Boston University, School of Public Health, 715 Albany St., Boston MA 02118 USA; GoodBirth Network, California, 2577 Post Street, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA; United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Bangladesh, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, 8/A Begum Rokeya Sharani, IDB Bhaban (15th floor), E, Dhaka, 1207 Bangladesh.
GoodBirth Network, California, 2577 Post Street, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA; Harvard University, Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston MA 02115 USA.
Midwifery. 2021 Feb;93:102882. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102882. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
Midwifery centres have been identified in over 56 countries. Consensus was reached on a global definition for midwifery centres, yet there is a lack of standards to assure consistent quality of care is provided.
Evidence-based standards and guidelines developed from American Association of Birth Centres (USA), Midwifery Unity Network (UK/EU), World Health Organization, International Childbirth Initiative, and White Ribbon Alliance, were gathered, duplicate standards were removed, and language was adapted for global use with sensitivity to low and middle countries (LMIC). An initial list of 52 midwifery centre standards were identified. Through an informal modified Delphi process these were reviewed by global midwifery centres experts, researchers, and midwifery centre staff at focus groups in Haiti, Mexico and Bangladesh for significance, language, and usability. The standards were then piloted at midwifery centres in eight countries (Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Mexico, Haiti, Peru, Uganda and Trinidad). All feedback was incorporated into the final standards.
A final list of 43 standards, organized into 3 domains including quality standards for care providers, dignity standards for women, and community standards for administration, were agreed on.
Midwifery centres are prevalent around the globe. Identifying standards for quality of care provides a foundation for the midwifery centre model to be replicated and ensure consistent quality of care. Evidence based standards for midwifery centres in LMIC, allows systems to embrace and encourage the implementation and growth of midwifery centres to address accessible, acceptable, respectful, woman-centred, community-engaged maternal health care that participates fully in the health care system.
助产中心在 56 个以上的国家已经建立。全球范围内对助产中心达成了共识,然而,缺乏确保提供一致的高质量护理的标准。
从美国生育中心协会(美国)、助产统一网络(英国/欧盟)、世界卫生组织、国际生育倡议和白丝带联盟收集了循证标准和准则,删除了重复的标准,并根据低和中等收入国家(LMIC)的情况对语言进行了调整,以确保全球使用的敏感性。确定了最初的 52 项助产中心标准清单。通过非正式的改良德尔菲法,全球助产中心专家、研究人员和焦点小组的助产中心工作人员对这些标准进行了审查,以确定其重要性、语言和可用性。然后在 8 个国家(塞拉利昂、柬埔寨、孟加拉国、墨西哥、海地、秘鲁、乌干达和特立尼达)的助产中心进行了试点。所有反馈都纳入了最终标准。
确定了最终的 43 项标准,分为 3 个领域,包括护理提供者的质量标准、妇女的尊严标准和社区管理的标准。
助产中心在全球范围内普遍存在。确定护理质量标准为复制助产中心模式提供了基础,以确保一致的护理质量。为中低收入国家的助产中心制定循证标准,使系统能够接受并鼓励实施和发展助产中心,以解决可及性、可接受性、尊重性、以妇女为中心、社区参与的产妇保健问题,充分参与卫生保健系统。