Suppr超能文献

六本生态与进化领域期刊同行评审结果及稿件影响力的性别差异

Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution.

作者信息

Fox Charles W, Paine C E Timothy

机构信息

Department of Entomology University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky.

Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale New South Wales Australia.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 4;9(6):3599-3619. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4993. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Abstract

The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in controlled experiments, suggesting conscious or unconscious gender biases in assessment. The degree to which editors and reviewers of scholarly journals exhibit gender biases that influence outcomes of the peer-review process remains uncertain due to substantial variation among studies. We test whether gender predicts the outcomes of editorial and peer review for >23,000 research manuscripts submitted to six journals in ecology and evolution from 2010 to 2015. Papers with female and male first authors were equally likely to be sent for peer review. However, papers with female first authors obtained, on average, slightly worse peer-review scores and were more likely to be rejected after peer review, though the difference varied among journals. These gender differences appear to be partly due to differences in authorial roles. Papers for the which the first author deferred corresponding authorship to a coauthor (which women do more often than men) obtained significantly worse peer-review scores and were less likely to get positive editorial decisions. Gender differences in corresponding authorship explained some of the gender differences in peer-review scores and positive editorial decisions. In contrast to these observations on submitted manuscripts, gender differences in peer-review outcomes were observed in a survey of >12,000 published manuscripts; women reported similar rates of rejection (from a prior journal) before eventual publication. After publication, papers with female authors were cited less often than those with male authors, though the differences are very small (~2%). Our data do not allow us to test hypotheses about mechanisms underlying the gender discrepancies we observed, but strongly support the conclusion that papers authored by women have lower acceptance rates and are less well cited than are papers authored by men in ecology.

摘要

在对照实验中,男性的生产力和表现通常比女性得到更高的评价,这表明在评估中存在有意识或无意识的性别偏见。由于研究之间存在很大差异,学术期刊的编辑和审稿人表现出影响同行评审过程结果的性别偏见的程度仍不确定。我们测试了性别是否能预测2010年至2015年提交给六本生态与进化领域期刊的23000多篇研究手稿的编辑和同行评审结果。第一作者为女性和男性的论文被送去同行评审的可能性相同。然而,第一作者为女性的论文平均获得的同行评审分数略低,并且在同行评审后更有可能被拒绝,不过不同期刊之间的差异有所不同。这些性别差异似乎部分归因于作者角色的差异。第一作者将通讯作者身份让给共同作者的论文(女性比男性更常这样做)获得的同行评审分数明显更低,并且获得积极编辑决定的可能性更小。通讯作者身份的性别差异解释了同行评审分数和积极编辑决定方面的一些性别差异。与对提交手稿观察结果形成对比的是,在对12000多篇已发表手稿的调查中发现了同行评审结果的性别差异;女性报告在最终发表之前(来自之前期刊)的拒稿率相似。发表后,女性作者的论文被引用的频率低于男性作者的论文,尽管差异非常小(约2%)。我们的数据不允许我们检验关于我们所观察到的性别差异背后机制的假设,但有力地支持了这样的结论:在生态学领域,女性撰写的论文接受率较低,且被引用的情况不如男性撰写的论文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f0b/6434606/7820efdcf208/ECE3-9-3599-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验