Pelot Nicole A, Goldhagen Gabriel B, Cariello Jake E, Musselman Eric D, Clissold Kara A, Ezzell J Ashley, Grill Warren M
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Histology Research Core, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2020 Nov 4;14:601479. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.601479. eCollection 2020.
It is necessary to understand the morphology of the vagus nerve (VN) to design and deliver effective and selective vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) because nerve morphology influences fiber responses to electrical stimulation. Specifically, nerve diameter (and thus, electrode-fiber distance), fascicle diameter, fascicular organization, and perineurium thickness all significantly affect the responses of nerve fibers to electrical signals delivered through a cuff electrode. We quantified the morphology of cervical and subdiaphragmatic VNs in humans, pigs, and rats: effective nerve diameter, number of fascicles, effective fascicle diameters, proportions of endoneurial, perineurial, and epineurial tissues, and perineurium thickness. The human and pig VNs were comparable sizes (∼2 mm cervically; ∼1.6 mm subdiaphragmatically), while the rat nerves were ten times smaller. The pig nerves had ten times more fascicles-and the fascicles were smaller-than in human nerves (47 vs. 7 fascicles cervically; 38 vs. 5 fascicles subdiaphragmatically). Comparing the cervical to the subdiaphragmatic VNs, the nerves and fascicles were larger at the cervical level for all species and there were more fascicles for pigs. Human morphology generally exhibited greater variability across samples than pigs and rats. A prior study of human somatic nerves indicated that the ratio of perineurium thickness to fascicle diameter was approximately constant across fascicle diameters. However, our data found thicker human and pig VN perineurium than those prior data: the VNs had thicker perineurium for larger fascicles and thicker perineurium normalized by fascicle diameter for smaller fascicles. Understanding these differences in VN morphology between preclinical models and the clinical target, as well as the variability across individuals of a species, is essential for designing suitable cuff electrodes and stimulation parameters and for informing translation of preclinical results to clinical application to advance the therapeutic efficacy of VNS.
由于神经形态会影响纤维对电刺激的反应,因此了解迷走神经(VN)的形态对于设计和实施有效的选择性迷走神经刺激(VNS)至关重要。具体而言,神经直径(进而电极与纤维的距离)、束直径、束状组织以及神经束膜厚度均会显著影响神经纤维对通过袖带电极传递的电信号的反应。我们对人类、猪和大鼠的颈段和膈下迷走神经的形态进行了量化:有效神经直径、束数、有效束直径、神经内膜、神经束膜和神经外膜组织的比例以及神经束膜厚度。人类和猪的迷走神经大小相当(颈段约2毫米;膈下段约1.6毫米),而大鼠的神经则小十倍。猪的神经束比人类神经多十倍,且束更小(颈段分别为47束和7束;膈下段分别为38束和5束)。比较颈段和膈下迷走神经,所有物种的神经和神经束在颈段水平更大,猪的神经束更多。与猪和大鼠相比,人类形态在样本间通常表现出更大的变异性。先前一项关于人类体神经的研究表明,神经束膜厚度与束直径的比值在不同束直径之间大致恒定。然而,我们的数据发现人类和猪的迷走神经束膜比先前的数据更厚:对于较大的神经束,迷走神经的神经束膜更厚,对于较小的神经束,按束直径归一化后的神经束膜更厚。了解临床前模型与临床靶点之间迷走神经形态的这些差异,以及同一物种个体间的变异性,对于设计合适的袖带电极和刺激参数,以及将临床前结果转化为临床应用以提高VNS的治疗效果至关重要。