PhD student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University - UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Visiting Researcher, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University - UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil; Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, São Francisco University (USF), Bragança Paulista, SP, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):469.e1-469.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
Chairside computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials that do not require any firing steps are a promising option to expedite restoration production; however, little information is available to determine the most suitable material for each clinical situation.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of simulated toothbrushing on surface gloss, roughness, and wear of chairside CAD-CAM materials.
Disk-shaped specimens (n=15) were prepared of the following materials: ENA-VITA Enamic; LAV-Lava Ultimate; EMP-IPS Empress CAD; CER-Cerasmart; GRA-Grandio blocs. Gloss (Gloss Unit-GU) and surface roughness (Ra-μm) were evaluated before and after simulated toothbrushing (100 000 strokes). Wear (μm) was assessed by contact profilometry. Additional analyses of microhardness by scanning electron microscopy were also performed. Data were analyzed with 2-way repeated measures ANOVA test for roughness and gloss, and 1-way ANOVA for wear (α=.05). To estimate the correlation between Ra and GU, the Pearson correlation was calculated.
Before brushing, CER showed the lowest Ra (P<.001), and GRA the lowest GU values. After brushing, the feldspathic ceramic-based materials (ENA and EMP) presented the highest gloss, whereas the ceramic group (EMP) showed the lowest Ra. Before and after brushing, GRA showed the lowest GU values. Higher wear values were found for the composite resin groups (CER>GRA), with the exception of LAVA, which was similar to ENA, and EMP showing improved wear resistance. A strong negative correlation (-0.925) between GU and Ra values was detected (P<.001).
The materials containing a glass phase (ENA and EMP) presented higher wear resistance, higher gloss, and lower roughness after brushing than the other materials tested. The correlation test showed that the higher the surface roughness, the lower the gloss.
无需任何烧制步骤的椅旁计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)材料是加速修复体生产的有前途的选择;然而,关于确定每种临床情况最适合的材料的信息很少。
本体外研究的目的是评估模拟刷牙对椅旁 CAD-CAM 材料表面光泽度、粗糙度和磨损的影响。
制备了以下材料的圆盘状试件(n=15):ENA-VITA Enamic;LAV-Lava Ultimate;EMP-IPS Empress CAD;CER-Cerasmart;GRA-Grandio 块。在模拟刷牙(100000 次冲程)前后评估光泽度(光泽度单位-GU)和表面粗糙度(Ra-μm)。通过接触式轮廓仪评估磨损(μm)。还通过扫描电子显微镜对微硬度进行了额外分析。使用 2 因素重复测量方差分析评估粗糙度和光泽度,使用 1 因素方差分析评估磨损(α=.05)。为了估计 Ra 和 GU 之间的相关性,计算了 Pearson 相关性。
在刷牙前,CER 显示出最低的 Ra(P<.001),GRA 显示出最低的 GU 值。刷牙后,长石质陶瓷基材料(ENA 和 EMP)显示出最高的光泽度,而陶瓷组(EMP)显示出最低的 Ra。刷牙前后,GRA 显示出最低的 GU 值。复合树脂组(CER>GRA)的磨损值较高,例外是 LAVA,其与 ENA 相似,而 EMP 显示出耐磨性提高。GU 和 Ra 值之间存在很强的负相关(-0.925)(P<.001)。
含有玻璃相的材料(ENA 和 EMP)在刷牙后表现出更高的耐磨性、更高的光泽度和更低的粗糙度,而其他测试材料则不然。相关性测试表明,表面粗糙度越高,光泽度越低。