• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤患者颅内出血和梗死的影响:一项 CRASH-3 试验患者样本中的预先计划的亚研究。

Effect of tranexamic acid on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pre-planned substudy in a sample of CRASH-3 trial patients.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK

Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):270-278. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210424. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-210424
PMID:33262252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7982942/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early tranexamic acid (TXA) treatment reduces head injury deaths after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We used brain scans that were acquired as part of the routine clinical practice during the CRASH-3 trial (before unblinding) to examine the mechanism of action of TXA in TBI. Specifically, we explored the potential effects of TXA on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction.

METHODS

This is a prospective substudy nested within the CRASH-3 trial, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of TXA (loading dose 1 g over 10 min, then 1 g infusion over 8 hours) in patients with isolated head injury. CRASH-3 trial patients were recruited between July 2012 and January 2019. Participants in the current substudy were a subset of trial patients enrolled at 10 hospitals in the UK and 4 in Malaysia, who had at least one CT head scan performed as part of the routine clinical practice within 28 days of randomisation. The primary outcome was the volume of intraparenchymal haemorrhage (ie, contusion) measured on a CT scan done after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were progressive intracranial haemorrhage (post-randomisation CT shows >25% of volume seen on pre-randomisation CT), new intracranial haemorrhage (any haemorrhage seen on post-randomisation CT but not on pre-randomisation CT), cerebral infarction (any infarction seen on any type of brain scan done post-randomisation, excluding infarction seen pre-randomisation) and intracranial haemorrhage volume (intraparenchymal + intraventricular + subdural + epidural) in those who underwent neurosurgical haemorrhage evacuation. We planned to conduct sensitivity analyses excluding patients who were severely injured at baseline. Dichotomous outcomes were analysed using relative risks (RR) or hazard ratios (HR), and continuous outcomes using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

1767 patients were included in this substudy. One-third of the patients had a baseline GCS (Glasgow Coma Score) of 3 (n=579) and 24% had unilateral or bilateral unreactive pupils. 46% of patients were scanned pre-randomisation and post-randomisation (n=812/1767), 19% were scanned only pre-randomisation (n=341/1767) and 35% were scanned only post-randomisation (n=614/1767). In all patients, there was no evidence that TXA prevents intraparenchymal haemorrhage expansion (estimate=1.09, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.45) or intracranial haemorrhage expansion in patients who underwent neurosurgical haemorrhage evacuation (n=363) (estimate=0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.11). In patients scanned pre-randomisation and post-randomisation (n=812), there was no evidence that TXA reduces progressive haemorrhage (adjusted RR=0.91, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.13) and new haemorrhage (adjusted RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.01). When patients with unreactive pupils at baseline were excluded, there was evidence that TXA prevents new haemorrhage (adjusted RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98). In patients scanned post-randomisation (n=1431), there was no evidence of an increase in infarction with TXA (adjusted HR=1.28, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.76). A larger proportion of patients without (vs with) a post-randomisation scan died from head injury (38% vs 19%: RR=1.97, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.34, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

TXA may prevent new haemorrhage in patients with reactive pupils at baseline. This is consistent with the results of the CRASH-3 trial which found that TXA reduced head injury death in patients with at least one reactive pupil at baseline. However, the large number of patients without post-randomisation scans and the possibility that the availability of scan data depends on whether a patient received TXA, challenges the validity of inferences made using routinely collected scan data. This study highlights the limitations of using routinely collected scan data to examine the effects of TBI treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN15088122.

摘要

背景

早期使用氨甲环酸(TXA)治疗可降低创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的颅脑损伤死亡人数。我们使用 CRASH-3 试验(在未揭盲之前)期间作为常规临床实践的一部分获取的脑部扫描,来检查 TXA 在 TBI 中的作用机制。具体而言,我们探索了 TXA 对颅内出血和梗死的潜在影响。

方法

这是 CRASH-3 试验的一项前瞻性嵌套子研究,该试验是一项 TXA(负荷剂量 1g 静脉输注 10 分钟,然后 1g 输注 8 小时)治疗单纯性颅脑损伤患者的随机安慰剂对照试验。CRASH-3 试验的患者于 2012 年 7 月至 2019 年 1 月期间招募。当前子研究的参与者是在英国的 10 家医院和马来西亚的 4 家医院入组的试验患者的一个子集,他们在随机分组后 28 天内至少进行了一次 CT 头部扫描作为常规临床实践的一部分。主要结局是随机分组后 CT 扫描显示的脑实质出血(即挫伤)体积。次要结局包括进行性颅内出血(随机分组后 CT 显示的体积比随机分组前 CT 显示的体积增加>25%)、新的颅内出血(随机分组后 CT 显示但随机分组前 CT 未显示的任何出血)、脑梗死(随机分组后任何类型的脑部扫描均可见的任何梗死,不包括随机分组前可见的梗死)和行神经外科血肿清除术患者的颅内出血体积(脑实质内+脑室内+硬膜下+硬膜外)。我们计划进行敏感性分析,排除基线严重损伤的患者。二分类结局采用相对风险(RR)或危险比(HR)进行分析,连续结局采用线性混合模型进行分析。

结果

本子研究纳入了 1767 名患者。三分之一的患者基线格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 3(n=579),24%的患者单侧或双侧瞳孔无反应。46%的患者在随机分组前和随机分组后进行了扫描(n=812),24%的患者仅在随机分组前进行了扫描(n=341),35%的患者仅在随机分组后进行了扫描(n=614)。在所有患者中,没有证据表明 TXA 可防止脑实质出血扩大(估计值=1.09,95%CI 0.81 至 1.45)或行神经外科血肿清除术患者的颅内出血扩大(n=363)(估计值=0.79,95%CI 0.57 至 1.11)。在随机分组前和随机分组后进行扫描的患者(n=812)中,没有证据表明 TXA 可减少进行性出血(调整 RR=0.91,95%CI 0.74 至 1.13)和新出血(调整 RR=0.85,95%CI 0.72 至 1.01)。当排除基线时瞳孔无反应的患者后,有证据表明 TXA 可预防新的出血(调整 RR=0.80,95%CI 0.66 至 0.98)。在随机分组后进行扫描的患者(n=1431)中,没有证据表明 TXA 会增加梗死的发生率(调整 HR=1.28,95%CI 0.93 至 1.76)。没有进行随机分组后扫描的患者中,死于颅脑损伤的比例高于进行了随机分组后扫描的患者(38% vs 19%:RR=1.97,95%CI 1.66 至 2.34,p<0.0001)。

结论

TXA 可能预防基线时瞳孔有反应的患者发生新的出血。这与 CRASH-3 试验的结果一致,该试验发现 TXA 降低了基线时至少有一个瞳孔有反应的患者的颅脑损伤死亡人数。然而,大量患者没有进行随机分组后的扫描,并且扫描数据的可用性可能取决于患者是否接受了 TXA,这对使用常规收集的扫描数据得出的结论提出了挑战。本研究强调了使用常规收集的扫描数据来检查 TBI 治疗效果的局限性。

试验注册

ISRCTN85323532。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd2/7982942/ad450470f11b/emermed-2020-210424f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd2/7982942/9372196846ef/emermed-2020-210424f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd2/7982942/ad450470f11b/emermed-2020-210424f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd2/7982942/9372196846ef/emermed-2020-210424f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd2/7982942/ad450470f11b/emermed-2020-210424f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of tranexamic acid on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pre-planned substudy in a sample of CRASH-3 trial patients.氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤患者颅内出血和梗死的影响:一项 CRASH-3 试验患者样本中的预先计划的亚研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):270-278. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210424. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
A nested mechanistic sub-study into the effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo on intracranial haemorrhage and cerebral ischaemia in isolated traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CRASH-3 Trial Intracranial Bleeding Mechanistic Sub-Study [CRASH-3 IBMS]).一项关于氨甲环酸与安慰剂对孤立性创伤性脑损伤颅内出血和脑缺血影响的嵌套机制亚研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(CRASH-3试验颅内出血机制亚研究[CRASH-3 IBMS])
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2073-6.
3
CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage) intracranial bleeding study: the effect of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury--a nested randomised, placebo-controlled trial.CRASH-2(严重出血中抗纤维蛋白溶解剂的临床随机对照试验)颅内出血研究:氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤的影响——一项嵌套随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(13):iii-xii, 1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta16130.
4
Understanding the neuroprotective effect of tranexamic acid: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-3 randomised trial.理解氨甲环酸的神经保护作用:CRASH-3 随机试验的探索性分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Nov 11;24(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03243-4.
5
Tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: an explanatory study nested within the CRASH-3 trial.氨甲环酸治疗创伤性脑损伤:一项嵌套在 CRASH-3 试验中的解释性研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):261-268. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01316-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.氨甲环酸对急性创伤性脑损伤患者死亡、残疾、血管阻塞事件和其他并发症的影响(CRASH-3):一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1713-1723. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32233-0. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Tranexamic acid to reduce head injury death in people with traumatic brain injury: the CRASH-3 international RCT.氨甲环酸减少创伤性脑损伤患者的颅脑损伤死亡:CRASH-3 国际 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Apr;25(26):1-76. doi: 10.3310/hta25260.
8
The CRASH-2 trial: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events and transfusion requirement in bleeding trauma patients.CRASH-2 试验:氨甲环酸对出血创伤患者死亡、血管阻塞事件和输血需求影响的随机对照试验和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(10):1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta17100.
9
A nested randomised trial of the effect of tranexamic acid on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction in traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3 trial intracranial bleeding mechanistic study): Statistical analysis plan.氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤颅内出血和梗死影响的巢式随机试验(CRASH-3试验颅内出血机制研究):统计分析计划
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Nov 27;3:99. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14731.3. eCollection 2018.
10
Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict death in patients with traumatic bleeding, and evaluation of the effect of tranexamic acid on mortality according to baseline risk: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.创伤性出血患者死亡预测预后模型的建立和验证,以及根据基线风险评估氨甲环酸对死亡率影响的评价:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(24):1-45, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17240.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemostatic disturbances in traumatic brain injury: from mechanism to management.创伤性脑损伤中的止血障碍:从机制到管理
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 May 19;167(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06549-w.
2
An Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Prescription and Nonprescription Pharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.评估用于中重度创伤性脑损伤的处方和非处方药物干预的随机对照试验综述
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Nov 16:87551225241296420. doi: 10.1177/87551225241296420.
3
Phenotypes of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Complications, and Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the neuroprotective effect of tranexamic acid: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-3 randomised trial.理解氨甲环酸的神经保护作用:CRASH-3 随机试验的探索性分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Nov 11;24(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03243-4.
2
Tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: an explanatory study nested within the CRASH-3 trial.氨甲环酸治疗创伤性脑损伤:一项嵌套在 CRASH-3 试验中的解释性研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):261-268. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01316-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
脑出血患者的表型、并发症及预后
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02067-2. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
4
Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.氨甲环酸在创伤患者中的有效性:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 11;16(1):e52111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52111. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
The Roles of Electronic Health Records for Clinical Trials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.电子健康记录在低收入和中等收入国家临床试验中的作用:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Nov 22;11:e47052. doi: 10.2196/47052.
6
The efficacy of tranexamic acid treatment with different time and doses for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同时间和剂量的氨甲环酸治疗创伤性脑损伤的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb J. 2022 Dec 19;20(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12959-022-00440-9.
7
Predictive role of shock index in the early formation of cerebral infarction in patients with TBI and cerebral herniation.休克指数在创伤性脑损伤和脑疝患者脑梗死早期形成中的预测作用。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 25;13:956039. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.956039. eCollection 2022.
8
Effect of New Nursing on Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction.新护理对急性脑梗死患者的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 2;2022:1863129. doi: 10.1155/2022/1863129. eCollection 2022.
9
The prevalence and risk factors of posttraumatic cerebral infarction in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颅脑创伤患者创伤后脑梗死的患病率及相关危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bioengineered. 2022 May;13(5):11706-11717. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2070999.
氨甲环酸对急性创伤性脑损伤患者死亡、残疾、血管阻塞事件和其他并发症的影响(CRASH-3):一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1713-1723. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32233-0. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
4
A nested randomised trial of the effect of tranexamic acid on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction in traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3 trial intracranial bleeding mechanistic study): Statistical analysis plan.氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤颅内出血和梗死影响的巢式随机试验(CRASH-3试验颅内出血机制研究):统计分析计划
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Nov 27;3:99. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14731.3. eCollection 2018.
5
Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A Systematic Review.颅脑损伤研究中缺失结局数据的处理:系统评价。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Oct 1;36(19):2743-2752. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6216. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance.脑微出血:影像学表现与临床意义。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):11-28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170803.
7
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.何时以及如何在随机临床试验中使用多重插补来处理缺失数据——附流程图的实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1.
8
Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Prevention of Hemorrhagic Mass Growth in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.氨甲环酸对预防创伤性脑损伤患者血肿体积增大的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e748-e753. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.075. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
9
A nested mechanistic sub-study into the effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo on intracranial haemorrhage and cerebral ischaemia in isolated traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CRASH-3 Trial Intracranial Bleeding Mechanistic Sub-Study [CRASH-3 IBMS]).一项关于氨甲环酸与安慰剂对孤立性创伤性脑损伤颅内出血和脑缺血影响的嵌套机制亚研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(CRASH-3试验颅内出血机制亚研究[CRASH-3 IBMS])
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2073-6.
10
Does tranexamic acid improve outcomes in traumatic brain injury?氨甲环酸能否改善创伤性脑损伤的预后?
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i4814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4814.