Nieman Christine C, Schaefer Daniel M, Maroney Michael, Nelson Kathryn, Albrecht Kenneth A
USDA-ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, AR-23, Booneville, AR 72927, USA.
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 24;7(4):186. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7040186.
Clinical signs of photosensitivity in cattle can occur sporadically and unpredictably. It is believed that cases of photosensitivity may be underreported, causing inaccurate and inflated reports of mortality. Additionally, because secondary photosensitization in grazing cattle occurs with liver damage or dysfunction, photosensitivity can have many potential or associated causes. This case links a previous occurrence of coccidiosis to an outbreak of photosensitivity in grazing Holstein steers. Grazing management staff first observed clinical signs of photosensitivity 17 days after an outbreak of coccidiosis and subsequent turnout to spring pastures. Clinical signs were observed in 25% of the population. The severity of photosensitivity was variable and ranged from blistered skin on the muzzle to sloughing of unpigmented epidermis and thinly haired regions. Severely affected cattle were removed from pasture, housed under shade, monitored for infection, and recovered without treatment. Mild cases remained on pasture and recovered without treatment. Photosensitivity did not reoccur in the cattle that remained on pasture or in mildly affected cattle returned to pasture. Photosensitivity did not appear to be associated with pasture weeds, a specific forage species, or variable or extreme weather conditions that could have resulted in mycotoxin production. The occurrence appears to have been a result of a previous and concurrent coccidiosis outbreak that caused secondary photosensitization through hepatic lipidosis caused by anorexia and dehydration associated with the severe coccidiosis. Although clinical signs appeared suddenly, cattle recovered quickly and without treatment.
牛的光敏性皮炎临床症状可能偶尔且不可预测地出现。据信光敏性皮炎病例可能报告不足,导致死亡率报告不准确且虚高。此外,由于放牧牛的继发性光敏性皮炎与肝脏损伤或功能障碍有关,光敏性皮炎可能有许多潜在或相关原因。本病例将先前发生的球虫病与放牧的荷斯坦阉牛群中爆发的光敏性皮炎联系起来。放牧管理人员在球虫病爆发并随后转向春季牧场17天后首次观察到光敏性皮炎的临床症状。25%的牛出现了临床症状。光敏性皮炎的严重程度各不相同,从口鼻部皮肤起泡到无色素表皮和毛发稀疏区域的脱落。病情严重的牛被从牧场转移,安置在阴凉处,监测感染情况,未经治疗即康复。轻症病例留在牧场,未经治疗即康复。留在牧场的牛或返回牧场的轻症牛未再次出现光敏性皮炎。光敏性皮炎似乎与牧场杂草、特定饲料品种或可能导致霉菌毒素产生的多变或极端天气条件无关。此次发病似乎是先前同时发生的球虫病爆发的结果,该球虫病通过与严重球虫病相关的厌食和脱水导致的肝脂肪变性引起继发性光敏性皮炎。尽管临床症状突然出现,但牛恢复迅速且未经治疗。