Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN)-Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Rejuvenation Res. 2021 Jun;24(3):213-219. doi: 10.1089/rej.2020.2344. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Clinically viable screening tools for detecting individuals at heightened risk for mobility limitations is warranted. However, it remains unclear in acutely hospitalized patients (>75 years) whether handgrip strength might be a good predictor for "proxy" muscle strength. To examine the reliability and validity of handgrip strength test in acute hospitalized older adults in comparison with other standardized muscular strength tests, and to examine its ability to discriminate between presence and absence of mobility limitations. Cross-sectional study. A total of 234 patients (mean age 87.0 years, 46% women) admitted to a tertiary public hospital between 2016 and 2017 were recruited. Maximal (one repetition maximum) and power muscle output of the upper and lower extremity along with functional capacity (as assessed with Barthel index and the Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]), and cognitive function was measured at admission. Functional impairment (mobility limitations) was defined at SPPB ≤7 points. Pearson's correlation and multivariable linear regression were evaluated between handgrip test and maximal and muscle power output as the reference method to assess concurrent validity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate handgrip strength cutoff point for likelihood of mobility limitations to assess predictive validity. Findings show moderate-to-strong correlations between standardized muscular strength (reference methods) and handgrip strength test ( = 0.534-0.725). All muscular strength tests show moderate accuracy (area under curve >0.7). Handgrip strength shows the higher positive predictive value (87%) and, therefore, a lower number of false positives. The overall handgrip strength cutoff point for likelihood of mobility limitations was 18.4 kg for men and women. Handgrip strength may be a useful tool for detecting acutely hospitalized older who are at risk of mobility limitations and could aid in focusing interventions on those with higher risk. Randomized clinical trial: NCT02300896.
有必要开发临床上可行的筛查工具来发现那些有更高活动受限风险的个体。然而,在急性住院患者(>75 岁)中,握力是否可能是“替代”肌肉力量的良好预测指标仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较急性住院老年人的握力测试与其他标准化肌肉力量测试的可靠性和有效性,并检验其区分有无活动受限的能力。这是一项横断面研究。共招募了 234 名(平均年龄 87.0 岁,46%为女性)于 2016 年至 2017 年期间入住三级公立医院的患者。在入院时测量了上肢和下肢的最大(一次重复最大)和肌肉力量输出以及功能能力(用巴氏指数和简短身体机能测试[SPPB]评估)和认知功能。功能障碍(活动受限)定义为 SPPB≤7 分。采用 Pearson 相关和多元线性回归评估握力测试与最大和肌肉力量输出之间的相关性,以评估其同时效度。采用受试者工作特征分析来估计握力强度截断值,以评估其对活动受限可能性的预测效度。研究结果表明,标准化肌肉力量(参考方法)与握力测试之间存在中度至高度相关性( = 0.534-0.725)。所有肌肉力量测试的准确性均为中度(曲线下面积>0.7)。握力测试具有较高的阳性预测值(87%),因此假阳性率较低。男性和女性活动受限可能性的总体握力截断值为 18.4 kg。握力可能是一种有用的工具,可用于发现有活动受限风险的急性住院老年人,并有助于将干预重点放在风险较高的人群上。随机临床试验:NCT02300896。