• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Epistemonikos：用于健康决策的系统评价综合数据库。

Epistemonikos: a comprehensive database of systematic reviews for health decision-making.

机构信息

Centro Evidencia UC, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Epistemonikos Foundation, Avenida Holanda 895, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01157-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-020-01157-x
PMID:33256642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7708132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews allow health decisions to be informed by the best available research evidence. However, their number is proliferating quickly, and many skills are required to identify all the relevant reviews for a specific question.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We screen 10 bibliographic databases on a daily or weekly basis, to identify systematic reviews relevant for health decision-making. Using a machine-based approach developed for this project we select reviews, which are then validated by a network of more than 1000 collaborators. After screening over 1,400,000 records we have identified more than 300,000 systematic reviews, which are now stored in a single place and accessible through an easy-to-use search engine. This makes Epistemonikos the largest database of its kind.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a systematic approach, recruiting a broad network of collaborators and implementing automated methods, we developed a one-stop shop for systematic reviews relevant for health decision making.

摘要

背景

系统评价使健康决策能够依据最佳现有研究证据做出。然而，它们的数量迅速增加，并且需要许多技能来确定特定问题的所有相关综述。

方法和发现

我们每天或每周筛选 10 个书目数据库，以确定与健康决策相关的系统评价。我们使用为此项目开发的基于机器的方法来选择综述，然后由一个由 1000 多名合作者组成的网络进行验证。在筛选了超过 140 万条记录后，我们已经确定了超过 30 万篇系统评价，这些评价现在存储在一个地方，并可通过一个易于使用的搜索引擎访问。这使 Epistemonikos 成为同类中最大的数据库。

结论

我们采用系统的方法，招募广泛的合作者网络，并实施自动化方法，为与健康决策相关的系统评价开发了一站式服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/7708132/6d37faf83353/12874_2020_1157_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/7708132/eb32d254a7d8/12874_2020_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/7708132/6d37faf83353/12874_2020_1157_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/7708132/eb32d254a7d8/12874_2020_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/7708132/6d37faf83353/12874_2020_1157_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Epistemonikos: a comprehensive database of systematic reviews for health decision-making.Epistemonikos：用于健康决策的系统评价综合数据库。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01157-x.
2
A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.七个关键文献数据库在识别所有关于高血压干预措施的相关系统评价方面的性能比较。
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5.
3
Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study.数据库组合检索系统评价综述中的系统评价：一项方法学研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00983-3.
4
Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases.检索定性健康研究需要使用多个数据库和替代搜索策略：对书目数据库收录情况的研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Epistemonikos: a free, relational, collaborative, multilingual database of health evidence.Epistemonikos：一个免费的、关系型的、协作式的、多语言健康证据数据库。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:486-90.
6
[Systematic literature search in PubMed : A short introduction].[在PubMed中进行系统文献检索：简短介绍]
Anaesthesist. 2018 Dec;67(12):955-972. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0504-8.
7
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.开发和验证一种用于识别以公平为重点的研究的搜索筛选器：减少需要筛选的数量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x.
8
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.肥胖预防政策研究的信息来源：系统评价综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 8;6(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0543-2.
9
Discriminating between empirical studies and nonempirical works using automated text classification.使用自动化文本分类区分实证研究和非实证作品。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Dec;9(4):587-601. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1317. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Developing and refining the methods for a 'one-stop shop' for research evidence about health systems.开发并完善获取卫生系统研究证据的“一站式服务”方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Feb 25;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Social Media to Disseminate Behavior Change Interventions: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews.利用社交媒体传播行为改变干预措施：系统评价的范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e57370. doi: 10.2196/57370.
2
The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间实施的公共卫生和社会措施的效果：系统评价概述
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Apr 29;2(5):e12055. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12055. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Incentives in prescribing, dispensing and pharmaceutical spending: A scientometric mapping.

本文引用的文献

1
When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist.何时复制干预措施的系统评价：共识清单
BMJ. 2020 Sep 15;370:m2864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2864.
2
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南：干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
3
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis.元分析与研究综合的科学。
处方、配药及药品支出方面的激励措施：一项科学计量映射研究。
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 11;13:1333. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.156306.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and validation of a search strategy and an automated classifier for retrieving temporomandibular disorders studies.用于检索颞下颌关节紊乱症研究的检索策略和自动分类器的开发与验证
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2024 Jun;38(2):74-81. doi: 10.22514/jofph.2024.015. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
The optimal approach for retrieving systematic reviews was achieved when searching MEDLINE and Epistemonikos in addition to reference checking: a methodological validation study.在进行文献检索时，同时搜索 MEDLINE 和 Epistemonikos 并辅以参考文献检查，可实现系统评价检索的最优化：一项方法学验证研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02384-2.
6
An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses Evaluating Associations between Human Health and Exposure to Major Classes of Plastic-Associated Chemicals.伞式综述评估了人类健康与接触主要类别的塑料相关化学品之间的关联。
Ann Glob Health. 2024 Aug 19;90(1):52. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4459. eCollection 2024.
7
Development of a core data set for describing, measuring and reporting the learning curve in studies of novel invasive procedures: study protocol.描述、测量和报告新型有创性操作研究中学习曲线的核心数据集制定：研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 25;14(7):e084252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084252.
8
Evidence-informed guidelines in oral health: insights from a systematic survey.循证口腔健康指南：系统调查的见解。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04445-w.
9
Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies: a living systematic review (protocol).嵌合抗原受体T细胞（CAR-T）疗法治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的疗效与安全性：一项实时系统评价（方案）
Open Res Eur. 2024 May 21;2:38. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14390.2. eCollection 2022.
10
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where's the evidence?知情选择的关键概念：证据在哪里？
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 27;11:890. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123051.1. eCollection 2022.
Nature. 2018 Mar 7;555(7695):175-182. doi: 10.1038/nature25753.
4
Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?系统评价和荟萃分析的大规模生产：一场超级愚蠢的行为？
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):515-9. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12211.
5
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.冗余、误导性及存在冲突的系统评价和Meta分析的大量产出。
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):485-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
6
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.生物医学研究系统评价的流行病学及报告特征：一项横断面研究
PLoS Med. 2016 May 24;13(5):e1002028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028. eCollection 2016 May.
7
A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.七个关键文献数据库在识别所有关于高血压干预措施的相关系统评价方面的性能比较。
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5.
8
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.生物医学文献中的可重复研究实践与透明度
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 4;14(1):e1002333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333. eCollection 2016 Jan.
9
What is the future of biomedical research?生物医学研究的未来是什么？
Med Hypotheses. 2015 Oct;85(4):488-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap.实时系统评价：缩小证据-实践差距的新契机。
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 18;11(2):e1001603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. eCollection 2014 Feb.