• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用社会关系图来刻画跨专业团队碰头会期间的沟通情况。

Using a Sociogram to Characterize Communication During an Interprofessional Team Huddle.

作者信息

Royse Lisa, Nolan Nathanial, Hoffman Kimberly

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 17;13:1583-1593. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S273746. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S273746
PMID:33244236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7683826/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The complexity of modern medicine requires high-performance teamwork to ensure quality care. Teams rely on communication patterns that are replicable and efficient. The purpose of this observational study was to characterize communication dynamics among interprofessional team members during a team huddle. The study aimed to (a) characterize communication within structured huddles on an inpatient medicine unit by evaluating who talked and to whom and what types of communication took place during each interaction and (b) explore participants' perceptions of the huddles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a sociogram to diagram direct observations of the structure and patterns of group interaction. Through the sociogram, we documented the flow and frequency of team members information exchange, questions, and requests. We conducted two follow-up focus groups-one with residents and one with nurses.

RESULTS

The most frequent type of interaction observed was information exchange: nurse to resident (28.3%) and resident to nurse (47%). Both residents and nurses asked questions: nurse to resident (7.4%) and resident to nurse (14.2%). Nurses made more requests of residents (2.8%) than vice versa (0.3%). Four themes emerged from focus group analysis, including the huddle promotes (1) a better-informed team, (2) relationship building, (3) communication process efficiencies, and (4) logistical challenges.

CONCLUSION

Sociograms can serve as a novel tool to characterize what actually happens during information exchange at the point of care and identify the nature of communication among team members. Daily huddles among team members involved in the frontline of patient care provides an opportunity to share information, requests, and questions and update shared mental models to meet team objectives.

摘要

目的

现代医学的复杂性要求高效的团队协作以确保高质量的护理。团队依赖可复制且高效的沟通模式。这项观察性研究的目的是描述跨专业团队成员在团队碰头会期间的沟通动态。该研究旨在:(a)通过评估在每次互动中谁与谁交谈以及发生了何种类型的沟通,来描述住院内科病房结构化碰头会中的沟通情况;(b)探究参与者对碰头会的看法。

材料与方法

我们使用社会关系图来直观呈现对小组互动结构和模式的直接观察结果。通过社会关系图,我们记录了团队成员信息交流、问题及请求的流动和频率。我们进行了两次后续焦点小组讨论,一次是与住院医师,另一次是与护士。

结果

观察到的最常见互动类型是信息交流:护士与住院医师之间(28.3%)以及住院医师与护士之间(47%)。住院医师和护士都提出了问题:护士向住院医师提问(7.4%)以及住院医师向护士提问(14.2%)。护士向住院医师提出的请求(2.8%)比住院医师向护士提出的请求(0.3%)更多。焦点小组分析得出了四个主题,包括碰头会促进了(1)信息更灵通的团队,(2)关系建立,(3)沟通流程效率,以及(4)后勤挑战。

结论

社会关系图可作为一种新颖的工具,用于描述在护理现场信息交流期间实际发生的情况,并识别团队成员之间沟通的性质。参与患者护理一线工作的团队成员每日进行碰头会,为分享信息、请求和问题以及更新共享心智模型以实现团队目标提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7683826/3bf3d15aac89/JMDH-13-1583-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7683826/679da3fb3468/JMDH-13-1583-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7683826/3bf3d15aac89/JMDH-13-1583-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7683826/679da3fb3468/JMDH-13-1583-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7683826/3bf3d15aac89/JMDH-13-1583-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a Sociogram to Characterize Communication During an Interprofessional Team Huddle.使用社会关系图来刻画跨专业团队碰头会期间的沟通情况。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 17;13:1583-1593. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S273746. eCollection 2020.
2
Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation-Guided Huddles Improve Communication and Teamwork in the Emergency Department.基于情况、背景、评估和建议的碰头会改善急诊科的沟通与团队协作
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Nov;41(6):484-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Effect of Increased Interprofessional Familiarity on Team Performance, Communication, and Psychological Safety on Inpatient Medical Teams: A Randomized Clinical Trial.增加跨专业熟悉程度对住院医疗团队的团队绩效、沟通和心理安全感的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Nov 1;182(11):1190-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4373.
4
Interprofessional Team Member Communication Patterns, Teamwork, and Collaboration in Pre-family Meeting Huddles in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.跨专业团队成员在儿科心脏重症监护病房预家庭会议中的沟通模式、团队合作和协作。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jul;58(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
5
Impact of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Preadmission Huddle on Perceptions of Interprofessional Communication About Patient Safety.儿科重症监护病房入院前小组讨论对患者安全相关的跨专业交流认知的影响。
Crit Care Nurse. 2022 Aug 1;42(4):55-67. doi: 10.4037/ccn2022307.
6
Using huddles to improve communication and teamwork in an instrument-processing department.利用交接班会议改善仪器处理部门的沟通和团队合作。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2020 Nov 25;27(6):34-42. doi: 10.7748/nm.2020.e1958. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
7
Gathering, strategizing, motivating and celebrating: the team huddle in a teaching general practice.
Educ Prim Care. 2018 Mar;29(2):94-99. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2018.1423642. Epub 2018 Jan 21.
8
Nurse/Resident Reciprocal Shadowing to Improve Interprofessional Communication.护士/住院医师相互影子学习以改善专业间沟通。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 May;11(5):435-445. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-002345. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Interprofessional collaboration between residents and nurses in general internal medicine: a qualitative study on behaviours enhancing teamwork quality.普通内科住院医师与护士之间的跨专业协作:一项关于提升团队合作质量行为的定性研究
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 25;9(4):e96160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096160. eCollection 2014.
10
Huddle up!: The adoption and use of structured team communication for VA medical home implementation.聚在一起!:在退伍军人事务部医疗之家实施过程中采用和使用结构化团队沟通。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Oct-Dec;40(4):286-99. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000036.

引用本文的文献

1
Bedside rounds in the hospital environment from the perspective of multiprofessional health teams.医院环境中的床边查房:多专业医疗团队的视角
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230493. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0493. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Situational Awareness: A Qualitative Study of Family Members' and Nurses' Perspectives on Teaching During Family-Centered Rounds.情境意识的重要性:一项关于家庭照护者和护士对以家庭为中心的查房教学看法的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1401-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000810.
2
Patient-centered interprofessional collaborative care: factors associated with bedside interprofessional rounds.以患者为中心的跨专业协作护理:与床边跨专业查房相关的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1040-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2817-x. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
3
Health care huddles: managing complexity to achieve high reliability.
医疗保健小组讨论:应对复杂性以实现高可靠性。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Jan-Mar;40(1):2-12. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000009.
4
Huddling for high reliability and situation awareness.为实现高可靠性和态势感知而聚在一起。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):899-906. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001467. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
5
There is no "i" in teamwork in the patient-centered medical home: defining teamwork competencies for academic practice.在以患者为中心的医疗之家,团队合作中没有“我”:为学术实践定义团队合作能力。
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):585-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b0289.
6
Assessment of teamwork during structured interdisciplinary rounds on medical units.医疗单元结构化跨学科查房期间的团队合作评估。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;7(9):679-83. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1970. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
7
Structured interdisciplinary rounds in a medical teaching unit: improving patient safety.医学教学单位中的结构化跨学科查房:提高患者安全
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 11;171(7):678-84. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.128.
8
Patterns of nurse-physician communication and agreement on the plan of care.护士与医生之间关于护理计划的沟通模式及一致性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Jun;19(3):195-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030221. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
9
Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.跨专业协作:基于实践的干预措施对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2.
10
On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments.关于团队、团队合作和团队绩效:发现与进展。
Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):540-7. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288457.