Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Mallinkckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Jul;41(7):1658-1668. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20973951. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
We aimed to validate oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) estimations by quantitative susceptibility mapping plus quantitative blood oxygen-level dependence (QSM+qBOLD, or QQ) using O-PET. In ten healthy adult brains, PET and MRI were acquired simultaneously on a PET/MR scanner. PET was acquired using C[O], O[O], and H[O]. Image-derived arterial input functions and standard models of oxygen metabolism provided quantification of PET. MRI included T1-weighted imaging, time-of-flight angiography, and multi-echo gradient-echo imaging that was processed for QQ. Region of interest (ROI) analyses compared PET OEF and QQ OEF. In ROI analyses, the averaged OEF differences between PET and QQ were generally small and statistically insignificant. For whole brains, the average and standard deviation of OEF was 32.8 ± 6.7% for PET; OEF was 34.2 ± 2.6% for QQ. Bland-Altman plots quantified agreement between PET OEF and QQ OEF. The interval between the 95% limits of agreement was 16.9 ± 4.0% for whole brains. Our validation study suggests that respiratory challenge-free QQ-OEF mapping may be useful for non-invasive clinical assessment of regional OEF impairment.
我们旨在通过正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振(PET/MR)扫描仪验证基于定量磁化率图联合定量血氧水平依赖(QSM+qBOLD,简称 QQ)的氧摄取分数(OEF)估算值。在十名健康成人的大脑中,同时进行了 PET 和 MRI 采集。PET 采用 [C]O、[O]O 和 [H]O 进行采集。图像衍生的动脉输入函数和氧代谢标准模型提供了 PET 的定量结果。MRI 包括 T1 加权成像、时飞血管造影术和多回波梯度回波成像,这些图像用于 QQ 处理。感兴趣区(ROI)分析比较了 PET 和 QQ 的 OEF。在 ROI 分析中,PET 和 QQ 之间的 OEF 平均差异通常较小且无统计学意义。对于整个大脑,PET 的 OEF 平均值和标准差为 32.8±6.7%;QQ 的 OEF 平均值和标准差为 34.2±2.6%。Bland-Altman 图量化了 PET 和 QQ 之间 OEF 的一致性。全脑 95%一致性界限的间隔为 16.9±4.0%。我们的验证研究表明,无需呼吸挑战的 QQ-OEF 映射可能有助于非侵入性临床评估区域性 OEF 损伤。