: RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79) were associated with persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 9%).

CONCLUSION

To achieve and maintain guideline-recommended glycemic control, care delivery models must put additional emphasis and effort on patients with longer disease duration, younger people and those having microvascular complications and hyperlipidemia.

摘要

目的

评估血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者达到和维持指南推荐血糖控制的预测因素。

方法

我们分析了南亚心血管代谢风险降低中心(CARRS)试验(n=1146)的数据,以确定在中位 28 个月的随访期间达到指南推荐血糖控制(HbA1c<7%)和持续血糖控制不佳(HbA1c>9%)的人群。我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)分析了每个结局,即达到指南推荐的控制和持续血糖控制不佳,并分别构建了四个回归模型(人口统计学、疾病相关、自我护理和其他危险因素),以确定试验结束时 HbA1c<7%和 HbA1c>9%的预测因素,调整了试验组分配和地点。

结果

在最终的多变量模型中,遵医嘱服药(RR:1.46,95%CI:1.09,1.95)、遵饮食计划(RR:1.79,95%CI:1.43,2.23)和中年(50-64 岁)(RR:1.32;95%CI:1.02-1.71)与达到指南推荐的控制(HbA1c<7%)有关。存在微血管并发症(RR:0.70;95%CI:0.53-0.92)降低了达到指南推荐的血糖控制的可能性(HbA1c<7%)。此外,糖尿病病程较长(>15 年)(RR:1.41;95%CI:1.15,1.72)、血脂异常(RR:1.19;95%CI:1.06,1.34)和年龄较小(35-49 岁与>64 岁:RR:0.61;95%CI:0.47-0.79)与持续血糖控制不佳(HbA1c>9%)有关。

结论

为了达到和维持指南推荐的血糖控制,护理提供模式必须更加重视和努力治疗病程较长、年龄较小、有微血管并发症和血脂异常的患者。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting achievement of glycemic targets among type 2 diabetes patients in South Asia: Analysis of the CARRS trial.影响南亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制目标达标率的因素:CARRS 试验分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jan;171:108555. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108555. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Effect of a multicomponent quality improvement strategy on sustained achievement of diabetes care goals and macrovascular and microvascular complications in South Asia at 6.5 years follow-up: Post hoc analyses of the CARRS randomized clinical trial.多组分质量改进策略对南亚糖尿病护理目标和大血管及微血管并发症持续达成的影响:CARRS 随机临床试验的事后分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jun 3;21(6):e1004335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004335. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Rate and risk factors of kidney function decline among South Asians with type 2 diabetes: analysis of the CARRS Trial.2 型糖尿病南亚人群肾功能下降的速率和风险因素:CARRS 试验分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Aug 16;12(4):e004218. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004218.
4
Effect of a multicomponent intervention on achievement and improvements in quality-of-care indices among people with Type 2 diabetes in South Asia: the CARRS trial.多组分干预对南亚 2 型糖尿病患者达标和改善医疗质量指数的影响:CARRS 试验。
Diabet Med. 2020 Nov;37(11):1825-1831. doi: 10.1111/dme.14124. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
5
Achievement of guideline targets of glycemic and non-glycemic parameters in North Indian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A retrospective analysis.印度北部 2 型糖尿病患者血糖和非血糖参数达标情况的回顾性分析。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Jan-Feb;15(1):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with exenatide once weekly versus oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin glargine: achievement of glycemic and cardiovascular goals.每周一次给予 exenatide 治疗 2 型糖尿病患者与口服降糖药物或甘精胰岛素治疗相比:实现血糖和心血管目标。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Mar 23;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-48.
7
Association of Potentially Modifiable Diabetes Care Factors With Glycemic Control in Patients With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.可能可调整的糖尿病护理因素与接受胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919645. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19645.
8
Evaluation of an mHealth-enabled hierarchical diabetes management intervention in primary care in China (ROADMAP): A cluster randomized trial.评估移动医疗支持的中国基层医疗中分级糖尿病管理干预(ROADMAP):一项群组随机试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 21;18(9):e1003754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003754. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Metabolic memory: Evolving concepts.代谢记忆:不断发展的概念。
J Diabetes. 2018 Mar;10(3):186-187. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12622. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Glycemic and non-glycemic targets in younger and older North Indian subjects with type 2 diabetes in a Tertiary care hospital: A 10 year's retrospective data analysis.三级护理医院中北印度年轻和老年2型糖尿病患者的血糖和非血糖目标:一项10年回顾性数据分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1 Suppl 1):S130-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative assessment of treatment outcomes of empagliflozin add-on metformin and sitagliptin add-on metformin therapies in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from an observational study in Pakistan.恩格列净联合二甲双胍与西格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效比较评估:巴基斯坦一项观察性研究的结果
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Aug 21;44(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01041-8.
2
Rate and risk factors of kidney function decline among South Asians with type 2 diabetes: analysis of the CARRS Trial.2 型糖尿病南亚人群肾功能下降的速率和风险因素:CARRS 试验分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Aug 16;12(4):e004218. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004218.
3
The effect of close and intensive therapeutic monitoring of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes with different glycemic background.不同血糖背景下,对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者进行密切和强化治疗监测的效果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36680. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036680.
4
Prevalence and risk factors associated with undiagnosed diabetes in India: Insights from NFHS-5 national survey.印度未确诊糖尿病的患病率及相关风险因素:来自 NFHS-5 全国调查的见解。
J Glob Health. 2023 Dec 8;13:04135. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04135.
5
Prevalence of anemia in diabetes mellitus in South Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.南亚糖尿病患者贫血的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0285336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285336. eCollection 2023.
6
Glycaemic control in diabetes - Bridging the gap.糖尿病的血糖控制——弥合差距。
Indian J Med Res. 2020 Nov;152(5):439-441. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4719_20.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol in Diabetes.2018年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心血管和肺康复协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏协会高血压委员会/美国预防医学学院/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会/美国国家脂质协会/美国初级保健医师学会糖尿病患者血脂管理指南
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1673-1678. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0036.
2
New American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines for the pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes: Placing them into a practicing physician's perspective.美国糖尿病协会(ADA)/欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)2型糖尿病药物治疗新指南:从执业医师角度解读
Metabolism. 2020 Jun;107:154218. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154218. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
3
Age and Age-old Disparities in Diabetes Care Persist.糖尿病护理方面的年龄及长期存在的差异依然存在。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1386-1387. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2392.
4
Predictors of poor glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes on follow-up care at a tertiary healthcare setting in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚一家三级医疗机构中接受后续护理的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的预测因素。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Apr 4;12(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4248-6.
5
The increasing burden of diabetes and variations among the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016.糖尿病负担日益加重,印度各邦情况不一:1990-2016 年全球疾病负担研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Dec;6(12):e1352-e1362. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30387-5. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
The Legacy Effect in Type 2 Diabetes: Impact of Early Glycemic Control on Future Complications (The Diabetes & Aging Study).2 型糖尿病的遗留效应:早期血糖控制对未来并发症的影响(糖尿病与衰老研究)。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):416-426. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1144. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990-2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study.一国之内的差异:1990-2016 年印度各邦的疾病流行转变的流行病学差异,全球疾病负担研究。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2437-2460. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32804-0. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
Glycemic control and associated factors among type 2 diabetic patients at Shanan Gibe Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部沙南吉贝医院2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制及相关因素
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 15;10(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2924-y.
9
Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes in 15 states of India: results from the ICMR-INDIAB population-based cross-sectional study.印度 15 个邦的糖尿病和糖尿病前期患病率:ICMR-INDIAB 基于人群的横断面研究结果。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Aug;5(8):585-596. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30174-2. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Quality Improvement Strategy to Improve Achievement of Diabetes Care Goals: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.一种多组分质量改进策略对改善糖尿病护理目标达成情况的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 20;165(6):399-408. doi: 10.7326/M15-2807. Epub 2016 Jul 12.