Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal, INIFAP, Querétaro, México.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Nov;68(6):3360-3365. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13939. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Mycobacterium bovis is the main cause of bovine tuberculosis (BTB) in cattle and can also infect humans. Zebu cattle are considered more resistant to some infectious diseases compared with Holstein-Friesian (HF) cattle, including BTB. However, epidemiological studies may not take into account usage differences of the two types of cattle. HF cattle may suffer greater metabolic stress due to their more or less exclusive dairy use, whereas Zebu cattle are mainly used for beef production. In experiments conducted so far, the number of animals has been too small to draw statistically robust conclusions on the resistance differences between these cattle breeds. Here, we used a BCG challenge model to compare the ability of naïve and vaccinated Zebu and HF cattle to control/kill mycobacteria. Young cattle of both breeds with similar ages were housed in the same accommodation for the duration of the experiment. After correcting for multiple comparisons, we found no difference between naïve HF and Zebu (ρ = 0.862) cattle. However, there was a trend for vaccinated HF cattle to have lower cfu numbers than non-vaccinated HF cattle (ρ = 0.057); no such trend was observed between vaccinated and non-vaccinated Zebu cattle (ρ = 0.560). Evaluation of antigen-specific IFNγ secretion by PBMC indicated that Zebu and HF cattle differed in their response to mycobacteria. Thus, whilst there may be difference in immune responses, our data indicate that with the number of animals included in the study and under the conditions used in this work, we were unable to measure any differences between Zebu and HF cattle in the overall control of mycobacteria. Whilst determination of different susceptibilities between Zebu and HF cattle using the BCG challenge model will require larger numbers of animals than the number of animals used in this experiment, these data should inform future experiments.
牛分枝杆菌是牛结核病(BTB)的主要病原体,也可感染人类。与荷斯坦-弗里生牛(HF)相比,瘤牛被认为对某些传染病具有更高的抗性,包括 BTB。然而,流行病学研究可能没有考虑到这两种牛的使用差异。由于 HF 牛或多或少地专门用于乳制品生产,因此它们可能会遭受更大的代谢应激,而瘤牛主要用于牛肉生产。到目前为止,在进行的实验中,由于动物数量太少,无法对这两种牛品种之间的抗性差异得出具有统计学意义的可靠结论。在这里,我们使用卡介苗(BCG)挑战模型比较了未经免疫和免疫的瘤牛和 HF 牛控制/杀死分枝杆菌的能力。具有相似年龄的两种牛的幼牛在实验期间被安置在相同的住所中。在进行多次比较校正后,我们发现未经免疫的 HF 牛和瘤牛之间没有差异(ρ=0.862)。然而,接种疫苗的 HF 牛的 CFU 数量低于未接种疫苗的 HF 牛(ρ=0.057),而在接种疫苗的瘤牛和未接种疫苗的瘤牛之间没有观察到这种趋势(ρ=0.560)。评估 PBMC 中抗原特异性 IFNγ的分泌表明,瘤牛和 HF 牛对分枝杆菌的反应不同。因此,尽管免疫反应可能存在差异,但我们的数据表明,在研究中包含的动物数量和本工作中使用的条件下,我们无法测量出瘤牛和 HF 牛在控制分枝杆菌方面的总体差异。使用 BCG 挑战模型确定瘤牛和 HF 牛之间的不同敏感性需要比本实验中使用的动物数量更多的动物,但这些数据应该为未来的实验提供信息。