Department of Paediatric Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF) - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Paediatric Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF) - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Paediatric Neurology, Hôpital Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium.
Seizure. 2021 Jan;84:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
To determine whether awake EEG criteria can differentiate epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and waves during sleep (EE-CSWS) at the time of cognitive regression from typical, self-limited focal epilepsy (SFE).
This retrospective case-control study was based on the analysis of awake EEGs and included 15 patients with EE-CSWS and 15 age-matched and sex-matched patients with typical SFE. The EEGs were anonymised and scored by four independent readers. The following qualitative and quantitative EEG indices were analysed: slow-wave index (SLWI), spike-wave index (SWI), spike-wave frequency (SWF), long spike-wave clusters (CLSW) and EEG score (between grades 0 and 4). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and their reproducibility with a kappa test.
Based on a highly sensitive cut-off, EE-CSWS patients were 8.4 times more likely than those with SFE to have an SLWI > 6%, 15 times more likely to have an SWI > 10 % and six times more likely to have a CLSW of ≥ 1 s. There was substantial agreement between readers (with kappa values of 0.64, 0.69 and 0.67). EE-CSWS patients were 13 times more likely to have an SWF of > 11 % and 149 times more likely to have an EEG score of ≥ 3 than typical SFE patients. Agreement about these ratings was almost perfect (kappa 0.91 and 0.86).
An EEG score of ≥ 3 on a 20-min awake EEG differentiates typical SFE from EE-CSWS at the time of cognitive regression, with good reliability across readers with different levels of expertise.
确定清醒脑电图标准是否可以区分认知功能下降时具有睡眠中持续棘慢波的癫痫性脑病(EE-CSWS)与典型、自限性局灶性癫痫(SFE)。
本回顾性病例对照研究基于清醒脑电图分析,纳入了 15 例 EE-CSWS 患者和 15 例年龄和性别匹配的典型 SFE 患者。对脑电图进行了匿名化和评分,由四位独立的读者进行。分析了以下定性和定量脑电图指标:慢波指数(SLWI)、棘慢波指数(SWI)、棘慢波频率(SWF)、长棘慢波簇(CLSW)和脑电图评分(0 至 4 级)。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估敏感性和特异性,并使用kappa 检验评估其可重复性。
基于高敏感性的截断值,EE-CSWS 患者的 SLWI>6%的可能性是 SFE 患者的 8.4 倍,SWI>10%的可能性是 SFE 患者的 15 倍,CLSW≥1 s 的可能性是 SFE 患者的 6 倍。读者之间存在实质性一致性(kappa 值分别为 0.64、0.69 和 0.67)。EE-CSWS 患者的 SWF>11%的可能性是 SFE 患者的 13 倍,脑电图评分≥3 的可能性是 SFE 患者的 149 倍。这些评分的一致性几乎是完美的(kappa 值为 0.91 和 0.86)。
20 分钟清醒脑电图的评分≥3 可区分认知功能下降时的典型 SFE 与 EE-CSWS,具有不同专业水平的读者之间的良好可靠性。