Suppr超能文献

保险和社区社会经济地位对乳腺癌治疗临床试验临床结局的影响。

Impact of insurance and neighborhood socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes in therapeutic clinical trials for breast cancer.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):45-52. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3542. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of insurance and neighborhood SES (nSES) on chemotherapy completion and overall mortality among participants in breast cancer clinical trials. The data sources for this study were two adjuvant breast cancer trials (ECOG E1199 and E5103) collectively including 9790 women. Insurance status at trial registration was categorized into private, government (Medicaid, Medicare, and other government type insurance), and self-pay. An Agency for Healthcare Research Quality (AHRQ) nSES index was calculated using residential zip codes linked to county level data on occupation, income, poverty, wealth, education, and crowding. Logistic regression and Cox Proportional Hazard models estimated odds ratios (OR) for chemotherapy treatment completion and hazard ratios (HR) for mortality, respectively, for insurance status and nSES. The models adjusted for: race, age, tumor size, nodal status, hormone receptor status, and primary surgery. The majority of patients had private insurance at trial registration: E1199: 85.6% (4154/4854) and E5103: 82.4% (3987/4836); median SES index was 53.8 (range: 41.8-66.8) and 54.1 (range: 44.5-66.1), respectively. Patients with government insurance were less likely to complete chemotherapy treatment (E1199 OR (95%CI): 0.73 (0.57-0.94); E5103 0.76 (0.64-0.91)) and had an increased risk of death (E1199 HR (95%CI): 1.44 (1.22-1.70); E5103 1.29 (1.06-1.58)) compared to the privately insured patients. There was no association between nSES and chemotherapy completion or overall mortality. Patients with government insurance at trial registration appeared to face barriers in chemotherapy completion and had a higher overall mortality compared to their privately insured counterparts.

摘要

本研究旨在评估保险和邻里社会经济地位(nSES)对乳腺癌临床试验参与者完成化疗和总死亡率的影响。本研究的数据来源于两项辅助乳腺癌试验(ECOG E1199 和 E5103),共纳入 9790 名女性。试验注册时的保险状况分为私人保险、政府保险(医疗补助、医疗保险和其他政府类型保险)和自费。使用与县一级职业、收入、贫困、财富、教育和拥挤程度数据相链接的住宅邮政编码计算了医疗保健研究质量局(AHRQ)nSES 指数。逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险模型分别估计了保险状况和 nSES 对化疗治疗完成的比值比(OR)和死亡率的风险比(HR)。模型调整了种族、年龄、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、激素受体状态和主要手术。大多数患者在试验注册时拥有私人保险:E1199:85.6%(4154/4854)和 E5103:82.4%(3987/4836);中位 SES 指数分别为 53.8(范围:41.8-66.8)和 54.1(范围:44.5-66.1)。拥有政府保险的患者完成化疗治疗的可能性较低(E1199 OR(95%CI):0.73(0.57-0.94);E5103 0.76(0.64-0.91)),并且死亡风险增加(E1199 HR(95%CI):1.44(1.22-1.70);E5103 1.29(1.06-1.58))与私人保险患者相比。nSES 与化疗完成或总死亡率之间没有关联。试验注册时拥有政府保险的患者在完成化疗方面似乎面临障碍,并且与私人保险患者相比,总死亡率更高。

相似文献

6
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
7
Relationship between insurance status and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in Missouri.
Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;127(6):931-937. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33330. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 29;329(5):326-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307293290507.
9
Breast cancer outcomes among older women: HMO, fee-for-service, and delivery system comparisons.
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):189-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.91112.x.
10
Disparities in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are linked to insurance status.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1691-1700.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.044. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Social Factors on the Benefits of Breastfeeding.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02382-0.
2
Study on the additional financial burden of breast cancer disease on cancer patients and their families. Financial toxicity in cancer.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;12:1324334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324334. eCollection 2024.
5
Cost of Failure to Achieve Textbook Outcomes: Association of Insurance Type with Outcomes and Cumulative Cost for Inpatient Surgery.
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Feb 1;236(2):352-364. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000468. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Leveling Up: Examining the Impact of Neighborhood Social Vulnerability on Comorbid Cardiovascular and Cancer Mortality.
JACC CardioOncol. 2022 Sep 20;4(3):338-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.08.006. eCollection 2022 Sep.

本文引用的文献

7
Trends in Cancer Survival by Health Insurance Status in California From 1997 to 2014.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):317-323. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3846.
8
Factors That Contributed to Black-White Disparities in Survival Among Nonelderly Women With Breast Cancer Between 2004 and 2013.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):14-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7932. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
Breast Cancer Disparities: Socioeconomic Factors versus Biology.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):2869-2875. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5977-1. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验