• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tranexamic acid to reduce head injury death in people with traumatic brain injury: the CRASH-3 international RCT.氨甲环酸减少创伤性脑损伤患者的颅脑损伤死亡:CRASH-3 国际 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Apr;25(26):1-76. doi: 10.3310/hta25260.
2
Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.氨甲环酸对急性创伤性脑损伤患者死亡、残疾、血管阻塞事件和其他并发症的影响(CRASH-3):一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1713-1723. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32233-0. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
A high-dose 24-hour tranexamic acid infusion for the treatment of significant gastrointestinal bleeding: HALT-IT RCT.高剂量 24 小时氨甲环酸输注治疗严重胃肠道出血:HALT-IT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(58):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta25580.
4
The CRASH-2 trial: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events and transfusion requirement in bleeding trauma patients.CRASH-2 试验:氨甲环酸对出血创伤患者死亡、血管阻塞事件和输血需求影响的随机对照试验和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(10):1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta17100.
5
CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage) intracranial bleeding study: the effect of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury--a nested randomised, placebo-controlled trial.CRASH-2(严重出血中抗纤维蛋白溶解剂的临床随机对照试验)颅内出血研究:氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤的影响——一项嵌套随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(13):iii-xii, 1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta16130.
6
Tranexamic acid to improve functional status in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: the TICH-2 RCT.氨甲环酸改善自发性脑出血成人的功能状态:TICH-2 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jul;23(35):1-48. doi: 10.3310/hta23350.
7
The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial.氨甲环酸治疗创伤出血患者的早期治疗的重要性:CRASH-2 随机对照试验的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2011 Mar 26;377(9771):1096-101, 1101.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60278-X.
8
A nested mechanistic sub-study into the effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo on intracranial haemorrhage and cerebral ischaemia in isolated traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CRASH-3 Trial Intracranial Bleeding Mechanistic Sub-Study [CRASH-3 IBMS]).一项关于氨甲环酸与安慰剂对孤立性创伤性脑损伤颅内出血和脑缺血影响的嵌套机制亚研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(CRASH-3试验颅内出血机制亚研究[CRASH-3 IBMS])
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2073-6.
9
Early high-dose cryoprecipitate to reduce mortality in adult patients with traumatic haemorrhage: the CRYOSTAT-2 RCT with cost-effectiveness analysis.早期大剂量冷沉淀治疗减少创伤性出血成年患者死亡率:CRYOSTAT-2 RCT 与成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Nov;28(76):1-69. doi: 10.3310/JYTR6938.
10
Effect of tranexamic acid on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pre-planned substudy in a sample of CRASH-3 trial patients.氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤患者颅内出血和梗死的影响:一项 CRASH-3 试验患者样本中的预先计划的亚研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):270-278. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210424. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Application and research progress of tranexamic acid in the perioperative period of posterior lumbar interbody fusion.氨甲环酸在后路腰椎椎间融合术围手术期的应用及研究进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;12:1612281. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1612281. eCollection 2025.
2
Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.创伤大出血的输血策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD012635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012635.pub2.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.氨甲环酸治疗创伤性脑损伤的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):e73781. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73781. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
An Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Prescription and Nonprescription Pharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.评估用于中重度创伤性脑损伤的处方和非处方药物干预的随机对照试验综述
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Nov 16:87551225241296420. doi: 10.1177/87551225241296420.
5
A Modern Approach to the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤治疗的现代方法。
Medicines (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;11(5):10. doi: 10.3390/medicines11050010.
6
Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of tranexamic acid in adult trauma patients.成年创伤患者氨甲环酸的群体药代动力学建模与模拟。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;90(8):1932-1941. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16075. Epub 2024 May 2.
7
Does tranexamic acid have a positive effect on the outcome of older multiple trauma patients on antithrombotic drugs? An analysis using the TraumaRegister DGU.氨甲环酸对正在使用抗血栓药物的老年多发伤患者的治疗结果有积极影响吗?一项使用创伤注册数据库DGU的分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 20;11:1324073. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1324073. eCollection 2024.
8
Effects of decompressive craniectomy combined with edaravone on postoperative neurological functions and hemodynamics of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.去骨瓣减压术联合依达拉奉对重型颅脑损伤患者术后神经功能及血流动力学的影响。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2024 Jan;29(1):25-31. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230057.
9
A dynamic nomogram for predicting intraoperative brain bulge during decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.一种用于预测创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术中术中脑膨出的动态列线图:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):909-920. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000892.
10
HBOT has a better cognitive outcome than NBH for patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial.高压氧治疗对轻度颅脑创伤患者的认知结局优于常压氧治疗:一项随机对照临床试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35215. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035215.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tranexamic acid for the treatment of traumatic brain injury, based on the results of the CRASH-3 randomised trial: a decision modelling approach.基于 CRASH-3 随机试验结果的氨甲环酸治疗创伤性脑损伤的成本效果分析:决策建模方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002716.
2
Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.氨甲环酸对急性创伤性脑损伤患者死亡、残疾、血管阻塞事件和其他并发症的影响(CRASH-3):一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1713-1723. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32233-0. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Implementation of tranexamic acid for bleeding trauma patients: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study.氨甲环酸在出血创伤患者中的应用:一项纵向和横断面研究。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Feb;36(2):78-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207693. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
4
Tranexamic acid for significant traumatic brain injury (The CRASH-3 trial): Statistical analysis plan for an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.氨甲环酸用于重度创伤性脑损伤(CRASH-3试验):一项国际随机双盲安慰剂对照试验的统计分析计划
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Sep 26;3:86. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14700.2. eCollection 2018.
5
Prospective evaluation of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) score: minor differences in patients with major versus no or mild traumatic brain injury at one-year follow up.前瞻性评估脑损伤后生活质量(QOLIBRI)评分:在一年随访时,重度颅脑损伤患者与无或轻度颅脑损伤患者之间存在较小差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0966-z.
6
Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury.估计创伤性脑损伤的全球发病率。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1.
7
Effect of treatment delay on the effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytics in acute severe haemorrhage: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 40 138 bleeding patients.治疗延迟对急性严重出血中抗纤溶药物有效性和安全性的影响:对40138例出血患者个体水平数据的荟萃分析
Lancet. 2018 Jan 13;391(10116):125-132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32455-8. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Health State Preference Weights for the Glasgow Outcome Scale Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study.创伤性脑损伤后格拉斯哥预后量表的健康状态偏好权重:一项系统评价与图谱研究
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):141-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2398. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Returns on Research Funded Under the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme: Economic Analysis and Case Studies.英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估(HTA)计划资助研究的回报:经济分析与案例研究
Rand Health Q. 2016 May 9;5(4):5.
10
Does tranexamic acid improve outcomes in traumatic brain injury?氨甲环酸能否改善创伤性脑损伤的预后?
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i4814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4814.

氨甲环酸减少创伤性脑损伤患者的颅脑损伤死亡:CRASH-3 国际 RCT。

Tranexamic acid to reduce head injury death in people with traumatic brain injury: the CRASH-3 international RCT.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

RoadPeace, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2021 Apr;25(26):1-76. doi: 10.3310/hta25260.

DOI:10.3310/hta25260
PMID:33928903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8107835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid safely reduces mortality in traumatic extracranial bleeding. Intracranial bleeding is common after traumatic brain injury and can cause brain herniation and death. We assessed the effects of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability and vascular occlusive events in traumatic brain injury patients. We also assessed cost-effectiveness.

DESIGN

Randomised trial and economic evaluation. Patients were assigned by selecting a numbered treatment pack from a box containing eight packs that were identical apart from the pack number. Patients, caregivers and those assessing outcomes were masked to allocation. All analyses were by intention to treat. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of tranexamic acid versus no treatment from a UK NHS perspective using the trial results and a Markov model.

SETTING

175 hospitals in 29 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with traumatic brain injury within 3 hours of injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤ 12 or any intracranial bleeding on computerised tomography scan, and no major extracranial bleeding, were eligible.

INTERVENTION

Tranexamic acid (loading dose 1 g over 10 minutes then infusion of 1 g over 8 hours) or matching placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Head injury death in hospital within 28 days of injury in patients treated within 3 hours of injury. Secondary outcomes were early head injury deaths, all-cause and cause-specific mortality, disability, vascular occlusive events, seizures, complications and adverse events.

RESULTS

Among patients treated within 3 hours of injury ( = 9127), the risk of head injury death was 18.5% in the tranexamic acid group versus 19.8% in the placebo group (855/4613 vs. 892/4514; risk ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.02). In a prespecified analysis excluding patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or bilateral unreactive pupils at baseline, the results were 12.5% in the tranexamic acid group versus 14.0% in the placebo group (485/3880 vs. 525/3757; risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.00). There was a reduction in the risk of head injury death with tranexamic acid in those with mild to moderate head injury (166/2846 vs. 207/2769; risk ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.95), but in those with severe head injury (689/1739 vs. 685/1710; risk ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.07) there was no apparent reduction (-value for heterogeneity = 0.030). Early treatment was more effective in mild and moderate head injury ( = 0.005), but there was no obvious impact of time to treatment in cases of severe head injury ( = 0.73). The risk of disability, vascular occlusive events and seizures was similar in both groups. Tranexamic acid is highly cost-effective for mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (base case of £4288 per quality-adjusted life-year gained).

CONCLUSION

Early tranexamic acid treatment reduces head injury deaths. Treatment is cost-effective for patients with mild or moderate traumatic brain injury, or those with both pupils reactive.

FUTURE WORK

Further trials should examine early tranexamic acid treatment in mild head injury. Research on alternative routes of administration is needed.

LIMITATIONS

Time to treatment may have been underestimated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15088122, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01402882, EudraCT 2011-003669-14, Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR20121000441277.

FUNDING

The project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 25, No. 26. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. In addition, funding was provided by JP Moulton Charitable Trust, Joint Global Health Trials (Medical Research Council, Department for International Development and the Wellcome Trust). This project was funded by the NIHR Global Health Trials programme.

摘要

背景

氨甲环酸可安全降低创伤性颅外出血患者的死亡率。创伤性脑损伤后常发生颅内出血,并可导致脑疝和死亡。我们评估了氨甲环酸在创伤性脑损伤患者中的作用。

目的

评估氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤患者死亡、残疾和血管闭塞事件的影响。我们还评估了成本效益。

设计

随机试验和经济评估。通过从包含 8 个包装的盒子中选择一个编号的治疗包来分配患者,除了包装编号外,这些包装完全相同。患者、护理人员和评估结果的人员对分配情况不知情。所有分析均基于意向治疗。我们使用试验结果和马尔可夫模型从英国国民健康保险制度的角度评估了氨甲环酸与无治疗相比的成本效益。

地点

29 个国家的 175 家医院。

参与者

损伤后 3 小时内、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12 分或计算机断层扫描显示任何颅内出血、无重大颅外出血的成年创伤性脑损伤患者。

干预措施

氨甲环酸(负荷剂量 1 g 静脉滴注 10 分钟,然后输注 1 g 持续 8 小时)或匹配的安慰剂。

主要结局指标

损伤后 28 天内院内创伤性脑损伤死亡。次要结局指标包括早期创伤性脑损伤死亡、全因和病因特异性死亡率、残疾、血管闭塞事件、癫痫发作、并发症和不良事件。

结果

在损伤后 3 小时内接受治疗的患者中(n=9127),氨甲环酸组的创伤性脑损伤死亡风险为 18.5%,安慰剂组为 19.8%(855/4613 与 892/4514;风险比 0.94,95%置信区间 0.86 至 1.02)。在一项预先指定的排除基线格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 3 分或双侧无反应瞳孔的患者分析中,氨甲环酸组的结果为 12.5%,安慰剂组为 14.0%(485/3880 与 525/3757;风险比 0.89,95%置信区间 0.80 至 1.00)。在轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤患者中,氨甲环酸降低了创伤性脑损伤死亡的风险(166/2846 与 207/2769;风险比 0.78,95%置信区间 0.64 至 0.95),但在重度创伤性脑损伤患者中(689/1739 与 685/1710;风险比 0.99,95%置信区间 0.91 至 1.07),未见明显减少(异质性检验值=0.030)。轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤的早期治疗更为有效(P=0.005),但重度创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗时间无明显影响(P=0.73)。两组的残疾、血管闭塞事件和癫痫发作风险相似。氨甲环酸对轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤具有高度成本效益(获得每质量调整生命年的成本为 4288 英镑)。

结论

早期氨甲环酸治疗可降低创伤性脑损伤死亡。对于轻度或中度创伤性脑损伤或双侧瞳孔反应性的患者,治疗具有成本效益。

未来工作

应进一步研究轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的早期氨甲环酸治疗。需要研究替代给药途径。

局限性

治疗时间可能被低估。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN85112024,临床试验.gov NCT01402882,EudraCT 2011-003669-14,泛非临床试验登记处 PACTR20121000441277。

资金

该项目由英国国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划资助,将在 ; Vol. 25, No. 26 中全文发表。请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站以获取更多项目信息。此外,JP Moulton 慈善信托基金、全球卫生试验联合组织(医学研究理事会、国际发展部和惠康信托基金)也为该项目提供了资金。该项目由英国国民健康保险制度全球卫生试验计划资助。