Suppr超能文献

助产中心作为促进助产服务的环境:在孟加拉国三种模式的护理下,在新冠疫情前后评估妇女分娩体验的准实验设计。

Midwifery centers as enabled environments for midwifery: A quasi experimental design assessing women's birth experiences in three models of care in Bangladesh, before and during covid.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States of America.

James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278336. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The midwifery model of care is a human rights-based approach (HRBA) that is unique and appropriate for the majority of healthy pregnant women, yet full expression may be limited within the medical model. Midwifery centers are facilities designed specifically to enable the practice of midwifery. In high resource countries, they have been shown to be cost effective, evidence-based, avoid over medicalization, and provide safe, efficient and satisfying care.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact of three models of care on women's experiences of respect, and trust in maternity care provision, both before and during the pandemic in Bangladesh, as well as their fear and knowledge around COVID-19, during the pandemic. The models were: "fully enabled midwifery" ("FEM") in freestanding midwifery centers; "midwifery and medicine" ("MAM") in medical facilities with midwives working alongside nurses and doctors; and "no midwifery" ("NoM") in medical facilities without midwives. Phone survey data were collected and analyzed from all women (n = 1,191) who delivered from Jan 2020-June 2020 at seven health care facilities in Bangladesh. Comparison of means, ANOVA, post hoc Tukey, and effect size were used to explore the differences in outcomes across time periods.

FINDINGS

Pre-pandemic, women served by the FEM model reported significantly higher rates of trust and respect (p<0·001) compared to the NoM model, and significantly higher rates of trust (p<0·001) compared to MAM. During the pandemic, in the FEM model, the experiences of respect and trust did not change significantly from the pre-pandemic rates, and were significantly higher than both the MAM and NoM models (p < 0·001). Additionally, during the pandemic, women served by the FEM model had the lowest experience of COVID fear (p<0·001).

INTERPRETATION

Fully enabled midwifery in midwifery centers had a significantly positive effect on woman's experience of respect and trust in care compared to the other models, even in the context of a pandemic.

摘要

背景

以人权为基础的助产模式是一种独特且适合大多数健康孕妇的方法,但在医疗模式中可能受到限制。 助产中心是专门为实施助产而设计的设施。 在高资源国家,它们已被证明具有成本效益、基于证据、避免过度医疗化,并提供安全、高效和令人满意的护理。

方法

采用准实验设计评估了三种护理模式对孟加拉国妇女在大流行前后对产妇保健服务的尊重和信任体验的影响,以及在大流行期间对 COVID-19 的恐惧和知识的影响。 这些模式是:独立助产中心的“完全启用助产”(FEM);助产士与护士和医生一起在医疗设施中工作的“助产与医学”(MAM);以及没有助产士的医疗设施的“无助产”(NoM)。 从 2020 年 1 月至 6 月在孟加拉国的七家医疗保健机构分娩的所有妇女(n=1191)中收集并分析了电话调查数据。 使用比较均值、方差分析、事后 Tukey 和效应量来探索不同时间段结果的差异。

结果

在大流行前,与 NoM 模式相比,FEM 模式服务的妇女报告了更高的信任和尊重率(p<0·001),与 MAM 模式相比,信任率更高(p<0·001)。 在大流行期间,在 FEM 模式中,与大流行前相比,尊重和信任的体验没有明显变化,并且显著高于 MAM 和 NoM 模式(p < 0·001)。 此外,在大流行期间,FEM 模式服务的妇女的 COVID 恐惧体验最低(p<0·001)。

解释

与其他模式相比,即使在大流行背景下,助产中心的完全启用助产对妇女对护理的尊重和信任体验也有显著的积极影响。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Developing operational standards for Midwifery Centers.制定助产中心的业务标准。
Midwifery. 2021 Feb;93:102882. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102882. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
5
Commentary: Creating a definition for global midwifery centers.
Midwifery. 2020 Jun;85:102684. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102684. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
A framework for healthcare interventions to address maternal morbidity.针对产妇发病率的医疗干预框架。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 May;141 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):61-68. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12469.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验