Suppr超能文献

农村初级保健中物质使用筛查的早期实施:快速分析定性研究。

Early implementation of screening for substance use in rural primary care: A rapid analytic qualitative study.

机构信息

Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

The Dartmouth Institute (TDI) for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):678-691. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1827125. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Abstract

Few primary care patients are screened for substance use. As part of a phased feasibility study examining the implementation of electronic health record-integrated screening with the Tobacco, Alcohol, and Prescription Medication Screening (TAPS) Tool and clinical decision support (CDS) in rural primary care clinics, focus groups were conducted to identify early indicators of success and challenges to screening implementation. Focus groups ( = 6) were conducted with medical assistants (MAs:  = 3: 19 participants) and primary care providers (PCPs:  = 3: 13 participants) approximately one month following screening implementation in three Federally Qualified Health Centers in Maine. Rapid analysis and matrix analysis using Proctor's Taxonomy of Implementation Outcomes were used to explore implementation outcomes. There was consensus that screening is being used, but use of the CDS was lower, in part due to limited positive screens. Fidelity was high among MAs, though discomfort with the CDS surfaced among PCPs, impacting adoption and fidelity. The TAPS Tool's content, credibility and ease of workflow integration were favorably assessed. Challenges include screening solely at annual visits and self-administered screening for certain patients. Results reveal indicators of implementation success and strategies to address challenges to screening for substance use in primary care.

摘要

很少有初级保健患者接受药物使用筛查。作为一项分阶段可行性研究的一部分,该研究旨在检验在农村初级保健诊所中通过电子健康记录整合 TAPS 工具(烟草、酒精和处方药物筛查工具)和临床决策支持(CDS)进行筛查的实施情况,我们开展了焦点小组讨论,以确定筛查实施的早期成功指标和挑战。在缅因州的三个合格的联邦健康中心实施筛查大约一个月后,对医疗助理(MA: = 3:19 名参与者)和初级保健提供者(PCP: = 3:13 名参与者)进行了焦点小组讨论。快速分析和使用 Proctor 的实施结果分类法进行矩阵分析,用于探讨实施结果。焦点小组讨论得出的共识是,虽然由于阳性筛查结果有限,CDS 的使用频率较低,但筛查正在进行。MA 的保真度较高,而 PCP 对 CDS 的不适应影响了其采用和保真度。TAPS 工具的内容、可信度和工作流程整合的易用性得到了积极评价。挑战包括仅在年度就诊时进行筛查以及某些患者进行自我筛查。研究结果揭示了实施成功的指标和解决初级保健中药物使用筛查挑战的策略。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research.从混沌中理清头绪:在实施研究中运用理论。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112461. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jun 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验