• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Erratum to "ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models" [J Clin Epidemiol. 126C(2020):207-16].

作者信息

Verbakel Jan Y, Steyerberg Ewout W, Uno Hajime, De Cock Bavo, Wynants Laure, Collins Gary S, Van Calster Ben

机构信息

KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:171-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.013
PMID:33280987
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Erratum to "ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models" [J Clin Epidemiol. 126C(2020):207-16].《临床预测模型的ROC曲线 第1部分：评估临床预测模型性能时，ROC图在AUC之上未显示额外价值》的勘误[《临床流行病学杂志》。126C(2020):207 - 16]
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:171-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
Corrigendum to "Studies reporting ROC curves of diagnostic and prediction data were incorporated into meta-analyses using corresponding odds ratios" [J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):530-4].《关于“将报告诊断和预测数据ROC曲线的研究纳入使用相应比值比的Meta分析”的勘误》[《临床流行病学杂志》。2007年5月；60(5):530 - 4]
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:147. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.010.
3
The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets.在不平衡数据集上评估二元分类器时，精确率-召回率曲线比ROC曲线更具信息性。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 4;10(3):e0118432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432. eCollection 2015.
4
Simple Decision-Analytic Functions of the AUC for Ruling Out a Risk Prediction Model and an Added Predictor.用于排除风险预测模型和附加预测因子的 AUC 的简单决策分析函数。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Feb;38(2):225-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17732994. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
Comparison of four 'second generation' immunoassay systems to determine CA 125 in serum by using a graphical approach to method comparison analysis.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997 Aug;35(8):617-23.
6
Three-hour post-ERCP amylase level: a useful indicator for early prediction of post-ERCP pancreatitis.ERCP 后 3 小时淀粉酶水平：预测 ERCP 后胰腺炎的有用指标。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01254-7.
7
Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.当拟合的双正态曲线呈现不合适的形状时估计ROC曲线下的面积。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
8
External validation is only needed when prediction models are worth it (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:25-34).只有当预测模型值得进行外部验证时才需要进行外部验证（对《临床流行病学杂志》2015年；68卷：25 - 34页的评论信）
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:249-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.022. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
Erratum to "A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses" [J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;113:159-67].《对“一项系统调查确定了36条用于评估随机试验或荟萃分析中效应修饰声明的标准”的勘误》[《临床流行病学杂志》。2019年；113:159 - 167] 。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 4.
10
Prediction models for platinum-based chemotherapy response and toxicity in advanced NSCLC patients.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者铂类化疗反应和毒性的预测模型
Cancer Lett. 2016 Jul 10;377(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary intracranial malignant lymphoma: A Retrospective study based on the SEER database.预测原发性颅内恶性淋巴瘤患者总生存期和癌症特异性生存期的列线图的开发与验证：一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果（SEER）数据库的回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 9;12:1055046. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1055046. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression as predictive models for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia: A retrospective study.机器学习与逻辑回归作为子痫前期不良母婴结局预测模型的比较：一项回顾性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:959649. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959649. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and multimodal validation of a substance misuse algorithm for referral to treatment using artificial intelligence (SMART-AI): a retrospective deep learning study.开发并通过多模态验证了一种使用人工智能（SMART-AI）进行转介治疗的药物滥用算法：一项回顾性深度学习研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e426-e435. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00041-3.