Suppr超能文献

不同的数字显示屏如何影响眼表面?

How Do Different Digital Displays Affect the Ocular Surface?

机构信息

Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Dec;97(12):1070-1079. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001616.

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE

Digital display use has been accepted as a contributing factor to dry eye disease. Nowadays, plenty of new models of digital displays have been developed, and the differences in their nature and the ways in which they are set and used may contribute to differences in the eye-related problems they cause.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the differences in ocular surface, tear film, and visual fatigue parameters after reading on different digital displays, with and without initial instillation of artificial tears.

METHODS

Thirty-one healthy individuals ranging in age from 20 to 26 years (mean ± standard deviation, 21.26 ± 1.73 years) were included in this prospective clinical study. Subjects' ocular surface, tear film, and visual fatigue parameters were assessed after reading for 15 minutes on a laptop computer, tablet, e-reader, and smartphone with matching characteristics and a baseline measurement. Measurements were taken with and without the instillation of artificial tears before the reading tasks and included the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire, tear meniscus height, the Schirmer I test, noninvasive keratograph break-up time, osmolarity, bulbar redness, and pupil size.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in the Ocular Surface Disease Index, Computer Vision the Syndrome Questionnaire, tear meniscus height, the Schirmer I test, noninvasive keratograph break-up time, osmolarity, and bulbar redness were obtained when comparing the displays (P < .05). Best results were obtained with the smartphone and the e-reader. Conversely, the computer produced the highest disturbance on the ocular surface and tear film. Finally, the instillation of artificial tears revealed no statistical improvement of ocular surface or tear film parameters for the same device (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into account the clinical tests for dry eye diagnosis, the smartphone may be considered as the least disturbing display, producing lower dry eye signs and symptoms in comparison with other devices.

摘要

意义

数字显示的使用已被认为是干眼症的一个致病因素。如今,已经开发出了大量新型数字显示设备,它们的性质以及设置和使用方式的差异可能导致它们引起的眼部问题的差异。

目的

本研究旨在分析在阅读不同的数字显示设备(包括使用和不使用人工泪液滴眼)前后,眼表、泪膜和视觉疲劳参数的差异。

方法

本前瞻性临床研究纳入了 31 名年龄在 20 至 26 岁之间(平均±标准差,21.26±1.73 岁)的健康个体。在阅读笔记本电脑、平板电脑、电子阅读器和智能手机 15 分钟后,对受试者的眼表、泪膜和视觉疲劳参数进行评估,这些设备具有匹配的特征和基线测量值。在阅读任务之前,还进行了有无人工泪液滴眼的测量,包括眼表疾病指数问卷、计算机视觉综合征问卷、泪膜弯月高、泪液分泌试验、非侵入性角膜破裂时间、渗透压、球结膜充血和瞳孔大小。

结果

在比较不同显示设备时,眼表疾病指数、计算机视觉综合征问卷、泪膜弯月高、泪液分泌试验、非侵入性角膜破裂时间、渗透压和球结膜充血等参数存在统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。智能手机和电子阅读器的效果最佳。相反,计算机对眼表和泪膜的干扰最大。最后,对于相同的设备,人工泪液滴眼并没有显著改善眼表或泪膜参数(P>0.05)。

结论

考虑到干眼病的临床诊断测试,智能手机可能被认为是干扰最小的显示设备,与其他设备相比,产生的干眼迹象和症状更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验