• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于信息通信技术的移动出行服务的使用与德黑兰和开罗自行车出行方式选择之间的关联。

The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo.

机构信息

Mobility Research Cluster, Department of Work, Technology and Participation, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.

Center for Technology and Society, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 25;17(23):8767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238767.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17238767
PMID:33255778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7728358/
Abstract

Regarding the sharp growth rate of ICT (information and communication technology) - based mobility services like ridesourcing, it is essential to investigate the impact of these new mobility services on the transport mode choices, particularly on active mobility modes like cycling. This impact is more important in the MENA context (the Middle East and North Africa), where cycling does not constitute the main mobility mode in the modal split of most MENA cities. This paper studies the relationship between the regular use of ICT-based mobility services like ridesourcing and the tendency to cycle to near destinations. This paper contains the analysis of 4431 interviews in two large cities of the MENA region (Cairo and Tehran). This research uses logistic regression to analyze and compare the odds of cycling among regular and non-regular users of ridesourcing by considering the socio-economic, land use, and perception variables. The findings indicate that the odds of cycling among the regular users of ridesourcing are 2.30 and 1.94 times greater than these odds among non-regular ridesourcing users in Tehran and Cairo, respectively. Therefore, the regular users of ridesourcing are more likely to cycle to their near destinations than non-regular ridesourcing users in these cities.

摘要

关于信息和通信技术(ICT)为基础的出行服务(如网约车)的快速增长,有必要研究这些新的出行服务对交通方式选择的影响,特别是对自行车等主动出行方式的影响。在中东和北非(MENA)地区,这种影响更为重要,因为在大多数 MENA 城市的交通方式分担中,自行车并不是主要的出行方式。本文研究了基于 ICT 的出行服务(如网约车)的常规使用与骑行前往近距目的地的倾向之间的关系。本文包含了对 MENA 地区两个大城市(开罗和德黑兰)的 4431 次访谈的分析。本研究使用逻辑回归分析和比较了定期使用网约车和非定期使用网约车的用户骑行的可能性,考虑了社会经济、土地利用和感知变量。研究结果表明,在德黑兰和开罗,定期使用网约车的用户骑行的可能性分别是非定期使用网约车用户的 2.30 倍和 1.94 倍。因此,与非定期使用网约车的用户相比,这些城市的网约车定期用户更有可能骑行前往近距目的地。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/1cc6c85e8930/ijerph-17-08767-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/cb3a4d4ff1ac/ijerph-17-08767-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/84acf42bdbf2/ijerph-17-08767-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/15859e5b895f/ijerph-17-08767-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/1cc6c85e8930/ijerph-17-08767-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/cb3a4d4ff1ac/ijerph-17-08767-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/84acf42bdbf2/ijerph-17-08767-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/15859e5b895f/ijerph-17-08767-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/7728358/1cc6c85e8930/ijerph-17-08767-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo.基于信息通信技术的移动出行服务的使用与德黑兰和开罗自行车出行方式选择之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 25;17(23):8767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238767.
2
Innovative health care mobility services in the US.美国创新的医疗保健移动服务。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08803-5.
3
Exploring the attitudes of Millennials and Generation Xers toward ridesourcing services.探究千禧一代和X一代对拼车服务的态度。
Transportation (Amst). 2022;49(6):1765-1799. doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10227-y. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
4
Who is in the near market for bicycle sharing? Identifying current, potential, and unlikely users of a public bicycle share program in Vancouver, Canada.谁是共享单车的潜在市场?识别加拿大温哥华公共自行车共享计划的当前、潜在和不太可能的用户。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6246-3.
5
Has ridesourcing reduced haze? An analysis using the Didi app.网约车减少了雾霾吗?基于滴滴出行 APP 的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(33):45571-45585. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13934-2. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
6
Residential relocation trajectories and neighborhood density, mixed land use and access networks as predictors of walking and bicycling in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966.居住迁移轨迹和邻里密度、混合土地利用和可达性网络对芬兰北部出生队列 1966 年步行和骑自行车的预测。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Oct 21;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0856-8.
7
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ridesourcing services differed between small towns and large cities.**新冠疫情对网约车服务的影响在小城镇和大城市之间存在差异。**
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0275714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275714. eCollection 2022.
8
The Profile of Bicycle Users, Their Perceived Difficulty to Cycle, and the Most Frequent Trip Origins and Destinations in Aracaju, Brazil.巴西阿拉卡茹市自行车使用者特征、骑车出行难度感知,以及最常出行的出发地和目的地。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;17(21):7983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217983.
9
Key influences on motivations for utility cycling (cycling for transport to and from places).影响实用骑行动机(即骑车往返于各地点的出行目的)的主要因素。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):227-33. doi: 10.1071/HE13062.
10
Evaluating the impact of implementing public bicycle share programs on cycling: the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS).评估公共自行车共享计划实施对骑行的影响:国际自行车共享对骑行和碰撞影响研究(IBICCS)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 20;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0871-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting Active Mobility and Green Jobs through the Promotion of Cycling.通过推广自行车出行来支持积极的出行方式和绿色就业。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 19;14(12):1603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121603.
2
Perceived Neighborhood Environmental Attributes Associated with Walking and Cycling for Transport among Adult Residents of 17 Cities in 12 Countries: The IPEN Study.12个国家17个城市成年居民中与步行和骑行出行相关的邻里环境感知属性:国际人体暴露和环境污染物队列(IPEN)研究
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Mar;124(3):290-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409466. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review.
主动出行的健康影响评估:一项系统综述。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
4
Adult active transport in the Netherlands: an analysis of its contribution to physical activity requirements.荷兰成年人的主动运输:对其对身体活动需求贡献的分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0121871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121871. eCollection 2015.
5
The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge.影响在一个对自行车友好城市中汽车使用的因素:以剑桥为例。
J Transp Geogr. 2013 Apr;28(100):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.10.013.
6
Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study.伦敦自行车共享系统的健康影响:健康影响建模研究。
BMJ. 2014 Feb 13;348:g425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g425.
7
The societal costs and benefits of commuter bicycling: simulating the effects of specific policies using system dynamics modeling.通勤骑自行车的社会成本与效益:运用系统动力学模型模拟特定政策的影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Apr;122(4):335-44. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307250. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
8
Effect of increasing active travel in urban England and Wales on costs to the National Health Service.英格兰和威尔士增加积极出行对国民保健制度成本的影响。
Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2198-205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60766-1.
9
Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: bicycling versus driving.建筑环境对健康交通选择的影响:骑自行车与开车。
J Urban Health. 2010 Dec;87(6):969-93. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6.
10
Built environment correlates of walking: a review.步行与建成环境的相关性:综述
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S550-66. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4.