Tuomisto J, Kasanen A, Renkonen O V
Chemotherapy. 1977;23(5):337-44. doi: 10.1159/000222003.
In a clinical double-blind study on 198 patients with a urinary tract infection, no differences were found between comparable groups treated with either sulfadiazine (SD) 1,000 MG/trimethoprim (TM) 320 mg or sulfamethoxazole (SM) 1,600 mg/trimethoprim 320 g daily for 2 weeks. The favorable results were obtained according to the bacteriological control in 85 and 79%, respectively. Also the incidence of side effects was the same (22 and 24%, resp.). The number of cases within which the treatment had to be discontinued did not differ percentually, either (6.6 and 8.4%, resp.). Based on the bacteriological sensitivity tests and the clinical trial, the authors conclude that TM can be combined with SD as well as with SM. Pharmacokinetic advantages, like a lower protein-binding and a lesser metabolism, may even make SD more preferable.
在一项针对198例尿路感染患者的临床双盲研究中,每天服用1000毫克磺胺嘧啶(SD)/320毫克甲氧苄啶(TM)或1600毫克磺胺甲恶唑(SM)/320毫克甲氧苄啶治疗2周的可比组之间未发现差异。根据细菌学对照,分别有85%和79%的患者获得了良好结果。副作用发生率也相同(分别为22%和24%)。必须停药的病例数在百分比上也没有差异(分别为6.6%和8.4%)。基于细菌学敏感性测试和临床试验,作者得出结论,TM可与SD以及SM联合使用。药代动力学优势,如较低的蛋白结合率和较少的代谢,甚至可能使SD更可取。