Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Department of Zoology, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Poult Sci. 2020 Dec;99(12):6946-6953. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.043. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
This experiment was carried out to evaluate the effects of dietary addition of probiotics (Protexin) and prebiotics (active MOS, mannan oligosaccharides) on growth performance, carcasses, and antibody titer in broilers. A total number of 360-day-old Ross broiler chicks were randomly divided into 9 groups in a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement. Nine broiler starter (0-21 d) and finisher (21-35 d) diets were formulated by using 3 levels of probiotics (0, 1, and 2 g/kg of feed) and 3 levels of MOS (0, 1, and 1.5 g/kg of feed) and were randomly allotted to 9 groups. Feed intake was not affected by interaction of treatments during all phases (P > 0.05). Feed intake was improved due to the main effect of probiotic (P = 0.0001) or MOS (P = 0.005). No interaction (P > 0.05) was observed for weight gain in the starter, finisher, and overall phases. While, during the starter and finisher phases, weight gain was increased by probiotics (P = 0.028 or 0.04, respectively). Dietary supplementation of MOS improved weight gain (P = 0.01) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P = 0.03) during the overall period, but during starter and finisher periods, weight gain and FCR were not affected by prebiotics. Apart from dressing percentage, no interaction or individual effect of probiotics and prebiotics was observed for carcass, breast, thigh, heart, liver, and gizzard weight. Antibody titer for infectious bursal disease (IBD) was improved (P = 0.026) by the interaction effect between probiotics and prebiotics, when compared with the control group. Antibody titer against Newcastle disease (ND) was not affected by probiotics or prebiotics or their interactions (P > 0.05). It could be concluded that supplementation of prebiotics or probiotics can improve the growth performance of broilers. It may also be helpful in improving the antibody titer against IBD in broilers fed antibiotic-free diets.
本试验旨在评估日粮添加益生菌(Protexin)和益生元(活性 MOS、甘露寡糖)对肉鸡生长性能、胴体和抗体效价的影响。将 360 日龄罗斯肉鸡雏鸡随机分为 9 组,采用 3 个水平的益生菌(0、1 和 2 g/kg 饲料)和 3 个水平的 MOS(0、1 和 1.5 g/kg 饲料)设计 3×3 因子试验。在所有阶段,处理间的采食量没有相互作用(P > 0.05)。由于益生菌(P = 0.0001)或 MOS(P = 0.005)的主效应,采食量得到改善。在育雏期、育肥期和全期均未观察到起始和结束阶段增重的相互作用(P > 0.05)。然而,在育雏期和育肥期,益生菌(P = 0.028 或 0.04)提高了增重。MOS 的日粮添加提高了整个试验期的增重(P = 0.01)和饲料转化率(FCR)(P = 0.03),但在育雏期和育肥期,益生元对增重和 FCR 没有影响。除了屠宰率外,益生菌和益生元的互作或单独效应对胴体、胸部、大腿、心脏、肝脏和肌胃重量没有影响。与对照组相比,益生菌和益生元的互作效应提高了传染性法氏囊病(IBD)的抗体效价(P = 0.026)。益生菌或益生元及其互作对新城疫(ND)抗体效价没有影响(P > 0.05)。综上所述,添加益生元或益生菌可以提高肉鸡的生长性能。它可能还有助于提高无抗生素日粮喂养的肉鸡的 IBD 抗体效价。