Suppr超能文献

定性证据综合分析与非艾滋病毒传播风险相关的婴儿喂养的价值观和偏好。

Qualitative evidence synthesis of values and preferences to inform infant feeding in the context of non-HIV transmission risk.

机构信息

Health Economics & Decision Science Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242669. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding is recommended by many organisations, but feeding choices can take on complexity against a backdrop of a transmissible infection risk. The aim of this synthesis is to explore what is known about the values and preferences of pregnant women, mothers, family members and health practitioners, policy makers and providers (midwives) concerning feeding when there is a risk of Mother-to-Child transmission [MTCT] of an infectious disease (other than HIV/AIDS) to infants (0-2 years of age).

METHODS

A qualitative evidence synthesis and GRADE CERQual assessment of relevant studies of values and preferences regarding infant feeding options in the context of non-HIV MTCT risk.

RESULTS

The synthesis included eight qualitative studies. Four studies focussed on human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), three studies on Ebola, and one study on influenza vaccination. Mothers reported feeling sadness and guilt at not breastfeeding, while recognising that it was important for the health of their baby not to breastfeed. Mothers were reportedly appreciative of the provision of appropriate facilities, and the advice of those health professionals who knew about the diseases, but felt other professionals lacked knowledge about the transmission risk of conditions such as HTLV-1. All groups expressed concerns about social perceptions of not breastfeeding, as well as the alternatives. The evidence was coherent and relevant, but there were serious concerns about adequacy and methodological limitations, such as potential social desirability bias in some studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This synthesis describes the reported values and preferences of pregnant women, mothers, and others concerning feeding when there is a risk of Mother-to-Child transmission (MTCT) of an infectious disease (other than HIV/AIDS) to an infant when breastfeeding. However, the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature is limited both in quality and quantity.

摘要

背景

许多组织都推荐母乳喂养,但在传染性感染风险的背景下,喂养选择可能变得复杂。本综合研究的目的是探索在存在母婴传播(MTCT)传染病(除艾滋病毒/艾滋病以外)风险的情况下,孕妇、母亲、家庭成员和卫生保健从业者、政策制定者和提供者(助产士)对婴儿喂养的价值观和偏好。

方法

对有关非 HIV MTCT 风险情况下婴儿喂养选择的相关研究进行定性证据综合和 GRADE CERQual 评估。

结果

该综合研究包括 8 项定性研究。其中 4 项研究侧重于人类 T 细胞嗜淋巴细胞病毒 1 型(HTLV-1),3 项研究侧重于埃博拉病毒,1 项研究侧重于流感疫苗接种。母亲们报告说,由于未能母乳喂养而感到悲伤和内疚,但认识到不母乳喂养对婴儿的健康很重要。母亲们表示赞赏提供适当设施和了解这些疾病的卫生专业人员的建议,但感到其他专业人员缺乏关于 HTLV-1 等疾病传播风险的知识。所有群体都对不母乳喂养以及替代方案的社会看法表示担忧。证据是连贯和相关的,但对充分性和方法学限制存在严重关注,例如一些研究中存在潜在的社会期望偏差。

结论

本综合研究描述了孕妇、母亲和其他人员在存在母婴传播(MTCT)传染病(除艾滋病毒/艾滋病以外)风险的情况下,对婴儿喂养的报告价值观和偏好。然而,同行评审文献中的证据在质量和数量上都有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/7707527/775ae5069c46/pone.0242669.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验