Moore Stephanie A, Sridhar Aksheya, Taormina Isabella, Rajadhyaksha Manasi, Azad Gazi
School of Education, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Psychology Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Implement Res Pract. 2024 Jan 8;5:26334895231220279. doi: 10.1177/26334895231220279. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
School leaders play an integral role in the use of implementation strategies, which in turn support special education teachers in the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). In this convergent mixed methods study, we explored school leaders' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation, particularly for students receiving special education, as well as the importance and feasibility of 15 implementation strategies.
School leaders ( = 22, principals, assistant principals, school psychologists, etc.) participated in a semistructured interview that included three parts-qualitative questions, quantitative ratings of strategies' importance and feasibility, and discussion of the top three implementation strategies. Data strands were analyzed independently and then integrated to generate meta-inferences.
The qualitative data identified facilitators such as access to resources about the intervention (e.g., professional development) and collaboration and teamwork, while barriers centered on lack of school supports, culture/climate, and organizational factors (e.g., lack of communication). The quantitative data indicated that the implementation strategy was rated as important and feasible. was rated as important but less feasible, while and were rated as feasible, but less important. was rated as less important and feasible. There was convergence and divergence in mixed methods findings.
This study underscores the critical need to increase school leaders' knowledge and skills related to implementation science to better leverage implementation strategies that address the confluence of relevant implementation determinants.
学校领导在实施策略的运用中发挥着不可或缺的作用,而这些策略反过来又能支持特殊教育教师实施循证实践(EBPs)。在这项聚合性混合方法研究中,我们探讨了学校领导对循证实践实施的促进因素和障碍的看法,特别是对于接受特殊教育的学生,以及15种实施策略的重要性和可行性。
学校领导(n = 22,包括校长、副校长、学校心理学家等)参与了一次半结构化访谈,访谈包括三个部分——定性问题、对策略重要性和可行性的定量评分,以及对排名前三的实施策略的讨论。对各数据组进行独立分析,然后整合以生成元推论。
定性数据确定了促进因素,如获得有关干预措施的资源(如专业发展)以及协作和团队合作,而障碍集中在缺乏学校支持、文化/氛围和组织因素(如缺乏沟通)。定量数据表明,实施策略[具体策略名称1]被评为重要且可行。[具体策略名称2]被评为重要但可行性较低,而[具体策略名称3]和[具体策略名称4]被评为可行但重要性较低。[具体策略名称5]被评为重要性和可行性均较低。混合方法研究结果存在趋同和分歧。
本研究强调迫切需要提高学校领导与实施科学相关的知识和技能,以便更好地利用实施策略来应对相关实施决定因素的融合。