• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变化环境中有限理性决策的非平衡关系

Non-Equilibrium Relations for Bounded Rational Decision-Making in Changing Environments.

作者信息

Grau-Moya Jordi, Krüger Matthias, Braun Daniel A

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart 70569, Germany.

Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen 72076, Germany.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2017 Dec 21;20(1):1. doi: 10.3390/e20010001.

DOI:10.3390/e20010001
PMID:33265092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7512193/
Abstract

Living organisms from single cells to humans need to adapt continuously to respond to changes in their environment. The process of behavioural adaptation can be thought of as improving decision-making performance according to some utility function. Here, we consider an abstract model of organisms as decision-makers with limited information-processing resources that trade off between maximization of utility and computational costs measured by a relative entropy, in a similar fashion to thermodynamic systems undergoing isothermal transformations. Such systems minimize the free energy to reach equilibrium states that balance internal energy and entropic cost. When there is a fast change in the environment, these systems evolve in a non-equilibrium fashion because they are unable to follow the path of equilibrium distributions. Here, we apply concepts from non-equilibrium thermodynamics to characterize decision-makers that adapt to changing environments under the assumption that the temporal evolution of the utility function is externally driven and does not depend on the decision-maker's action. This allows one to quantify performance loss due to imperfect adaptation in a general manner and, additionally, to find relations for decision-making similar to Crooks' fluctuation theorem and Jarzynski's equality. We provide simulations of several exemplary decision and inference problems in the discrete and continuous domains to illustrate the new relations.

摘要

从单细胞生物到人类,所有生物都需要不断适应以应对环境变化。行为适应过程可以被看作是根据某种效用函数来提高决策性能。在此,我们将生物视为具有有限信息处理资源的决策者,构建一个抽象模型,这些决策者在效用最大化和以相对熵衡量的计算成本之间进行权衡,类似于经历等温变换的热力学系统。此类系统通过最小化自由能来达到平衡状态,该平衡状态平衡了内能和熵成本。当环境发生快速变化时,这些系统以非平衡方式演化,因为它们无法遵循平衡分布的路径。在此,我们应用非平衡热力学的概念来刻画决策者,这些决策者在效用函数的时间演化由外部驱动且不依赖于决策者行动的假设下适应不断变化的环境。这使得人们能够以一种通用方式量化由于不完全适应导致的性能损失,此外,还能找到类似于克鲁克斯涨落定理和雅津斯基等式的决策关系。我们提供了离散和连续域中几个示例性决策和推理问题的模拟,以说明这些新关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/22dcb4adec1b/entropy-20-00001-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/fe78b945d7f2/entropy-20-00001-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/a96c7fdac52c/entropy-20-00001-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/c6ffb2f1b9b5/entropy-20-00001-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/58decde49ad2/entropy-20-00001-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/22dcb4adec1b/entropy-20-00001-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/fe78b945d7f2/entropy-20-00001-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/a96c7fdac52c/entropy-20-00001-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/c6ffb2f1b9b5/entropy-20-00001-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/58decde49ad2/entropy-20-00001-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/7512193/22dcb4adec1b/entropy-20-00001-g005a.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-Equilibrium Relations for Bounded Rational Decision-Making in Changing Environments.变化环境中有限理性决策的非平衡关系
Entropy (Basel). 2017 Dec 21;20(1):1. doi: 10.3390/e20010001.
2
Jarzyski's Equality and Crooks' Fluctuation Theorem for General Markov Chains with Application to Decision-Making Systems.适用于决策系统的一般马尔可夫链的雅尔齐斯基等式与克鲁克斯涨落定理
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;24(12):1731. doi: 10.3390/e24121731.
3
Estimation of free-energy differences from computed work distributions: an application of Jarzynski's equality.从计算得到的功分布估计自由能差:雅可比等式的应用。
J Phys Chem B. 2012 Sep 13;116(36):10986-95. doi: 10.1021/jp300527q. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
4
A Reward-Maximizing Spiking Neuron as a Bounded Rational Decision Maker.作为有限理性决策者的奖励最大化脉冲神经元
Neural Comput. 2015 Aug;27(8):1686-720. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00758. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: "HiPen", a New Dataset for Validating (S)QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.好的,坏的,丑的:“HiPen”,一个用于验证(S)QM/MM 自由能模拟的新数据集。
Molecules. 2019 Feb 14;24(4):681. doi: 10.3390/molecules24040681.
6
Normative decision rules in changing environments.规范决策规则在不断变化的环境中。
Elife. 2022 Oct 25;11:e79824. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79824.
7
Computational rationality: linking mechanism and behavior through bounded utility maximization.计算理性:通过有限效用最大化将机制与行为联系起来。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;6(2):279-311. doi: 10.1111/tops.12086. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
Reconstructing multiple free energy pathways of DNA stretching from single molecule experiments.通过单分子实验重建DNA拉伸的多条自由能路径。
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Apr 23;119(16):5132-5. doi: 10.1021/jp511348r. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Fluctuation theorems from Bayesian retrodiction.贝叶斯追溯的涨落定理。
Phys Rev E. 2021 May;103(5-1):052111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.052111.
10
Equilibrium information from nonequilibrium measurements in an experimental test of Jarzynski's equality.在对雅尔津斯基等式的实验测试中,从非平衡测量中获取的平衡信息。
Science. 2002 Jun 7;296(5574):1832-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1071152.

引用本文的文献

1
Jarzyski's Equality and Crooks' Fluctuation Theorem for General Markov Chains with Application to Decision-Making Systems.适用于决策系统的一般马尔可夫链的雅尔齐斯基等式与克鲁克斯涨落定理
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;24(12):1731. doi: 10.3390/e24121731.
2
Optimal evolutionary decision-making to store immune memory.最优进化决策以存储免疫记忆。
Elife. 2021 Apr 28;10:e61346. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61346.
3
Bio-inspired feedback-circuit implementation of discrete, free energy optimizing, winner-take-all computations.基于生物启发的离散、自由能优化、胜者全得计算的反馈电路实现。

本文引用的文献

1
The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.锚定偏差反映了认知资源的理性使用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):322-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1286-8.
2
Empirical evidence for resource-rational anchoring and adjustment.资源合理锚定与调整的实证证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):775-784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1288-6.
3
Decision Making in the Arrow of Time.时间之箭中的决策制定
Biol Cybern. 2016 Jun;110(2-3):135-50. doi: 10.1007/s00422-016-0684-8. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
Phys Rev Lett. 2015 Dec 18;115(25):250602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250602. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
4
Learning in neural networks based on a generalized fluctuation theorem.基于广义涨落定理的神经网络学习。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015;92(5):052710. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052710. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Jarzynski equality, Crooks fluctuation theorem, and the fluctuation theorems of heat for arbitrary initial states.贾兹温斯基等式、克鲁克斯涨落定理以及任意初始状态下的热涨落定理。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Jul;92(1):012131. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012131. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
6
Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines.计算理性:大脑、心智和机器智能的趋同范式。
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):273-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6076. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
Economic reasoning and artificial intelligence.经济推理与人工智能。
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):267-72. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8403. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
8
Relation between the psychological and thermodynamic arrows of time.时间的心理箭头与热力学箭头之间的关系。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 May;89(5):052102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052102. Epub 2014 May 2.
9
One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples.一劳永逸?基于极少样本的最优决策。
Cogn Sci. 2014 May-Jun;38(4):599-637. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12101. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good.感知运动、认知和基于描述的决策似乎同样有效。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 1;110(40):16271-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300239110. Epub 2013 Sep 18.