The Dartmouth Institute (TDI) for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Dec;34(12):2824-2832. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05232-y.
Substance use frequently goes undetected in primary care. Though barriers to implementing systematic screening for alcohol and drug use have been examined in urban settings, less is known about screening in rural primary care.
To identify current screening practices, barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for the implementation of substance use screening in rural federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).
As part of a multi-phase study implementing electronic health record-integrated screening, focus groups (n = 60: all stakeholder groups) and individual interviews (n = 10 primary care providers (PCPs)) were conducted.
Three stakeholder groups (PCPs, medical assistants (MAs), and patients) at three rural FQHCs in Maine.
Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed. Themes surrounding current substance use screening practices, barriers to screening, and recommendations for implementation were identified and organized by the Knowledge to Action (KTA) Framework.
Identifying the problem: Stakeholders unanimously agreed that screening is important, and that universal screening is preferred to targeted approaches. Adapting to the local context: PCPs and MAs agreed that screening should be done annually. Views were mixed regarding the delivery of screening; patients preferred self-administered, tablet-based screening, while MAs and PCPs were divided between self-administered and face-to-face approaches. Assessing barriers: For patients, barriers to screening centered around a perceived lack of rapport with providers, which contributed to concerns about trust, judgment, and privacy. For PCPs and MAs, barriers included lack of comfort, training, and preparedness to address screening results and offer treatment.
Though stakeholders agree on the importance of implementing universal screening, concerns about the patient-provider relationship, the consequences of disclosure, and privacy appear heightened by the rural context. Findings highlight that strong relationships with providers are critical for patients, while in-clinic resources and training are needed to increase provider comfort and preparedness to address substance use.
物质使用在初级保健中经常未被发现。尽管在城市环境中已经研究了实施酒精和药物使用系统筛查的障碍,但对于农村初级保健中的筛查知之甚少。
确定当前农村联邦合格健康中心 (FQHC) 中物质使用筛查的实施现状、障碍、促进因素和建议。
作为实施电子健康记录集成筛查的多阶段研究的一部分,进行了焦点小组(n=60:所有利益相关者群体)和个人访谈(n=10 名初级保健提供者 (PCP))。
缅因州三家农村 FQHC 的三个利益相关者群体(PCP、医疗助理 (MA) 和患者)。
记录焦点小组和访谈,转录并进行内容分析。根据知识转化 (KTA) 框架确定并组织了围绕当前物质使用筛查实践、筛查障碍以及实施建议的主题。
识别问题:利益相关者一致认为筛查很重要,并且普遍筛查优于有针对性的方法。适应当地情况:PCP 和 MA 都同意每年进行筛查。关于筛查的提供方式存在不同意见;患者更喜欢自我管理的平板电脑筛查,而 MA 和 PCP 则分为自我管理和面对面的方法。评估障碍:对于患者,筛查障碍主要集中在与提供者缺乏融洽关系上,这导致对信任、判断和隐私的担忧。对于 PCP 和 MA,障碍包括缺乏舒适感、培训和准备来处理筛查结果并提供治疗。
尽管利益相关者一致认为实施普遍筛查很重要,但农村背景似乎增加了对患者与提供者关系、披露后果和隐私的关注。研究结果强调,与提供者的牢固关系对患者至关重要,而诊所内的资源和培训对于提高提供者的舒适度和准备程度以解决物质使用问题是必要的。