Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Mar;66:101232. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101232. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
Combining physical exercise with cognitive training is a popular intervention in dementia prevention trials and guidelines. However, it remains unclear what combination strategies are most beneficial for cognitive and physical outcomes. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the three main types of combination strategies (simultaneous, sequential or exergaming) to either intervention alone or control in older adults. Randomized controlled trials of combined cognitive and physical training were included in multivariate and network meta-analyses. In cognitively healthy older adults and mild cognitive impairment, the effect of any combined intervention relative to control was small and statistically significant for overall cognitive (k = 41, Hedges' g = 0.22, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.30) and physical function (k = 32, g = 0.25, 95 % CI 0.13 to 0.37). Simultaneous training was the most efficacious approach for cognition, followed by sequential combinations and cognitive training alone, and significantly better than physical exercise. For physical outcomes, simultaneous and sequential training showed comparable efficacy as exercise alone and significantly exceeded all other control conditions. Exergaming ranked low for both outcomes. Our findings suggest that simultaneously and sequentially combined interventions are efficacious for promoting cognitive alongside physical health in older adults, and therefore should be preferred over implementation of single-domain training.
将身体锻炼与认知训练相结合是预防痴呆症的临床试验和指南中的一种流行干预措施。然而,对于哪种组合策略对认知和身体结果最有益,仍不清楚。我们旨在比较三种主要的组合策略(同时、顺序或运动游戏)与单独干预或对照在老年人中的疗效。对认知健康的老年人和轻度认知障碍患者进行了结合认知和身体训练的随机对照试验,进行了多元和网络荟萃分析。与对照组相比,任何联合干预的效果都很小,但在总体认知(k = 41,Hedges' g = 0.22,95%CI 0.14 至 0.30)和身体功能(k = 32,g = 0.25,95%CI 0.13 至 0.37)方面具有统计学意义。同时训练对认知最有效,其次是顺序组合和单独认知训练,明显优于身体锻炼。对于身体结果,同时和顺序训练与单独运动锻炼具有可比的效果,明显优于所有其他对照条件。运动游戏在这两个结果中排名较低。我们的研究结果表明,同时和顺序结合的干预措施对促进老年人的认知和身体健康是有效的,因此应优先于单一领域训练的实施。