Kalasauskas Darius, Keric Naureen, Abu Ajaj Salman, von Cube Leoni, Ringel Florian, Renovanz Mirjam
Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 25;12(12):3503. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123503.
The diagnosis of intracranial meningiomas as incidental findings is increasing by growing availability of MRI diagnostics. However, the psychological distress of patients with incidental meningiomas under a wait-and-watch strategy is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to compare the psychosocial situation of meningioma patients under wait-and-watch to patients after complete resection to bridge this gap. The inclusion criteria for the prospective monocenter study were either an incidental meningioma under a wait-and-watch strategy or no neurologic deficits after complete resection. Sociodemographic, clinical, and health-related quality of life and clinical data were assessed. Psychosocial factors were measured by the Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and the Short Form (SF-36). A total of 62 patients were included (n = 51 female, mean age 61 (SD 13) years). According to HADS, the prevalence of anxiety was 45% in the postoperative and 42% in the wait-and-watch group ( = 0.60), and depression was 61% and 87%, respectively ( = 0.005). In total, 43% of patients under wait-and-watch and 37% of patients in the postoperative group scored ≥6 on the DT scale. SF-36 scores were similar in all categories except general health ( = 0.005) and physical component aggregate score (43.7 (13.6) vs. 50.5 (9.5), ( = 0.03), both lower in the wait-and-watch group. Multivariate analysis revealed the wait-and-watch strategy was associated with a 4.26-fold higher risk of a pathological depression score based on HADS ( = 0.03). This study demonstrates a high prevalence of psychological distress in meningioma patients. Further evaluation is necessary to identify the patients in need of psychooncological support.
随着MRI诊断技术的日益普及,颅内脑膜瘤作为偶然发现的诊断数量不断增加。然而,采用观察等待策略的偶然脑膜瘤患者的心理困扰情况尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在比较观察等待的脑膜瘤患者与完全切除术后患者的心理社会状况,以填补这一空白。这项前瞻性单中心研究的纳入标准为采用观察等待策略的偶然脑膜瘤患者或完全切除术后无神经功能缺损的患者。评估了社会人口统计学、临床、与健康相关的生活质量和临床数据。通过痛苦温度计(DT)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、简明疲劳量表(BFI)和简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)测量心理社会因素。共纳入62例患者(n = 51例女性,平均年龄61(标准差13)岁)。根据HADS,焦虑症患病率在术后组为45%,观察等待组为42%(P = 0.60),抑郁症患病率分别为61%和87%(P = 0.005)。总体而言,观察等待组43%的患者和术后组37%的患者DT量表得分≥6分。除总体健康(P = 0.005)和身体成分综合得分(43.7(13.6)对50.5(9.5),P = 0.03,观察等待组均较低)外,SF-36各类别得分相似。多因素分析显示,基于HADS,观察等待策略与病理性抑郁评分风险高4.26倍相关(P = 0.03)。本研究表明脑膜瘤患者心理困扰的患病率很高。有必要进行进一步评估,以确定需要心理肿瘤学支持的患者。