Psychiatric Research Unit, Center for Personality Disorder Research, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Slagelse.
Department of Personality Disorders and Trauma, Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;34(1):54-63. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000658.
The International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11) classifies personality disturbance according to levels of severity. This article reviews the literature on levels of personality functioning in relation to clinical management and treatment, and proposes how these findings apply to the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders.
Findings were primarily derived from studies using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), Kernberg's Level of Personality Organization, and the general P-factor of personality disorder. Severity of personality dysfunction is related to treatment outcome, risk of dropout, therapeutic alliance, readiness for treatment, risk of harm to self or others, risk of dissociation and psychotic-like breaks, coherence in narrative identity, reflective functioning, and epistemic trust.
The overall level of personality disorder severity indicates risk of negative outcomes and may be used as decision tool for 'personalized medicine' and required treatment intensity (e.g., strength of alliance and the need for establishing epistemic trust). Beyond the ICD-11 guidelines for determining personality disorder severity, these implications also apply to practitioners using comparable frameworks such as the DSM-5 LPFS and Kernberg's Level of Personality Organization. Future research should focus on the interaction of severity with trait qualifiers in relation to clinical management.
第 11 版《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)根据严重程度对人格障碍进行分类。本文综述了人格功能水平与临床管理和治疗相关的文献,并提出了这些发现如何适用于 ICD-11 人格障碍分类。
研究结果主要来自使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 5 版(DSM-5)人格功能水平量表(LPFS)、Kernberg 的人格组织水平以及人格障碍的一般 P 因素的研究。人格功能障碍的严重程度与治疗结果、脱落风险、治疗联盟、治疗准备、自我或他人伤害风险、解离和类精神病发作风险、叙事认同的连贯性、反思功能和认识信任有关。
总体人格障碍严重程度表明存在负面结果的风险,可作为“个性化医疗”和所需治疗强度的决策工具(例如,联盟的强度和建立认识信任的必要性)。除了 ICD-11 确定人格障碍严重程度的指南外,这些含义也适用于使用 DSM-5 LPFS 和 Kernberg 人格组织水平等类似框架的从业者。未来的研究应集中在严重程度与特质修饰语的相互作用上,以了解其与临床管理的关系。