School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;147:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.144. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
In this systematic review, preoperative educational interventions for patients undergoing neurosurgical treatment are identified and their impact on patient knowledge acquisition and satisfaction is assessed.
The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and used PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Studies evaluating before and after cohort or control group comparison were identified between 2007 and 2019 and were independently scored and evaluated by 3 authors.
Eighty-one articles were assessed for eligibility and 15 met the inclusion criteria. Patient educational interventions were text-based (2 studies), multimedia/video-based (3), mobile/tablet-based (5), or used virtual reality (2) or three-dimensional printing (3). Interventions were disease-specific for cerebrovascular lesions (5), degenerative spine disease (2), concussion/traumatic brain injury (2), movement disorders (1), brain tumor (1), adolescent epilepsy (1), and other cranial/spinal elective procedures (3). Eleven studies (n = 18-175) documented patient knowledge acquisition using self-reported knowledge questionnaires (5) or more objective assessments based on true/false or multiple-choice questions (6). Most studies (10/11) reported statistically significant increases in patient knowledge after implementation of the intervention. Ten studies (n = 14-600) documented patient satisfaction using validated satisfaction surveys (2), Likert scale surveys (6), or other questionnaires (2). Although all studies reported increases in patient satisfaction after the intervention, only 4 were statistically significant.
Patient educational interventions using various modalities are broadly applicable within neurosurgery and ubiquitously enhance patient knowledge and satisfaction. Interventions should be implemented when possible.
本系统评价旨在确定神经外科治疗患者术前教育干预措施,并评估其对患者知识获取和满意度的影响。
本研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行,并检索了 2007 年至 2019 年期间的 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 MEDLINE 数据库,确定了前瞻性队列或对照组比较的研究,并由 3 位作者独立评分和评估。
评估了 81 篇文章的入选资格,其中 15 篇符合纳入标准。患者教育干预措施为基于文本的(2 项研究)、多媒体/视频的(3 项)、基于移动/平板电脑的(5 项)或使用虚拟现实(2 项)或三维打印(3 项)。干预措施针对脑血管病变(5 项)、退行性脊柱疾病(2 项)、脑震荡/创伤性脑损伤(2 项)、运动障碍(1 项)、脑肿瘤(1 项)、青少年癫痫(1 项)和其他颅/脊柱择期手术(3 项)。11 项研究(n=18-175)使用自我报告的知识问卷(5 项)或基于真假或多项选择题的更客观评估(6 项)记录了患者知识的获取情况。大多数研究(10/11)报告干预实施后患者知识有统计学意义的增加。10 项研究(n=14-600)使用验证满意度调查(2 项)、Likert 量表调查(6 项)或其他问卷(2 项)记录了患者满意度。虽然所有研究都报告干预后患者满意度增加,但只有 4 项具有统计学意义。
神经外科中广泛应用了各种模式的患者教育干预措施,普遍提高了患者的知识水平和满意度。如有可能,应实施干预措施。