Suppr超能文献

女性在 ASM 期刊中的代表性不足,且获得的成果存在差异:一项六年回顾性分析。

Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

mBio. 2020 Dec 1;11(6):e01680-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01680-20.

Abstract

Despite 50% of biology Ph.D. graduates being women, the number of women that advance in academia decreases at each level (e.g., from graduate to postdoctorate to tenure track). Recently, scientific societies and publishers have begun examining internal submissions data to evaluate representation and evaluation of women in their peer review processes; however, representation and attitudes differ by scientific field, and to date, no studies have investigated academic publishing in the field of microbiology. Using manuscripts submitted between January 2012 and August 2018 to the 15 journals published by the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), we describe the representation of women at ASM journals and the outcomes of their manuscripts. Senior women authors at ASM journals were underrepresented compared to global and society estimates of microbiology researchers. Additionally, manuscripts submitted by corresponding authors that were women received more negative outcomes than those submitted by men. These negative outcomes were somewhat mediated by whether or not the corresponding author was based in the United States and by the type of institution for United States-based authors. Nonetheless, the pattern for women corresponding authors to receive more negative outcomes on their submitted manuscripts held. We conclude with suggestions to improve the representation of women and decrease structural penalties against women. Barriers in science and academia have prevented women from becoming researchers and experts that are viewed as equivalent to their colleagues who are men. We evaluated the participation and success of women researchers at ASM journals to better understand their success in the field of microbiology. We found that women are underrepresented as expert scientists at ASM journals. This is, in part, due to a combination of both low submissions from senior women authors and more negative outcomes on submitted manuscripts for women compared to men.

摘要

尽管有 50%的生物学博士毕业生是女性,但在学术界中,女性在每个层次上的晋升人数都在减少(例如,从研究生到博士后再到终身教职)。最近,科学学会和出版商开始检查内部提交的数据,以评估女性在同行评审过程中的代表性和评价;然而,代表性和态度因科学领域而异,迄今为止,尚无研究调查过微生物学领域的学术出版。我们使用 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间提交给美国微生物学会(ASM)出版的 15 种期刊的手稿,描述了 ASM 期刊上女性的代表性以及她们的手稿的结果。ASM 期刊的资深女性作者在数量上低于全球和学会对微生物学研究人员的估计。此外,由女性通讯作者提交的手稿比由男性提交的手稿获得更多的负面结果。这些负面结果在一定程度上受到通讯作者是否来自美国以及美国作者所在机构类型的影响。尽管如此,女性通讯作者收到的提交稿件负面结果更多的模式仍然存在。我们最后提出了一些建议,以改善女性的代表性,并减少对女性的结构性惩罚。科学和学术界的障碍使女性无法成为与男性同事同等的研究人员和专家。我们评估了 ASM 期刊上女性研究人员的参与和成功情况,以更好地了解她们在微生物学领域的成功。我们发现,ASM 期刊上的女性作为专家科学家的代表性不足。这部分是由于资深女性作者提交的稿件数量较少,以及与男性相比,女性提交的稿件获得的负面结果更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ed/7733940/9ad10a9a6568/mBio.01680-20-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验