Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜异位症中存在子宫内膜 DNA 损伤反应的调节。

Endometrial DNA damage response is modulated in endometriosis.

机构信息

Primate Biology Laboratory, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR-NIRRH), Mumbai, India.

Department of Pathology, Seth G.S. Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):160-174. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa255.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Is the DNA damage response (DDR) dysregulated in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Endometrial expression of genes involved in DDR is modulated in women with endometriosis, compared to those without the disease.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Ectopic endometriotic lesions are reported to harbour somatic mutations, thereby hinting at dysregulation of DDR and DNA repair pathways. However, it remains inconclusive whether the eutopic endometrium also manifests dysregulated DDR in endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: For this case-control study conducted between 2015 and 2019, eutopic endometrial (E) samples (EE- from women with endometriosis, CE- from women without endometriosis) were collected in either mid-proliferative (EE-MP, n = 23; CE-MP, n = 17) or mid-secretory (EE-MS, n = 17; CE-MS, n = 9) phases of the menstrual cycle. This study compares: (i) DNA damage marker localization, (ii) expression of DDR genes and (iii) expression of DNA repair genes in eutopic endometrial samples from women with and without endometriosis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included (i) 40 women (aged 31.9 ± 0.81 years) with endometriosis and (ii) 26 control women (aged 31.4 ± 1.02 years) without endometriosis. Eutopic endometrial samples from the two groups were divided into different parts for histological analysis, immunohistochemistry, RNA extraction, protein extraction and comet assays. Eighty-four genes of relevance in the DNA damage signalling pathway were evaluated for their expression in eutopic endometrial samples, using RT2 Profiler PCR arrays. Validations of the expression of two GADD (Growth Arrest DNA Damage Inducible) proteins - GADD45A and GADD45G were carried out by immunoblotting. DNA damage was assessed by immunohistochemical localization of γ-H2AFX (a phosphorylated variant of histone H2AX) and 8-OHdG (8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine). RNA sequencing data from mid-proliferative (EE-MP, n = 4; CE-MP, n = 3) and mid-secretory phase (EE-MS and CE-MS, n = 4 each) endometrial samples were scanned to compare the expression status of all the genes implicated in human DNA repair. PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen) expression was determined to assess endometrial proliferation. Residual DNA damage in primary endometrial cells was checked by comet assays. Public datasets were also scanned for the expression of DDR and DNA repair genes as our RNASeq data were limited by small sample size. All the comparisons were made between phase-matched endometrial samples from women with and without endometriosis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Endometrial expression of DDR genes and intensity of immunolocalized γ-H2AFX were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in EE, compared to CE samples. DDR proteins, especially those belonging to the GADD family, were found to be differentially abundant in EE, as compared to CE. These patterns were evident in both mid-proliferative and mid-secretory phases. Intriguingly, higher DDR was associated with increased cell proliferation in EE-MP, compared to CE-MP. Furthermore, among the differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) encoded by DNA repair genes, the majority showed up-regulation in EE-MP, compared to CE-MP. Interestingly, CE-MP and EE-MP had a comparable percentage (P > 0.05) of cells with residual DNA damage. However, unlike the mid-proliferative phase data, many DETs encoded by DNA repair genes were down-regulated in EE-MS, compared to CE-MS. An analysis of the phase-matched control and endometriosis samples included in the GSE51981 dataset available in the Gene Expression Omnibus database also revealed significant (P < 0.05) alterations in the expression of DDR and DNA repair genes in EE, compared to CE.

LARGE-SCALE DATA: N/A.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was conducted on a limited number of endometrial samples. Also, the study does not reveal the causes underlying dysregulated DDR in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Alterations in the expression of DDR and DNA repair genes indirectly suggest that eutopic endometrium, as compared to its healthy counterpart, encounters DNA damage-inducing stimuli, either of higher strength or for longer duration in endometriosis. It will be worthwhile to identify the nature of such stimuli and also explore the role of higher genomic insults and dysregulated DDR/DNA repair in the origin and/or progression of endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology and Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India. No conflict of interest is declared.

摘要

研究问题

子宫内膜异位症患者的在位子宫内膜中是否存在 DNA 损伤反应(DDR)失调?

总结答案

与无子宫内膜异位症的女性相比,子宫内膜异位症患者的 DDR 相关基因在子宫内膜中的表达受到调节。

已知事实

据报道,异位子宫内膜内存在体细胞突变,提示 DDR 和 DNA 修复途径失调。然而,尚不确定子宫内膜异位症患者的在位子宫内膜是否也存在 DDR 失调。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:本病例对照研究于 2015 年至 2019 年进行,收集了子宫内膜异位症患者(EE-)和无子宫内膜异位症患者(CE-)的在位子宫内膜(EE-MP,n=23;CE-MP,n=17;EE-MS,n=17;CE-MS,n=9)的中增殖期或中分泌期样本。本研究比较了:(i)DNA 损伤标志物定位,(ii)DDR 基因表达和(iii)DNA 修复基因表达。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:该研究包括 40 名(年龄 31.9±0.81 岁)子宫内膜异位症患者和 26 名(年龄 31.4±1.02 岁)无子宫内膜异位症的对照组女性。两组的在位子宫内膜样本分为不同部分进行组织学分析、免疫组织化学、RNA 提取、蛋白质提取和彗星分析。使用 RT2 Profiler PCR 阵列评估与 DNA 损伤信号通路相关的 84 个基因的表达。通过免疫印迹法验证了 GADD(生长停滞 DNA 损伤诱导)蛋白 GADD45A 和 GADD45G 的表达。通过免疫组织化学定位 γ-H2AFX(组蛋白 H2AX 的磷酸化变体)和 8-OHdG(8-羟基-2'-脱氧鸟苷)评估 DNA 损伤。对中增殖期(EE-MP,n=4;CE-MP,n=3)和中分泌期(EE-MS 和 CE-MS,n=4 个每个)子宫内膜样本进行 RNA 测序数据扫描,以比较所有涉及人类 DNA 修复的基因的表达状态。通过检测增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)表达来评估子宫内膜增殖。通过彗星分析检查原发性子宫内膜细胞中的残留 DNA 损伤。还扫描了公共数据集以检查 DDR 和 DNA 修复基因的表达,因为我们的 RNAseq 数据受到样本量小的限制。所有比较均在子宫内膜异位症和无子宫内膜异位症患者的相匹配的相位子宫内膜样本之间进行。

主要结果和机会的作用

与 CE 样本相比,EE 中的 DDR 基因表达和免疫组织化学定位的 γ-H2AFX 强度显著升高(P<0.05)。DDR 蛋白,特别是属于 GADD 家族的蛋白,在 EE 中与 CE 相比差异丰富。这些模式在中增殖期和中分泌期都很明显。有趣的是,与 CE-MP 相比,EE-MP 中 DDR 增加与细胞增殖增加相关。此外,在 DNA 修复基因编码的差异表达转录物(DETs)中,大多数在 EE-MP 中上调,而在 CE-MP 中下调。有趣的是,CE-MP 和 EE-MP 中具有残留 DNA 损伤的细胞百分比相当(P>0.05)。然而,与中增殖期数据不同,在 EE-MS 中,许多 DNA 修复基因编码的 DET 下调,而在 CE-MS 中上调。对基因表达综合数据库中包含的相匹配的对照和子宫内膜异位症样本的 GSE51981 数据集的分析也表明,与 CE 相比,在位子宫内膜中 DDR 和 DNA 修复基因的表达发生了显著变化(P<0.05)。

大规模数据

无。

局限性、谨慎的原因:该研究仅在有限数量的子宫内膜样本上进行。此外,该研究并未揭示子宫内膜异位症患者在位子宫内膜中 DDR 失调的根本原因。

研究结果的广泛意义

DDR 和 DNA 修复基因表达的改变间接表明,与健康对照组相比,在位子宫内膜在子宫内膜异位症中遇到了诱导 DNA 损伤的刺激,无论是强度更高还是持续时间更长。值得确定这种刺激的性质,并探索更高的基因组损伤和失调的 DDR/DNA 修复在子宫内膜异位症的起源和/或进展中的作用。

研究资助/利益冲突:该研究由印度生物技术部和印度医学研究理事会资助,政府资助。没有利益冲突的声明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验