• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bedside rounds in the hospital environment from the perspective of multiprofessional health teams.医院环境中的床边查房:多专业医疗团队的视角
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230493. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0493. eCollection 2024.
2
All Together Now: Impact of a Regionalization and Bedside Rounding Initiative on the Efficiency and Inclusiveness of Clinical Rounds.现在齐心协力:区域化和床边查房倡议对临床查房效率和包容性的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):150-156. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2696.
3
A Qualitative Study of Patient and Interprofessional Healthcare Team Member Experiences of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds at a VA: Language, Teamwork, and Trust.一项关于退伍军人事务部(VA)床边跨学科查房中患者及跨专业医疗团队成员体验的定性研究:语言、团队合作与信任
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):538-546. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09124-8. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
4
"We're all truly pulling in the exact same direction": A qualitative study of attending and resident physician impressions of structured bedside interdisciplinary rounds.“我们都真正朝着同一个方向努力”:一项关于主治医生和住院医生对结构化床边跨学科查房的印象的定性研究。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Feb;19(2):92-100. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13272. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Patient-Centered Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds in the Medical ICU.医学重症监护病房中以患者为中心的结构化跨学科床边查房
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002807.
6
The Impact of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds on Length of Stay and Complications.床边多学科查房对住院时间和并发症的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):137-142. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2695.
7
Exploring Ward Team Handoffs of Overnight Admissions: Key Lessons from Field Observations.探索夜间入院的病房团队交接班:实地观察的重要经验教训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Apr;39(5):808-814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08549-x. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
8
Patient involvement in interdisciplinary bedside rounds from nursing and medical students' perceptions. A Swedish qualitative interview study.患者参与跨学科床边查房:护理和医学生的看法。一项瑞典定性访谈研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2024 Dec;38(4):1050-1060. doi: 10.1111/scs.13307. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
9
The art of bedside rounds: a multi-center qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers.床边查房的艺术:一项多中心定性研究,探讨经验丰富的床边教师所使用的策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
10
Impact of interdisciplinary rounds in the spinal cord injury unit on relational coordination for patients with pressure injury: A pilot study.脊髓损伤病房跨学科查房对压疮患者关系协调的影响:一项试点研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Mar;42(2):245-250. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1443418. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiprofessional round with checklist: association with the improvement in patient safety in intensive care.带有检查表的多专业查房:与重症监护中患者安全改善的关联
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2022 Nov 14;43(spe):e20210348. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2022.202100348.en. eCollection 2022.
2
Perception of physicians and nursing staff members regarding outside versus bedside ward rounds: ancillary analysis of the randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.医生和护理人员对床边与非床边查房的看法:随机对照 BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的辅助分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Jan 19;152:w30112. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30112. eCollection 2022 Jan 17.
3
The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.床边查房对医学教育学习成果的影响:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2022 Jun 1;97(6):923-930. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004586. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Disciplinary power on daily practices of nurses and physicians in the hospital.医院中针对护士和医生日常工作的学科权力。
Nurs Inq. 2022 Apr;29(2):e12455. doi: 10.1111/nin.12455. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
5
Relationships Between Time-at-Bedside During Hospital Ward Rounds, Clinician-Patient Agreement, and Patient Experience.医院查房时床边停留时间、医患一致性与患者体验之间的关系
J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 8;8:23743735211008303. doi: 10.1177/23743735211008303. eCollection 2021.
6
Using a Sociogram to Characterize Communication During an Interprofessional Team Huddle.使用社会关系图来刻画跨专业团队碰头会期间的沟通情况。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 17;13:1583-1593. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S273746. eCollection 2020.
7
Patient experience in co-production of care: perceptions about patient safety protocols.共同生产护理中的患者体验:对患者安全协议的看法。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3272. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3352.3272. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Configuration of power relations in physicians and nurses' professional practices.医生和护士专业实践中的权力关系配置。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73 Suppl 1:e20180629. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0629. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Good practices for effective communication: the experience of the interdisciplinary round in orthopedic surgery.有效沟通的良好实践:骨科跨学科查房的经验
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019;40(spe):e20180353. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180353. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

医院环境中的床边查房:多专业医疗团队的视角

Bedside rounds in the hospital environment from the perspective of multiprofessional health teams.

机构信息

Centro Universitário Newton Paiva. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230493. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0493. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0493
PMID:39607197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11653871/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the configuration of power relations among the multiprofessional team in the bedside round process in the hospital.

METHODS

Qualitative research with data analyzed through discourse analysis, based on Michel Foucault's theoretical framework. From September to December 2022, we conducted interviews and field observations with the multiprofessional team at a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, as well as qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 37 professionals.

RESULTS

The participants pointed out that the experiences of the professionals involved in bedside rounds depend on how the physician conducts the process, and the physician-centered process makes it difficult for other professionals in the team to participate.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

The way hospitals organize bedside rounds does not promote knowledge articulation for their professionals. It hinders the circulation of power and harms interdisciplinary work in a process that maintains the physician as the main actor in clinical decisions.

摘要

目的

分析医院床边查房过程中多专业团队之间的权力关系结构。

方法

这是一项基于米歇尔·福柯理论框架的定性研究,对数据进行话语分析。2022 年 9 月至 12 月,我们对巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州贝洛奥里藏特的一家医院的多专业团队进行了访谈和现场观察,并对 37 名专业人员进行了定性、半结构化访谈。

结果

参与者指出,参与床边查房的专业人员的经验取决于医生如何进行该过程,而以医生为中心的过程使得团队中的其他专业人员难以参与。

最终结论

医院组织床边查房的方式不利于专业人员之间的知识交流。它阻碍了权力的流通,破坏了跨学科工作,使医生在临床决策中仍然是主要角色。