School of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 Feb 1;64(2):14. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.2.14.
To compare blinking measured in situ during various tasks and examine relationships with ocular surface symptoms. The day-to-day repeatability of the blink rate and interblink interval was assessed.
Twenty-four students (28.6 ± 6.3 years; 8 male and 16 female) completed six reading tasks (printed text, laptop, TV, smartphone, smartphone at 50% brightness, smartphone with complex text), and two nonreading tasks (conversation, walking) in a randomized cross-over study. Ocular surface symptoms and clinical signs were assessed. The blink rate and interblink interval were measured using a wearable eye tracking headset. Blink parameters were compared across tasks and time (linear mixed model and post hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction). Associations between blinking, symptoms, ocular surface, and clinical signs were assessed (Spearman's correlation). The smartphone reading task was completed twice to determine the coefficient of repeatability.
The blink rate was lower (mean 10.7 ± 9.7 blinks/min) and the interblink interval longer (mean 9.6 ± 8.7 seconds) during all reading tasks compared with conversation (mean 32.4 ± 12.4 blinks/min; 1.5 ± 0.6 seconds) and walking (mean 31.3 ± 15.5 blinks/min; 1.9 ± 1.3s) (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in blink parameters between any of the reading tasks or between conversation and walking. Changes in blinking occurred within 1 minute of starting the task. No associations were evident between blink rate or interblink interval and ocular surface symptoms or signs. The coefficient of repeatability was ±12.4 blinks/min for blink rate and ±18.8 seconds for interblink interval.
Spontaneous blinking can be measured reliably in situ. The blink rate was decreased and the interblink interval increased during reading compared with conversation and walking. Changes in blinking were immediate, sustained, and not associated with ocular surface symptoms or signs.
比较在各种任务中测量到的眨眼情况,并探讨与眼表症状的关系。评估眨眼频率和两次眨眼之间的间隔的日常重复性。
24 名学生(28.6±6.3 岁;8 名男性,16 名女性)完成了一项随机交叉研究中的 6 项阅读任务(印刷文本、笔记本电脑、电视、智能手机、智能手机 50%亮度、智能手机上的复杂文本)和 2 项非阅读任务(对话、步行)。评估眼表症状和临床体征。使用可穿戴眼动追踪耳机测量眨眼频率和两次眨眼之间的间隔。使用线性混合模型和事后 Bonferroni 校正进行比较,比较任务和时间之间的眨眼参数。评估眨眼、症状、眼表和临床体征之间的相关性(Spearman 相关性)。完成两次智能手机阅读任务以确定重复性系数。
与对话(平均 32.4±12.4 次/分钟;1.5±0.6 秒)和步行(平均 31.3±15.5 次/分钟;1.9±1.3 秒)相比,所有阅读任务中的眨眼频率(平均 10.7±9.7 次/分钟)较低,两次眨眼之间的间隔(平均 9.6±8.7 秒)较长(P<0.001)。在阅读任务之间或在对话和步行之间,眨眼参数之间没有显著差异。在开始任务后的 1 分钟内,眨眼情况发生变化。眨眼频率或两次眨眼之间的间隔与眼表症状或体征之间没有明显的相关性。眨眼频率的重复性系数为±12.4 次/分钟,两次眨眼之间的间隔的重复性系数为±18.8 秒。
可以可靠地原位测量自发眨眼。与对话和步行相比,阅读时眨眼频率降低,两次眨眼之间的间隔增加。眨眼变化是即时的、持续的,与眼表症状或体征无关。