Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation.
Psychophysiology. 2022 May;59(5):e13735. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13735. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
Brain oscillations likely play a significant role in the storage of information in working memory (WM). Despite the wide popularity of the topic, current attempts to summarize the research in the field are narrative reviews. We address this gap by providing a descriptive systematic review, in which we investigated oscillatory correlates of maintenance of verbal and visual information in WM. The systematic approach enabled us to challenge some common views popularized by previous research. The identified literature (100 EEG/MEG studies) highlighted the importance of theta oscillations in verbal WM: frontal midline theta enhanced with load in most verbal studies, while more equivocal results have been obtained in visual studies. Increasing WM load affected alpha activity in most studies, but the direction of the effect was inconsistent: the ratio of studies that found alpha increase versus decrease with increasing load was 80/20% in the verbal WM domain and close to 60/40% in the visual domain. Alpha asymmetry (left < right) was a common finding in both verbal and visual WM studies. Beta and gamma activity studies yielded the least convincing data: a diversity in the spatial and frequency distribution of beta activity prevented us from making a coherent conclusion; gamma rhythm was virtually neglected in verbal WM studies with no systematic support for sustained gamma changes during the delay in EEG studies in general.
脑振荡可能在工作记忆 (WM) 中的信息存储中发挥重要作用。尽管这个主题非常流行,但目前试图总结该领域的研究都是叙述性评论。我们通过提供描述性的系统评价来解决这一差距,在该评价中,我们研究了 WM 中言语和视觉信息维持的振荡相关物。系统方法使我们能够挑战以前研究中流行的一些常见观点。已确定的文献(100 项 EEG / MEG 研究)强调了θ振荡在言语 WM 中的重要性:在前额中线θ中,大多数言语研究中的负载增强,而在视觉研究中则获得了更多模棱两可的结果。增加 WM 负载会影响大多数研究中的α活动,但影响的方向不一致:在言语 WM 领域,发现α增加与减少的研究比例为 80/20%,而在视觉领域则接近 60/40%。α不对称(左<右)是言语和视觉 WM 研究中的常见发现。β和γ活动研究产生的证据最不令人信服:β活动的空间和频率分布的多样性使我们无法得出一致的结论;在一般的 EEG 研究中,γ节律在言语 WM 研究中几乎被忽略,并且没有对延迟期间持续 γ 变化的系统支持。